<--- Score
53. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
54. Has a Emergency communication systems requirement not been met?
<--- Score
55. What is in scope?
<--- Score
56. Will a Emergency communication systems production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
57. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
58. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
59. Is special Emergency communication systems user knowledge required?
<--- Score
60. How would you define Emergency communication systems leadership?
<--- Score
61. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
62. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
63. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
64. How did the Emergency communication systems manager receive input to the development of a Emergency communication systems improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
65. Do you all define Emergency communication systems in the same way?
<--- Score
66. What sources do you use to gather information for a Emergency communication systems study?
<--- Score
67. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
68. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
69. Has the Emergency communication systems work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
70. Are the Emergency communication systems requirements testable?
<--- Score
71. What happens if Emergency communication systems’s scope changes?
<--- Score
72. What was the context?
<--- Score
73. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
74. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
75. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
76. Is there a critical path to deliver Emergency communication systems results?
<--- Score
77. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
78. How does the Emergency communication systems manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
79. Are improvement team members fully trained on Emergency communication systems?
<--- Score
80. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
81. How do you think the partners involved in Emergency communication systems would have defined success?
<--- Score
82. Will team members regularly document their Emergency communication systems work?
<--- Score
83. How do you manage changes in Emergency communication systems requirements?
<--- Score
84. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
85. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Emergency communication systems leverage and how?
<--- Score
86. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
87. Is the Emergency communication systems scope manageable?
<--- Score
88. What is the definition of Emergency communication systems excellence?
<--- Score
89. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Emergency communication systems?
<--- Score
90. Is there a Emergency communication systems management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
91. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Emergency communication systems brings?
<--- Score
92. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
93. Is the scope of Emergency communication systems defined?
<--- Score
94. What are the core elements of the Emergency communication systems business case?
<--- Score
95. Is the Emergency communication systems scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
96. What Emergency communication systems requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
97. Who are the Emergency communication systems improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
98. What gets examined?
<--- Score
99. What is the context?
<--- Score
100. What is the scope of the Emergency communication systems effort?
<--- Score
101. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
102. Have specific policy objectives been defined?
<--- Score
103. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
104. What system do you use for gathering Emergency communication systems information?
<--- Score
105. Is Emergency communication systems required?
<---