The Essene Prophet described himself as the prophet presaged by Moses, who was to bring mankind the Divine Law. This revelation meant the achievement of original purity though baptism and observance of the Divine Commandments. Humans are to be reborn and become a new creation.
Then another said: "Moses, the greatest in Palestine, suffered our forefathers to eat the flesh of clean beasts, and forbade only the flesh of unclean beasts. Why, therefore, do you forbid us the flesh of all beasts? Which law comes from God? That of Moses, or your law?"
And Jesus answered: "God gave, by Moses, ten commandments to your forefathers. 'These commandments are hard,' said your forefathers, and they could not keep them. When Moses saw this, he had compassion on his people,
and would not that they perish. And then he gave them ten times ten commandments. For he whose feet are strong as the mountain of Zion, needs no crutches; but he whose limbs do shake, gets further having crutches, than without them. And Moses said to the Lord: 'My heart is filled with sorrow, for my people will be lost. For they are without knowledge, and are not able to understand thy commandments. They are as little children who cannot yet understand their father's words. Suffer, Lord, that I give them other laws, that they may not perish. If they may not be with thee, Lord, let them not be against thee; that they may sustain themselves, and when the time has come, and they are ripe for thy words, reveal to them thy laws.' For that did Moses break the two tablets of stone whereon were written the ten commandments, and he gave them ten times ten in their stead. And of these ten times ten the Scribes and Pharisees have made a hundred times ten commandments. And they have laid unbearable burdens on your shoulders, that they themselves do not carry. For the more nigh are the commandments to God, the less do we need; and the farther they are from God, then the more do we need. Wherefore are the laws of the Pharisees and Scribes innumerable; the laws of the Son of Man seven; of the angels three; and of God one.
"Therefore, I teach you only those laws which you can understand, that you may become men, and follow the seven laws of the Son of Man. Then will the unknown angels of the Heavenly Father also reveal their laws to you, that God's holy spirit may descend upon you, and lead you to his law."4
Every human is a child of the Earth and the Heavenly Father. Original purity can be achieved by striving for perfect harmony with Mother Earth and the cosmos. Whether one believes the words of the Essene Baptist or not, everyone can recognize a clear and comprehensible guide, which is conclusive.
Before I argue that the Gospel of the Essenes is 2000 years old, I must first introduce the reader to the methods of adulteration employed in creating the plagiarism that is the NT as well as important parts of the OT.
The authentic texts that are presented herein prove the 2000-year-old authenticity of the Gospel of Essenes. They were used for adulteration and altered according to the same principle. Those who do not undestand the plagiarists' approach will not recognize the plagiarism in the fake texts.
The plagiarists proceeded in the following manner:
Chapters from the authentic texts were fragmented by the plagiarists and inserted into the New Testament in a different context and distributed among the Gospels written by the various evangelists.
Entire sections were deleted from the authentic chapters and only segments of the texts were presented in this way and thus "packaged" in a manner that offered a completely different meaning.
Because the underlying intention was thoroughly concealed, the forgers succeeded in preparing the authentic texts in such a way that, when the original and falsifications are juxtaposed, one would not easily determine a deviation of meaning.
I soon realized that the falsifiers employed a certain pattern, words taken from the authentic gospel and then used in the NT with a different meaning, mostly in fantastic stories, pursuing a certain goal.
Symbolism was transformed into real scenarios and vice versa … in this way the plagiarists succeeded in proclaiming opposite meanings with the same words and could even appear to be in harmony with the OT.
The mere negation of a sentence was a frequent method of falsifying, though also through the replacement of a single word, for example a preposition, the same effect could be achieved.
The similarity of the terms should obviously trigger a kind of Déjà-vu among the readers, but it also later became clear to me that, in order to provide a basis for the non-sensical doctrine of grace: the supporters were soft-boiled by fantasy and persuaded to cease using their minds. Virtue was simply to believe in the unbelievable in order to prove one’s faith because a doubter would not attain eternal life.
On the basis of the fantasy the Bible presents us, it was not difficult for the falsifiers to invent a religion of grace that is as nonsensical as the claims that Jesus had brought deceased persons back to life, commanded a storm, and had walked upon the water.
The adherents of the religion of grace were to believe in a religion which is not at all a reliion, for it consisted solely in believing that Jesus had died for our sins. They were to believe they were invested with original sin and unable to observe the Divine Commandments, and for that reason Jesus had been crucified.
It gradually became clear to me that without exception the entire NT was drafted or falsified according to the same principle: a realization leadin to no other conclusion than that the NT and important parts of the ÓT originated from one and the same source, but also that all the texts in the NT were written in the same period and that the authentic gospels used for this had once been a unit.
Accordingly, there could never have been a canonization of the Gospels in the year 324. Later, it became clear that Paul was a fictitious figure introduced by the falsifiers of the true gospel in order to consolidate this doctrine of grace. It was the same with the other writers of the New Testament, as a red thread was drawn through the Epistles of Paul, the Epistles of James, Peter, John, and even in the Revelation of John. There also I was able to detect the same methodology and falsification in the Gospels of the NT.
To understand the deceit, one has to seek the truth and that means examining the texts that served as the basis for the forgery. Then we have to ask ourselves why they were falsified - a question which leads us to the motive.
What then was so dangerousín the original message, such that the forgers as well as the church fathers and historians promulgated apocrypha, etc., spared themselves no efforts, however extensive and enormous, in formulating the writings in both the New and Old Testaments in a manner as to destroy a doctrine of health and purity?
For it soon became clear to me that the NT was only the tip of the iceberg. The other writings used to support this deceit are by far greater.
This doctrine, starting innocently enough, spread inexorably and became the greatest danger with which the Romans had to contend. That is because the message which was adopted by Jewish compatriots of the Prophet not only threatened to gradually undermine Roman rule but the even Prophet himself was feared by Rome. The Emperor believed this man, who had emerged from nowhere yet had acquired so many followers, wanted to seize the scepter of power, a fact the Bible does not mention. The following text is a message from the Prophet to the Emperor:
"… If the emperors of Rome were to exercise righteousness and grace, if they would walk with humility with their God, they would all receive the blessing of God.
They had no need to fear a messenger whom God had sent. I have not come to the throne to rule with Caesar's laws. Inform the one who rules over the Jews that I do not desire his throne. "5
This holy man who spoke in metaphors of the Divine Law, of the holy temple, of inner and outer baptism, of purity of the body, of Christ, Satan, circumcision, Holy Land, and virginity, was none other than John the Baptist, whose doctrine of purity was perverted because he was the most dangerous man of his time. Aiming to obscure his superordinate importance, he was immediately sidelined at the beginning of the composition of the New Testament.
The