<--- Score
8. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
9. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
10. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Health technology assessment work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
11. How can the value of Health technology assessment be defined?
<--- Score
12. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
13. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
14. How do you hand over Health technology assessment context?
<--- Score
15. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
16. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
17. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
18. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
19. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
20. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
21. How would you define Health technology assessment leadership?
<--- Score
22. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
23. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
24. How do you gather Health technology assessment requirements?
<--- Score
25. Are the Health technology assessment requirements testable?
<--- Score
26. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
27. How do you catch Health technology assessment definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
28. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
29. How do you manage changes in Health technology assessment requirements?
<--- Score
30. What happens if Health technology assessment’s scope changes?
<--- Score
31. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
32. What sources do you use to gather information for a Health technology assessment study?
<--- Score
33. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
34. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
35. Will team members perform Health technology assessment work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
36. What is the scope of the Health technology assessment effort?
<--- Score
37. What is in scope?
<--- Score
38. Is the Health technology assessment scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
39. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
40. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
41. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
42. Who approved the Health technology assessment scope?
<--- Score
43. Has the Health technology assessment work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
44. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
45. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
46. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
47. Is there a clear Health technology assessment case definition?
<--- Score
48. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
49. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
50. Is Health technology assessment linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
51. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
52. How do you think the partners involved in Health technology assessment would have defined success?
<--- Score
53. Who is gathering Health technology assessment information?
<--- Score
54. Has a Health technology assessment requirement not been met?
<--- Score
55. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
56. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
57. Is Health technology assessment required?
<--- Score
58. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
59. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
60. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
61. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score