Friends and Enemies: Our Need to Love and Hate. Dorothy Rowe. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Dorothy Rowe
Издательство: HarperCollins
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Общая психология
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9780007466368
Скачать книгу
Association revealed that 93 per cent of pet owners questioned bought their pet a Christmas present, and more than half the pets also received Christmas cards?11

      Friends as friends and lovers as friends might be difficult but what about family? Can family be friends?

      Alice was very clear that people as friends were different from family as friends. When I asked her if Miles was a friend she immediately answered yes, but when I pointed out to her that she hadn’t included him in her list of friends she said, ‘Well, he’s my brother.’

      ‘And what’s the difference between being a friend friend and being a brother friend?’

      ‘Well, he’s living with you. Friends don’t live with you, and brothers do. Eli’s my friend too.’ Eli was then only a few weeks old but he was fascinated with Alice and no doubt regarded her as a friend.

      I asked, ‘Is Mummy your friend?’

      ‘Sort of. In the middle, I think.’

      ‘In the middle of what?’

      ‘In the middle means a bit of my friend – half. Half of my friend.’

      Her mother Jo looked stricken.

      I asked, ‘Is Daddy your friend?’

      ‘Yes. Daddy’s my friend.’

      We went on to talk about enemies and then Jo, who was cooking, asked Alice why she did not think Mummy was a friend. Alice went over to Jo and, smiling broadly, started thumping her. She said, ‘Mummy, sometimes you shout at me and say I’m horrible.’

      I said, ‘You’re banging into Mummy now. Does that mean you’re not her friend? If you hit Mummy, are you being a friend to her?’

      Alice went on smiling and thumping Jo. She said confidently, ‘She likes it.’

      That’s the kind of logic which families use.

      When I asked Miles if Alice was his friend he said, ‘Some of the time she is but some of the time she isn’t.’ However, when he went on to consider the matter he decided that Alice was his friend even though she did not always do what he wanted her to do.

      I asked Miles if Mummy was a friend. He said most emphatically, ‘Yes,’ but went on, ‘Most of the time, except when she gets cross.’

      ‘Is Daddy a friend?’

      Miles’s ‘Yes’ was more hesitant so I said, ‘You seemed like you weren’t too sure about that.’

      ‘Well, I was going to say that my dad’s a bit harsh on my mum because he makes her seem to be the baddie. He’s always threatening us with things like ‘Quick, get into the bath before your mum comes up.’

      ‘And what do you think of that?’

      ‘I don’t think it’s nice. I wouldn’t like it if I was made the baddie all the time.’

      ‘Do you think your mum and dad are friends with one another?’

      ‘Yes, or they wouldn’t have married and I wouldn’t probably be alive.’

      Miles and Alice illustrate the perils parents face if they take their children’s point of view seriously and allow them to express their opinions. Such children do not hesitate to criticize their parents. But Miles and Alice also reveal the security which they take for granted like the air they breathe. They can criticize their parents, and everyone can get cross and shout at one another, but it is never more than a storm in a teacup, and the teacup is rock solid.

      Not all families are like that. I asked my workshop participants, ‘Can family be friends?’ Here are some of their replies:

      • ‘No. What prevents them being friends is trust. I cannot trust them with my emotions. My parents never respected my feelings and I could no more trust them now than I could as a child. We do not relate our feelings to each other.’

      • ‘We have totally different value systems.’

      • ‘I love my son but he is not my friend. The relationship is one-sided. I love my daughter and she is a friend. We have a supporting relationship.’

      • ‘I can’t say that anyone in my family was a friend. My mother was particularly forbidding, full of repressed anger and without humour.’

      • ‘I would like to think this is so but know that it is not because we come from the same situations with similar knowledge but different feelings.’

      • ‘Many of my family will only accept me very conditionally and I am not willing to sacrifice myself in order to be accepted by them.’

      • ‘Blood’s thicker than water because you share the same history and are used to familiar relationships. But it is harder to set yourself free.’

      • ‘I have a sister I haven’t spoken to for several years because she hurt me many times. I feel it is safer for me not to have a friendship with her.’

      • ‘I love my brothers but wouldn’t call them friends. There’s no one in my family I share myself with deeply.’

      • ‘Sometimes it’s difficult for a relative to be a friend because they can’t stand back from the situation. They get too involved and emotional.’

      • ‘I do not see all members of my family as friends but maybe members of the same tribe. Some are friends: all are friendly.’

      • ‘Blood’s bloodier than water.’

      Andrew Sullivan considered the question of friends and family:

      Families and marriages fail too often because they are trying to answer too many human needs. A spouse is required to be a lover, a friend, a mother, a father, a soulmate, a co-worker, and so on. Few people can be all these things for one person. And when the demands are set too high, disappointment can only follow. If husbands and wives have deeper and stronger friendships outside the marital unit, the marriage has more space to breathe and fewer burdens to bear. Likewise, a lack of true family can, I think, impinge on friendship. If we have many friends and no real family, we tend to demand things of friends which are equally inappropriate. The two relationships, then, family and friendship, are surely rivals, but they are also complements to one another. There is no reason why most human lives should not have a deep experience of both.12

      That is a wonderful aspiration, but many of us fail to achieve it. I used to think that some people have a talent for friendship but now I am not so sure. I have learned that when people speak of the wonders of universal love, or of spirituality, or of caring for others, or of friendship I should look at what these people actually do. I have worked as a visiting lecturer for far too many charity, psychotherapy and counselling groups where all the talk was of how much they care about other people but where that ‘other people’ did not include me. In their eyes I had no needs like being fed, being protected from importunate members of the audience, assisted with transport or simply given a glass of water. The world is full of people who believe that to say you do something is the same as doing it. St Paul did say that the thought is the same as the deed, which probably explains why I have found so many Christians prone to such oversights.

      Even when someone does show all the behaviours we might associate with having a talent for friendship I have found it necessary to ask the person whether that is so.

      My friend Una seemed to me to have a talent for friendship. She had retired from a long and distinguished academic career in psychology. I doubt that there would be many of her erstwhile students who did not consider her to be a friend, while in the often bitchy world of professional psychology in Australia she had no enemies and masses of friends.

      Una remembered and kept up with the events in her friends’ lives. She always kept a photographic record of us, pictures which she kept in albums on the coffee table beside the couch where she read her beloved newspapers. Her passion