<--- Score
51. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
52. How are consistent Design Engineering and Construction Services definitions important?
<--- Score
53. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
54. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
55. Is there a Design Engineering and Construction Services management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
56. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
57. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Design Engineering and Construction Services results are met?
<--- Score
58. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
59. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
60. What would be the goal or target for a Design Engineering and Construction Services’s improvement team?
<--- Score
61. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
62. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
63. Who is gathering Design Engineering and Construction Services information?
<--- Score
64. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
65. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
66. Will team members regularly document their Design Engineering and Construction Services work?
<--- Score
67. What was the context?
<--- Score
68. What is the scope of the Design Engineering and Construction Services effort?
<--- Score
69. Is there any additional Design Engineering and Construction Services definition of success?
<--- Score
70. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
71. Is Design Engineering and Construction Services linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
72. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Design Engineering and Construction Services work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
73. Are the Design Engineering and Construction Services requirements testable?
<--- Score
74. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
75. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
76. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
77. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
78. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
79. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
80. How do you gather Design Engineering and Construction Services requirements?
<--- Score
81. Have all basic functions of Design Engineering and Construction Services been defined?
<--- Score
82. How can the value of Design Engineering and Construction Services be defined?
<--- Score
83. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
84. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
85. What are (control) requirements for Design Engineering and Construction Services Information?
<--- Score
86. Do you have a Design Engineering and Construction Services success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
87. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
88. Is the Design Engineering and Construction Services scope manageable?
<--- Score
89. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
90. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
91. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
92. What are the Design Engineering and Construction Services use cases?
<--- Score
93. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
94. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
95. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
96. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
97. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
98. What happens if Design Engineering and Construction Services’s scope changes?
<--- Score
99. What sources do you use to gather information for a Design Engineering and Construction Services study?
<--- Score
100. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
101. Is there a clear Design Engineering and Construction Services case definition?
<---