Cultural DNA. Bains Gurnek

when the experimenters showed a hand that had been painted purple being pricked, the relevant neuronal system dutifully fired in the expected manner. The failure of the mirror neurons to react to the black hand, therefore, reflects an awareness on the part of the white subjects that it belonged to someone from another race. Interestingly, those who scored highly on a test of unconscious bias showed virtually no mirror neuron activation in the case of the black hand being pricked.25 Numerous studies have replicated these findings across different groups, and the suppression of neuronal empathy when one observes other groups is now an established fact. This research is saddening, but it does start to make sense of huge swathes of our sorry, human intergroup history – slavery, the Holocaust and Rwanda to mention but a few. This research also indicates that one of the core objectives of this book – the development of intergroup empathy – is not an irrelevant or unimportant task in our global world.

      A second objective of the appreciative approach to difference that is the focus of this book is to get people to question their implicit hierarchies. It is natural if you come from countries that are prosperous to develop a view of your superiority; sometimes this can be overtly held but, more commonly, it is an implicit view that is best not aired in public. Conversely, those at the other end of the spectrum often develop an unconscious sense of inferiority or inadequacy – although, again, this is not necessarily obvious on the surface, as many people from the cultures that are “on the back foot” express an overt sense of nationalism, pride, and display a surface confidence that may not always run particularly deep. I suspect that when you lift the lid, the underlying reality is that Westerners still feel superior and people from other cultures are playing a psychological game of catch-up in terms of their confidence and self-esteem. In fact, this is exactly what the work on unconscious biases cited earlier illustrates.

      One of the motivations for writing this book is to attempt to level the playing field. While the analysis of the DNA of European and American societies identifies some clear attributes that have given these societies an edge over others in the past, it also unearths certain profound weaknesses that these societies must address if they are to retain their edge. Moreover, one – although not the sole – factor that has given Western societies an edge over others is their historical capacity for organized violence against other ethnic groups – something which I will argue is embedded more in the DNA of the West for a variety of reasons than some other world cultures. This is something that will be increasingly difficult for Western societies to leverage in today's world. In short, while other societies can learn something from those aspects of Western society that have led them to be successful, they do not have to be intimidated by their success.

      However, if other societies are truly to catch up, they need to appreciate both the underlying strengths that are also the limitations that their own cultural DNA creates for them in the emerging new world. While I have tried to stay positive, some parts of my analysis for all societies will make for uncomfortable reading. In fact, I suspect that most people will agree with the analysis of other cultures but likely become sensitive about certain aspects of their own. This is not just because people only want to hear positives about themselves – which is, to some extent, true. In a very real and profound sense, one's own way of looking at the world feels like the only way, because everyone around you shares it. It is difficult to step out and question your core beliefs from inside your own frame of reference. However, as we have found in our work with individuals and organizations, an honest external mirror is often what is needed to move forward.

      Having apologized in advance for likely reactions – it is time to move on to the analysis of each culture. We start our journey by examining the United States, as the relatively recent movement of people to the continent can be tracked with greater certainty, and the arguments help to illustrate principles we will use later. We then move to Sub-Saharan Africa, where the human journey began, and track the movement of people from our common home to different regions in the world.

      Chapter 1

      America – The Change Makers

      America today is still the world's most powerful country, both in terms of the size of its economy and its military muscle. Even more important than this, however, is the soft power that the country exercises. In particular, after America and its allies won the Cold War, there was an implicit sense in many parts of the world that American values and ideals would become the global norm. It was this sense that persuaded the political economist Francis Fukuyama to prematurely call out the End of History, on the basis that fundamental debates about values were over and we were all marching toward an American future whether we recognized it or not.26

      The American model also seemed to have triumphed in business. The idea that free markets should create the champions of the future through Darwinian selection became widely embedded. Other notions took hold, too: push relentlessly for ever higher targets and differentiate aggressively on the basis of performance; never rest from change; let companies outsource to the lowest cost providers around the world. American executives who went abroad did so on the front foot and led predominantly through American leadership values. The country's business schools were also teaching leaders from around the world how to manage their companies and American heroes, such as Jack Welch and Louis Gerstner, were the doyens of the global business community.

      Just a few decades later, however, the world looks very different. American business values are no longer the default setting for executives around the world. The global financial crisis that struck in 2007 has had a particularly significant impact on the credibility of the American business model. A short while ago, America's banks, ratings agencies and insurance companies were seen as highly sophisticated operators in complex markets. Now many believe they had either no idea of what they were doing or were malevolently self-serving – neither judgment is flattering. While the American reward culture has created enormous wealth for some, many feel senior leaders have been excessively rewarded, often for indifferent performance. The model is also under question internally. Decades of economic growth have barely touched the living standards of the bulk of the American population and there is a sense of weariness and latent resentment among many in the workforce. Outsourcing may have benefited company profits – but whole sectors of American society have lost out or live on the precipice of insecurity.

      American leaders wrestling with lower economic growth at home must think globally, now more than ever before. However, they can no longer go around the world simply teaching other people how to sing the American business tune. They have to adjust to a multipolar business world with all its complexities and contradictions. This requires American leaders to understand other cultures and flex their own approach as never before. On a day-to-day level, an American executive has to deal with a bewildering range of nationalities either within a firm or in global markets. Increasingly there is a good chance your boss will be from a culture with which you have had only fleeting experience before.

      More generally, America has lost its sense of omnipotence. People around the world instinctively recognize that other ideologies and values for how life should be organized are now on offer. In America itself, this has created a sense of ambivalence and uncertainty. American exceptionalism has always been deeply rooted in the national psyche; as such, the idea that others could genuinely overtake the country – rather than pretend to and then fade away, as did the Soviet Union or Japan – causes disquiet. America is in an uncertain mood where, psychologically, a lot of things are up in the air. The rest of the world is equally uncertain as to how Americans will adjust to a new multipolar world. Which of the myriad of potentially conflicting values that constitute its cultural soup will get stronger and which will get weaker?