In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
2. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
3. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
4. When is/was the Scientific workflow management system start date?
<--- Score
5. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
6. Is there a critical path to deliver Scientific workflow management system results?
<--- Score
7. Has the Scientific workflow management system work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
8. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
9. Is Scientific workflow management system required?
<--- Score
10. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
11. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
12. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Scientific workflow management system work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
13. Are accountability and ownership for Scientific workflow management system clearly defined?
<--- Score
14. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
15. How are consistent Scientific workflow management system definitions important?
<--- Score
16. Is there a Scientific workflow management system management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
17. How can the value of Scientific workflow management system be defined?
<--- Score
18. How do you manage unclear Scientific workflow management system requirements?
<--- Score
19. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
20. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
21. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
22. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
23. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
24. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
25. Are the Scientific workflow management system requirements complete?
<--- Score
26. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
27. What is in scope?
<--- Score
28. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
29. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
30. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
31. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
32. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
33. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
34. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
35. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
36. What sources do you use to gather information for a Scientific workflow management system study?
<--- Score
37. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Scientific workflow management system goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
39. Is Scientific workflow management system currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
40. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
41. How does the Scientific workflow management system manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
42. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Scientific workflow management system results are met?
<--- Score
43. Will team members perform Scientific workflow management system work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
44. Are improvement team members fully trained on Scientific workflow management system?
<--- Score
45. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
46. Who approved the Scientific workflow management system scope?
<--- Score
47. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
48. What is the context?
<--- Score
49. How do you think the partners involved in Scientific workflow management system would have defined success?
<--- Score
50. What are (control) requirements for Scientific workflow management system Information?
<--- Score
51. What gets