12. Dancer, High-relief, Sandstone, Height 84 cm, Thâp-Mam style, 12th – 13th Century.
Epigraphy offers two inscriptions in Sanskrit, one dated to 658 that was found in central Vietnam in Quang Nam (C96, stele found near My Son E6), the other dated to 668 that was found in Cambodia (the Kdei Ang inscription), that use the term “Champa” for the first time. A description of primitive Lin Yi, its religion, its language or languages, its inhabitants – this all remains under study.
What is better known is the history of the country from the eighth century to, on one hand, the end of Hindu Champa in 1471 when Vijaya fell, and, on the other hand, the period from 1471 to 1832: a slow irregular decline that, from the loss of Kauthara to the annihilation of Panduranga, led to the historically exact conclusion that Champa, as a state, no longer existed. From 1832 on, it was thus part of the conquering, structured, Vietnamese nation, inscribed in frontiers that barely changed until our times with the integration of the Mekong delta.
In the eighth century, then, Champa stretched from the Gate of Annam in the north to the Donnai basin in the south. Probably organised as a confederate state, it was divided into what seem to be principalities, consisting of alluvial plains scored by mountain chains plunging into the sea, called, from north to south, Indrapura, Amaravati, Vijaya, Kauthara and Panduranga. The history of Champa is not only that of the Viet-Cham couple: The country had relations with China of which it was a vassal, to which it paid a tribute and to which it sent ambassadors; with Cambodia, which rapidly (as of the ninth century) became warlike as they did with the Malay world, principally Java, or with the Dai Viet. All these relations were multiple: belligerent, commercial but also matrimonial and, above all, unstable. From the eighth to the fifteenth centuries, Cham civilisation was mainly Hindu (without forgetting Buddhism – essentially in sculpture – from the end of the ninth and the beginning of the tenth centuries), which is to say that it borrowed from India its cults, principally that of Shiva, its language, Sanskrit, its social structure (four classes) and its concept of royalty. An aristocratic elite guaranteed the political, economic and social systems. As for the population, it was composed of farmers, pioneers in aquatic rice cultivation (the variety of rice with a short growth cycle – 100 days – that was born in Champa acted as an important factor in agricultural progress once introduced to southern China in the thirteenth century); merchants who exported sandalwood, cinnamon, rhinoceros horns, elephant tusks; ceramic artisans, specialists in glazing especially from the twelfth to the fifteenth centuries as witnessed by the productions of Go Sanh whose site is near An Nhon, but also sailors who, from the two great ports Tai Chiem (Hoi An region) and Thai Nai (in Binh Dinh) traded or pirated them depending on the period and the demand…
It goes without saying that this social framework was continuously weakened from top to bottom by the various offensive or defensive combats that the Chams had to wage. The first were against the Chinese who tried several times to enlarge their empire toward the south from conquered Annam (“the pacified south” was the highly condescending Chinese name for the Vietnam of those times) and who, to do this, undertook battles that were often victorious. For example, we know that about 446, Tra Kieu, the Cham capital, was devastated by the Chinese general Tan Hezhi who pillaged statues of gold worth a total of 100,000 taels of pure gold, or about 3.6 tons of metal… The second were against the Javanese who destroyed the Po Nagar temple in Nha Trang in 774 and another temple near Vira Pura (the “heroic city”), meaning probably near Phan Rang in the south in 787. But what were only attempts became, as of the tenth century due to the unendurable population increase of the north, a slow but steady devastating southerly push, which culminated in the annihilation of Hindu Champa as witnessed by the destruction of Vijaya by the Dai Viet in 1471.
13. Brahman, High-relief, Sandstone, Height 72 cm, My Son E1 style, 7th – 8th Century.
A Brahman is a member of the highest of the four classes (“varna”, meaning “colour” in Sanskrit) of Brahmanical India. Priests responsible for sacrifices are chosen from this class. Granted numerous privileges, they devoted themselves to the study of the Vedas and other sacred texts as well as to religious ceremonies. This sculpture is one of the elements of a pedestal that, given the size of the blocks, must have been the support for either a monumental linga (such as the one in the centre of the My Son E1 temple) or a no less monumental divinity. The niche occupied by the Brahman has a threshold decorated with a rosette and garlands. Notice the wide, lowered arcature topped by a rosette and completed by mouldings. The Brahman is in anjali and wearing a sampot that hangs very low (almost to his ankles) and held by two belts. The mukhuta is shaped like a hood with a diadem bearing three large rosettes. The long ears are enhanced with jewellery.
14. Map of Champa indicating archeological sites.
15. The principal Cham sites (towers, ruins…)
16. Head of Vishnu, Sandstone, height 25 cm, Khmer art, 9th – 10th Century.
In fact, in the year 1000, given the threat of the tyrannical Dai Viet who were independent after gaining freedom from Chinese occupation, the Chams moved their capital city, leaving Indrapura (destroyed in 982) for Vijaya, much further south, in the territory that is today the province of Binh Dinh. What followed were only battles, most often lost. In 1044, the Viets took Vijaya and killed the monarch; in 1068 they captured the Cham king Rudravarman III who, a year later, exchanged his freedom for lands that became, under the reign of the Viet sovereign Ly Thanh Tong, the provinces (“chau” in Viet) Dia Ly, Ma Linh and Bo Chinh, definitely amputating the kingdom of Champa of its northern part.
The Chams also regularly had to fight the Khmers, defeated in 1074 and 1080, but victorious in 1145 when they took Vijaya. Combat between Khmers and Chams carried on for, all told, almost 150 years (from 1074 to 1220).
Other than the Viets, Khmers, and Javanese, the Chams were subjected to Mongol assaults: in 1238 Sagatou, coming out of conquered China (the Mongols had installed the Yuan dynasty there that ruled China until the arrival of the Mings in 1368), decided to invade Champa. Refusing any confrontation, the Chams took refuge in the mountains where, for two years, they waited for the occupiers to withdraw. If to all this are added the fratricide struggles of the second half of the twelfth century between the allied principalities of Amaravati and Panduranga and that of Vijaya, it is easy to understand the fragility in which Champa found itself at the beginning of the fourteenth century. But does the fragility of a state justify the frivolity of a sovereign? Can passionate love take the place of politics? In 1306, the sovereign Jaya Simhavarman III proposed to the king of Dai Viet – who accepted the offer – the provinces of O and Li in return for the hand of his daughter, princess Huyen Tran; thus, the entire region between the Lao Bao col and the Col of Clouds, between Hue and Tourane became – peacefully, for once – Vietnamese territory. It must be added that this Cham sovereign died less than a year after the arrival of the princess and that this territory, despite several attempts, was never recovered. All to the contrary: as of 1307, the names of districts were changed and O became Thuan (“submission”) and Li became Hoa (“transformation”). Gentle omens… Nevertheless, a respite of several dozens of years was offered by another monarch, Che Bong Nga, who, having come to the throne about 1360, undertook a whole series of successful military campaigns that brought him as far as the capture of Thang Long (today’s Hanoi) and allowed him to deal with all the Viet counterattacks and even kill their