<--- Score
116. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Education and social mobility? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
117. How do you catch Education and social mobility definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
118. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
119. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Education and social mobility work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
120. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
121. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
122. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
123. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
124. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
125. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
126. What was the context?
<--- Score
127. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
128. How are consistent Education and social mobility definitions important?
<--- Score
129. What gets examined?
<--- Score
130. Why are you doing Education and social mobility and what is the scope?
<--- Score
131. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
132. What is the scope of the Education and social mobility effort?
<--- Score
133. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
134. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Education and social mobility Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How will effects be measured?
<--- Score
2. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
3. What are hidden Education and social mobility quality costs?
<--- Score
4. What is an unallowable cost?
<--- Score
5. What is the Education and social mobility business impact?
<--- Score
6. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
7. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?
<--- Score
8. How is performance measured?
<--- Score
9. What do you measure and why?
<--- Score
10. Do the benefits outweigh the costs?
<--- Score
11. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?
<--- Score
12. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?
<--- Score
13. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?
<--- Score
14. What does your operating model cost?
<--- Score
15. Are indirect costs charged to the Education and social mobility program?
<--- Score
16. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Education and social mobility services/products?
<--- Score
17. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
18. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
19. Are missed Education and social mobility opportunities costing your organization money?
<--- Score
20. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
21. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
22. Have design-to-cost goals been established?
<--- Score
23. What would be a real cause for concern?
<--- Score
24. How do you verify the Education and social mobility requirements quality?
<--- Score
25. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
26. What causes mismanagement?
<--- Score
27. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?
<--- Score
28. What does losing customers cost your organization?
<--- Score
29. What is the total cost related to deploying Education and social mobility, including any consulting or professional services?
<--- Score
30. Is the cost worth the Education and social mobility effort ?
<--- Score
31. Are the measurements objective?
<--- Score
32. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?
<--- Score
33. Who should receive measurement reports?
<--- Score
34.