<--- Score
127. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
128. Is the SAN file system scope manageable?
<--- Score
129. How do you catch SAN file system definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
130. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the SAN file system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?
<--- Score
2. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
3. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
4. What are the types and number of measures to use?
<--- Score
5. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?
<--- Score
6. What is the cost of rework?
<--- Score
7. What happens if cost savings do not materialize?
<--- Score
8. How do you verify your resources?
<--- Score
9. Who pays the cost?
<--- Score
10. How do you measure variability?
<--- Score
11. Is the solution cost-effective?
<--- Score
12. Who is involved in verifying compliance?
<--- Score
13. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
14. Are there competing SAN file system priorities?
<--- Score
15. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?
<--- Score
16. Does the SAN file system task fit the client’s priorities?
<--- Score
17. Among the SAN file system product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?
<--- Score
18. Are SAN file system vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?
<--- Score
19. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
20. Which costs should be taken into account?
<--- Score
21. What relevant entities could be measured?
<--- Score
22. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?
<--- Score
23. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
24. How sensitive must the SAN file system strategy be to cost?
<--- Score
25. Does a SAN file system quantification method exist?
<--- Score
26. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
27. What are hidden SAN file system quality costs?
<--- Score
28. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
29. What harm might be caused?
<--- Score
30. What details are required of the SAN file system cost structure?
<--- Score
31. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
32. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
33. How do you verify and validate the SAN file system data?
<--- Score
34. Is the cost worth the SAN file system effort ?
<--- Score
35. What is the SAN file system business impact?
<--- Score
36. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
37. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
38. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
39. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?
<--- Score
40. How can a SAN file system test verify your ideas or assumptions?
<--- Score
41. What are the costs of delaying SAN file system action?
<--- Score
42. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
43. How can you manage cost down?
<--- Score
44. What is measured? Why?
<--- Score
45. What causes investor action?
<--- Score
46. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?
<--- Score
47. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
48. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?
<--- Score
49. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
50. What users will be impacted?
<--- Score
51. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?
<--- Score
52. How frequently do you track SAN file system measures?
<--- Score
53. What does losing