<--- Score
60. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
61. Have all basic functions of Human Resources for Health been defined?
<--- Score
62. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
63. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
64. Are accountability and ownership for Human Resources for Health clearly defined?
<--- Score
65. Is the Human Resources for Health scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
66. What is the scope?
<--- Score
67. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
68. What information do you gather?
<--- Score
69. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
70. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
71. What gets examined?
<--- Score
72. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
73. How will the Human Resources for Health team and the group measure complete success of Human Resources for Health?
<--- Score
74. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
75. Why are you doing Human Resources for Health and what is the scope?
<--- Score
76. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
77. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
78. Will team members regularly document their Human Resources for Health work?
<--- Score
79. What Human Resources for Health services do you require?
<--- Score
80. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Human Resources for Health?
<--- Score
81. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
82. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
83. Has the Human Resources for Health work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
84. Will a Human Resources for Health production readiness review be required?
<--- Score
85. How do you think the partners involved in Human Resources for Health would have defined success?
<--- Score
86. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
87. Are the Human Resources for Health requirements testable?
<--- Score
88. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
89. Is there a Human Resources for Health management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
90. Are improvement team members fully trained on Human Resources for Health?
<--- Score
91. What is the definition of Human Resources for Health excellence?
<--- Score
92. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
93. How do you manage changes in Human Resources for Health requirements?
<--- Score
94. Are the Human Resources for Health requirements complete?
<--- Score
95. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
96. How did the Human Resources for Health manager receive input to the development of a Human Resources for Health improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
97. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Human Resources for Health results are met?
<--- Score
98. Is the Human Resources for Health scope manageable?
<--- Score
99. Do you have a Human Resources for Health success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
100. Is Human Resources for Health linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
101. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
102. Do you all define Human Resources for Health in the same way?
<--- Score
103. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
104. What Human Resources for Health requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
105. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Human Resources for Health goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
106. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
107. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
108. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
109. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
110. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
111. What is in scope?
<--- Score
112. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?