Crystallography and Crystal Defects. Anthony Kelly

, respectively, which are labelled B and C, respectively in Figure 1.26. We can preserve the threefold symmetry (while of course destroying the sixfold one) by stacking nets so that the extremity of t₃ has coordinates of either , .or , . The two positions B and C in Figure 1.26 are equivalent to one another in the sense that the same lattice is produced whatever the order in which these two positions are used.

Figure 1.26 The stacking of triequiangular nets of points in a staggered sequence. Lattice points labelled A, B and C belong to nets of lattice points at different heights relative to the plane of the paper

A plan of the lattice produced, viewed along the triad axis, is shown in Figure 1.27, and a sketch of the relationship between the triequiangular nets and the primitive cells of this lattice is shown in Figure 1.28. In Figures 1.27 and 1.28 the stacking sequence of the nets has been set as ABCABCABC… Exactly the same lattice but in a different orientation (rotated 60° clockwise looking down upon the paper in Figure 1.27) would have been produced if the sequence ACBACBACB… had been followed. The primitive cell of the trigonal lattice in Figure 1.28 is shown in Figure 1.19k. It can be given the symbol R. It is a rhombohedron, the edges of the cell being of equal length, each equally inclined to the single threefold axis. To specify the cell we must state a = b = c and the angle α = β = γ < 120°.

Figure 1.27 Lattice points in the net at level zero are marked with a dot, those in the net at height z by an open circle, and those at 2z by a plus sign. The projection of t₃ onto the plane of the nets is shown

Figure 1.28 The relationship between a primitive cell of the trigonal lattice and the triply primitive hexagonal cell

An alternative cell is sometimes used to describe the trigonal lattice R because of the inconvenience in dealing with a lattice of axial angle α, which may take any value between 0 and 120°. The alternative cell is shown in Figure 1.28 and in plan viewed along the triad axis in Figure 1.29. It is a triply primitive cell, three mesh layers high, with internal lattice points at elevations of and of the repeat distance along the triad axis. The cell is of the same shape as the conventional unit cell of the hexagonal Bravais lattice and to specify it we must know a = b ≠ c, α = β = 90° and γ = 120°.

Figure 1.29 Plan view of the alternative triply primitive hexagonal unit cell used to describe the trigonal R lattice

Crystals belonging to the cubic system possess four threefold axes of rotational symmetry. The angles between the four threefold axes are such that these threefold axes lie along the body diagonals of a cube (Figure 1.30), with angles of 70.53° (cos⁻¹(1/3)) between them. Reference to Table 1.2 and Figure 1.17b shows that these threefold axes cannot exist alone in a crystal. They must be accompanied by at least three twofold axes. To indicate how the lattices consistent with this arrangement of threefold axes arise, we start with the R lattice shown in Figure 1.28 and call the separation of nearest‐neighbour lattice points in the triequiangular net s and the vertical separation of the nets along the triad axis h. The positions of the lattice points in the successive layers when all are projected onto the plane perpendicular to the triad axis can be designated ABCABC… as in Figures 1.26 and 1.28. In a trigonal lattice, the spacing of the nets, h, is unrelated to the separation of the lattice points within the nets, s. If we make the spacing of the nets such that h = (= 2s/), the angle α in Figure 1.28 becomes 60° and triangles A₁B₁B₂, A₁B₂B₄, A₁B₁B₄ all become equilateral. Planes such as A₁B₁C₁B₂, A₁B₂C₂B₄, A₁B₁C₃B₄ all contain triequiangular nets of points. Planes parallel to each of these three planes also contain triequiangular nets of points and are also stacked so as to preserve triad symmetry along lines normal to them. When α = 60°, the original trigonal lattice becomes consistent with the possession of four threefold axes. The conventional unit cell of this lattice is shown in Figure 1.19m; it is a cube centred on all faces. The relationship between this cell and the primitive one with α = 60° is shown in Figure 1.31.

Figure 1.30 The four 〈111〉 three‐fold axes with acute angles of 70.53° between one another which together define the minimum