6
Имеет смысл обратить внимание на то обстоятельство, что и система грантовой поддержки исследований, по крайней мере так, как она организована в наших крупнейших фондах – РФФИ и РГНФ, – в целом тоже ориентирована на статью как основной результат исследовательской деятельности. Это только усиливает асимметрию, затрудняющую проведение фундаментальных исследований в гуманитарных науках.
7
From Science and Society to Science in Society: Towards a Framework for 'Co-Operative Research'. Report of a European Commission Workshop Governance and Scientific Advice Unit of DG RTD, Directorate C2 Directorate General Research and Technology Development, Brussels 24th – 25th November 2005.
8
Global Governance of Science. Report of the Expert Group on Global Governance of Science to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission. Brussels, 2009.
9
Global Governance of Science, р. 9.
10
Engaging Science: Thoughts, deeds, analysis and action. Ed. By John Turney. Wellcome trust, 2006.
11
Wolfendale Committee (1995). Final report. London: Office of Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.dti.gov.uk/ost/ostbusiness/puset/report.htm
12
Council for Science and Technology (2005). Universal ethical code for scientists: Consultation letter and code. P. 4. Retrieved from www.cst.gov.uk/cst/business/files/ethicalcode-letter.pdf.
13
См.: House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. Science and Society. Third Report of Session 1999–2000. (HL 38) London: The Stationery Office; 2000. www.publications. parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm [accessed 5 June 2006].
14
См.: House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. Science and Society. Third Report of Session 1999–2000. (HL 38) London: The Stationery Office, 2000. Р. 14.
15
Там же.
16
См., напр.: «From PUS to PEST», Science, vol. 298, 4th October 2002. Р. 49; Nico Pitrelli. The crisis of the «Public Understanding of Science» in Great Britain. JCOM 2 (1), March 2003. P. 1–9.
17
Леонтьев А.Н. Деятельность, сознание, личность. Изд. 2-е. М.: Политиздат, 1977. С. 210.
18
http://www.singaporestatement.org/Translations/SS_Russian.pdf
19
http://www.wcri2013.org/Montreal_Statement_e.shtml
20
Nicholas H. Steneck. ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Washington, D.C.: Dept. of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of Public Health and Science, Office of Research Integrity, 2003. р. 12.
21
Integrity in Research – a Rationale for Community Action //, see: http://ec.europa. eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/integrity-in-research-ec-ex-pert-group-final-report_en.pdf.
22
Integrity in Research – a Rationale for Community Action…
23
См. Brian C. Martinson, Melissa S. Anderson, Raymond de Vries. Scientists behaving badly // Nature, 435, 737–738 (9 June 2005).
24
FP7 – 2007–2013 webpage (http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html).
25
Federal Policy on Research Misconduct // http://www.ostp.gov/cs/federal_policy_ on_research_misconduct.
26
См. там же.
27
Steneck Nicholas. Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions // Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 12. № 1. March 2006. p. 53–74.
28
См.: Kelly L. Wester; John T. Willse; Mark S. Davis. Responsible Conduct of Research Measure: Initial Development and Pilot Study // Accountability in Research. Vol. 15. Issue 2 April 2008. р. 87–104.
29
James Hicks. Opinion: Ethics Training in Science; The NIH has required researchers to receive instruction about responsible conduct for more than 20 years, but misconduct is still on the rise // TheScientist.com. May 14, 2013.
30
Там же.
31
http://www.polit.ru/article/2012/11/09/ostrovki-nauki-rbk/
32
Там же.
33
Юдин