<--- Score
65. Are the Transparent context requirements complete?
<--- Score
66. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
67. How does the Transparent context manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
68. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
69. How do you think the partners involved in Transparent context would have defined success?
<--- Score
70. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Transparent context results are met?
<--- Score
71. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Transparent context brings?
<--- Score
72. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
73. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
74. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
75. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
76. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
77. Has a Transparent context requirement not been met?
<--- Score
78. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
79. How are consistent Transparent context definitions important?
<--- Score
80. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
81. Is the Transparent context scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
82. How have you defined all Transparent context requirements first?
<--- Score
83. Why are you doing Transparent context and what is the scope?
<--- Score
84. How did the Transparent context manager receive input to the development of a Transparent context improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
85. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
86. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Transparent context work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
87. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
88. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
89. Will a Transparent context production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
90. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
91. What is the context?
<--- Score
92. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
93. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
94. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
95. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
96. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
97. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
98. Has the Transparent context work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
99. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
100. Is Transparent context linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
101. What is the scope of Transparent context?
<--- Score
102. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
103. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Transparent context changes?
<--- Score
104. Who are the Transparent context improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
105. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
106. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
107. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
108. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
109. What is the scope of the Transparent context effort?
<--- Score
110. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
111. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
112. How do you hand over Transparent context context?
<--- Score
113. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
114. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
116. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
117. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
118. What system do you use for gathering Transparent context