<--- Score
12. How do you gather Method of analysis requirements?
<--- Score
13. What is in scope?
<--- Score
14. What would be the goal or target for a Method of analysis’s improvement team?
<--- Score
15. What are the core elements of the Method of analysis business case?
<--- Score
16. Are the Method of analysis requirements complete?
<--- Score
17. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Method of analysis? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
18. How do you manage changes in Method of analysis requirements?
<--- Score
19. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
20. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
21. Is the Method of analysis scope manageable?
<--- Score
22. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Method of analysis work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
23. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
24. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
25. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
26. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
27. What is the scope of the Method of analysis effort?
<--- Score
28. What Method of analysis services do you require?
<--- Score
29. What system do you use for gathering Method of analysis information?
<--- Score
30. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
31. Is there a critical path to deliver Method of analysis results?
<--- Score
32. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
33. Is the Method of analysis scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
34. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
35. How can the value of Method of analysis be defined?
<--- Score
36. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
37. How are consistent Method of analysis definitions important?
<--- Score
38. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
39. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
40. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
41. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
42. How will the Method of analysis team and the group measure complete success of Method of analysis?
<--- Score
43. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Method of analysis changes?
<--- Score
44. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
45. How have you defined all Method of analysis requirements first?
<--- Score
46. When is/was the Method of analysis start date?
<--- Score
47. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
48. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
49. How would you define Method of analysis leadership?
<--- Score
50. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
51. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
52. Is Method of analysis linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
53. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
54. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
55. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Method of analysis?
<--- Score
56. How do you hand over Method of analysis context?
<--- Score
57. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
58. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
59. What are the Method of analysis use cases?
<--- Score
60. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
61. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Method of analysis results are met?
<--- Score
62. Is Method of analysis currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
63. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
64. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
65. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
66. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
67. What is the scope of the Method of analysis work?
<--- Score
68.