63. Is there a critical path to deliver Government transparency results?
<--- Score
64. What is the scope of Government transparency?
<--- Score
65. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
66. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
67. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
68. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
69. Who are the Government transparency improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
70. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
71. Is the scope of Government transparency defined?
<--- Score
72. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
73. Are the Government transparency requirements complete?
<--- Score
74. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
75. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
76. Is Government transparency currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
77. What sources do you use to gather information for a Government transparency study?
<--- Score
78. Who approved the Government transparency scope?
<--- Score
79. Will team members perform Government transparency work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
80. How do you hand over Government transparency context?
<--- Score
81. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
82. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
83. What is the scope of the Government transparency work?
<--- Score
84. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
85. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
86. Are the Government transparency requirements testable?
<--- Score
87. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
88. Are accountability and ownership for Government transparency clearly defined?
<--- Score
89. How did the Government transparency manager receive input to the development of a Government transparency improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
90. What system do you use for gathering Government transparency information?
<--- Score
91. What is in scope?
<--- Score
92. Are improvement team members fully trained on Government transparency?
<--- Score
93. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
94. What are the Government transparency tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
95. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
96. Do you have a Government transparency success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
97. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
98. What gets examined?
<--- Score
99. Is Government transparency linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
100. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
101. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
102. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
103. Is there a Government transparency management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
104. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
105. Why are you doing Government transparency and what is the scope?
<--- Score
106. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
107. What was the context?
<--- Score
108. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
109. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
110. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
111. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
112. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
113. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
114. Has the Government transparency work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
115. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
116. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
117. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
118.