<--- Score
64. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
65. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
66. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
67. How do you catch Automotive Safety Integrity Level definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
68. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
69. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
70. How would you define Automotive Safety Integrity Level leadership?
<--- Score
71. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
72. What is the scope of the Automotive Safety Integrity Level effort?
<--- Score
73. What Automotive Safety Integrity Level services do you require?
<--- Score
74. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
75. Are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements complete?
<--- Score
76. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
77. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
78. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
79. Are complex designs required for safety?
<--- Score
80. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
81. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
82. What is the definition of Automotive Safety Integrity Level excellence?
<--- Score
83. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
84. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?
<--- Score
85. What is the scope of Automotive Safety Integrity Level?
<--- Score
86. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
87. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
88. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
89. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
90. How do you keep the different kinds of safety-related requirements consistent?
<--- Score
91. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
92. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
93. What system do you use for gathering Automotive Safety Integrity Level information?
<--- Score
94. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
95. How do you think the partners involved in Automotive Safety Integrity Level would have defined success?
<--- Score
96. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
97. Who are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
98. What was the context?
<--- Score
99. What are the enforcement methods used by regulators under the safety case?
<--- Score
100. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
101. Has the Automotive Safety Integrity Level work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
102. Does system satisfy technical system safety requirements?
<--- Score
103. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
104. Is there a clear Automotive Safety Integrity Level case definition?
<--- Score
105. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Automotive Safety Integrity Level results are met?
<--- Score
106. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
107. Is there a Automotive Safety Integrity Level management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
108. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
109. What defines best in class?
<--- Score
110. How does the Automotive Safety Integrity Level manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
111. What sources do you use to gather information for a Automotive Safety Integrity Level study?
<--- Score
112. Who is gathering information?
<--- Score
113. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Automotive Safety Integrity Level? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
114. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
116.