<--- Score
60. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
61. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
62. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
63. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
64. What are the Compensation and Benefits Review use cases?
<--- Score
65. Have all basic functions of Compensation and Benefits Review been defined?
<--- Score
66. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
67. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
68. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Compensation and Benefits Review changes?
<--- Score
69. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
70. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
71. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
72. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
73. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
74. What sources do you use to gather information for a Compensation and Benefits Review study?
<--- Score
75. What are the core elements of the Compensation and Benefits Review business case?
<--- Score
76. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
77. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
78. How have you defined all Compensation and Benefits Review requirements first?
<--- Score
79. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
80. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
81. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
82. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
83. How will the Compensation and Benefits Review team and the group measure complete success of Compensation and Benefits Review?
<--- Score
84. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Compensation and Benefits Review? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
85. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
86. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
87. Is there any additional Compensation and Benefits Review definition of success?
<--- Score
88. What is the scope of the Compensation and Benefits Review work?
<--- Score
89. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
90. Is Compensation and Benefits Review linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
91. What gets examined?
<--- Score
92. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
93. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Compensation and Benefits Review leverage and how?
<--- Score
94. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
95. What is the scope of Compensation and Benefits Review?
<--- Score
96. How did the Compensation and Benefits Review manager receive input to the development of a Compensation and Benefits Review improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
97. What are the record-keeping requirements of Compensation and Benefits Review activities?
<--- Score
98. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Compensation and Benefits Review brings?
<--- Score
99. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
100. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
101. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
102. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Compensation and Benefits Review?
<--- Score
103. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
104. What Compensation and Benefits Review requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
105. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
106. Is the Compensation and Benefits Review scope manageable?
<--- Score
107. When is/was the Compensation and Benefits Review start date?
<--- Score
108. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
109. Is the scope of Compensation and Benefits Review defined?
<--- Score
110. What was the context?
<--- Score
111. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
112. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
113. Has the Compensation and Benefits Review work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<---