Unlocking the Political Mind. Ronald J. Fintak Sr. M.S.

suffering because he believes it is noble for The (liberal) Cause. That being said, he sees human suffering as a necessary but temporary condition that should help to magically bring forth a social paradise that finally erases all forms of human suffering.

      Curiously, failure is also sensed as order. Failure proves that his enemy is a powerful, diabolical force that deserves stronger, and more sustained, condemnation. In other words, failure only motivates him to stay in the fight to call for more vitriol. Keep in mind that he is backed by people who see him as a kind of savior; “saviors” never fail, only falter for a time, or repair to a more defensive position.

      Of course, any plan the liberal, community organizer envisions is the perfect plan; plans not of his vision are necessarily flawed.

      His social unit views its community organizer as its last hope. A religious-like faith in him must reject aspects of reality. In other words, the people he’s trying to “save” are living in an imagined reality born of the organizer’s fantasies. Within this imagined reality, the organizer can create crises to invent new targets for his followers to despise.

      President Obama spoke to us as if he was America’s superhero fighting corrupt and greedy adversaries. No one but he had the courage and determination to protect America’s helpless citizens from diabolical machinations of conservatives.

      Obama’s enemy—every community organizer needs an enemy—is the wealthy.

      This is disingenuous because Obama unashamedly cavorts with the wealthy, and is one of them. A common target of a community organizer is a business that promotes free enterprise. He sees it as a runaway manifestation of capitalism, and a seat of financial power not under the control of government. Therefore, it is a dangerous power controlled by an anti-government mind-set—a threat in every sense of the word.

      But the community organizer senses true conservatives as his most pernicious enemy, not only because they represent the opposing, political party, he knows they are invulnerable to liberal psychology. Conservative belief in the power of the individual to strike out on his own to invent, create, sacrifice, learn, experiment, and develop one’s potential, is a belief Obama could only disparage, never challenge. Consequently, human instincts to live free must be blamed, shamed, disrespected, condemned, ridiculed, hated, pointed to as politically incorrect or un-American, and denied whenever possible.

      What about President Obama’s style of governing as president? In one sense, he didn’t govern; he stood on the sidelines to throw political mud. More to the point: Governing was too risky; it made him responsible and exposed him to criticism. Actually governing documents one’s incompetence, true intentions, and pulls back the mask of the political superhero saving the poor and helpless. Compulsive campaigning temporarily removed him from presidential accountability while maintaining a good standing among his followers; it also regenerated opportunities for reenacting his previous role as community organizer, now as an all-knowing, federal referee stalwartly standing between America’s true believers and their political enemies.

      How did he get away with it?

      Get away with what? Who’s to know if no one exposes the above? The media won’t; they merely repeated and embellished what Obama said, and demonized anyone who dared criticize.

      By standing aloof from politics, and shielded from criticism, Obama was free to shape minds of his followers, and disown mistakes and collateral damage. So removed from the rough and tumble of politics, he came off as a wise authority pontificating to dazzle followers, impress political peers, and threaten detractors.

      Obama, standing aloof as president, never had to apologize. He, on one hand chastised political enemies while on the other hand told his followers how evil his enemies are, and how he had his followers’ backs. This magnificent crusader, in the eyes of his adorning downtrodden, was therefore free to do whatever he wanted knowing he will never be blamed for the misery he causes. Should effects of his political incompetence leak to the public, America’s media would immediately plug the leak.

      Obama’s missteps—there have been many—will never register in the minds of his chronically ignorant minions as an error in judgment, political corruption, an effect of liberalism, or political malfeasance.

      Some may admire Obama’s genius for standing on a self-made pedestal that protected him from the din of political conflict; nonetheless, it is nothing more than what any liberal, community organizer would do when opportunities fall his way.

      One could make an individual, psychological profile of any liberal mind—what you’ll be able to do this after reading this book. For now, simply listen to a liberal politician. Pick up any newspaper. Watch any political talk show. Note how liberals avoid blame and deny responsibility, blur distinctions between causes and effects, blend cause-effect interactions to fit liberal talking points, and treat liberal mistakes as if they have no causes, take place in isolation, or just happen. Here are some examples: