* * *
Geometrically, space is easiest to imagine in the form of a spheresince the radius in all directions is “equal to infinity’. The absence of space limits is beyond doubt, since space is realized through “Consciousness” as a wave function. Given the fundamental and direct contact with reality, Space, as we understand, has a unique and amazing property that is not inherent in objects, namely: it has no properties, dimensions, and is potentially infinite. Being the basis for the realization of objects in the conditions of reality, space is fundamental;
fig. 2
(the Point in the center of space is “I”)
The Systemic Function of Space is realized partially, as needed, when we are present and pay attention. The boundary of Space will retreat when approaching it, that is, Space is infinite, but – precisely preliminary. For example, if you fly to the “Nearest Star”, need to realize the “pre-existing space”, and fly at the speed of light for years, or billions of years;
With such a structure (of the system), the dimensions cannot be an obstacle, and do not have much significance, as well as time, therefore – anything is realized equally simply and instantly, a glass, trees and a cluster of galaxies. However, to study and gain experience, the dynamics of these objects and the situation – a process in time and space are necessary;
With constant attention -> in the direction of a specific point of concentration, the function of the realization of Space is interpreted and presented as an endless cycle, with expansion in all directions and moving away from the center – at the speed of light, as is appropriate in these conditions;
* * *
No, of course we are not in the matrix, and this is not a computer program. There is no point in creating this at the risk of making a mistake – everything works fine as is. Yes, for better understanding, we sometimes use terms and words “software, program, processor, etc.” implying the structure and functionality of a living being – scientifically proven at the level of physical processes, which we have been observing and successfully studying for hundreds of years.
This is not a vain and greatest work – with one caveat – we studied the “Contemplated”, but not the external, but only the structure of the images visible to us (“things”), a kind of “Parade of Illumination of Elementary Particles”. With such a structure, it is not at all surprising that objects, when they are very close, consist of particles that do not touch each other <ephemeral, by the way>, that is why everything is so complex, literally – like the entire volume of physics, because it (physics) studies precisely this “enchanting phenomenon”;
* * *
There can be no talk of external physical reality, we have reliably established this and repeated it more than once, but for ease of application in our research, it is necessary to understand many principles (seemingly obvious);
We propose to formulate from what is already known:
The Real Status of an object is its visible Status, corresponding to the current state – “an object with imposed experience”, and according to the new existing conditions;
Here, the concept of “Status” implies an ephemeral, but concrete state of the Idea of an object, in relation to other objects in a related situation, and according to strictly defined conditions. If the change in the state of an object is expressed by a wave function, then the point of attention (concentration) will always correspond to a specific moment of realization, and then the point seems to move along the wave of change of the object. In reality, we see a static state at a specific point, and each subsequent moment is different, at the next point, and then the next, and so on… The object, in this case, is contemplated as dynamic in all respects, both inside and outside.
It is necessary to clarify the following about the contemplated moment – the really visible state represents precisely the final condition, that is, the state in which the object has already been completely transformed, and will be available in experience in a new state. We understand It as two-component: Idea + Wave of state; Looking at a fresh apple on the table implies Its Idea – this is the Apple Itself and + Condition of changing the state of a specific object, taking into account all factors. Let’s say we put an Apple on the table at home, and went on a trip for six months. When we return and, remembering the apple, look at the table, we will see a rotten (half-decomposed), but already dry apple. That is, the Idea + the Condition that in an environment with room temperature, the apple will turn into what we saw after returning. In the given example, the conditions will be your experience in which apples spoil. Even if you did not see how the apple changed in the process, but a point on the wave of its state will not cause an error, based on the relationship of many, many factors in this situation, including physics, chemistry, biology, etc. If there is a Hamster in the house, in a cage, and he suddenly escapes, then the Entity will take it into account as a condition, then the Apple will most likely be eaten. The probability, which we call “most likely” will include the behavior of the Hamster, his intelligence, ability and opportunity to climb on the table, … and so on;
fig. 3
Let us imagine a wave of each object, a supposed “frame of reality”, i.e. in one range of events and data on states, penetrated by a beam of the system function, perpendicularly “touching” one point of each wave, but corresponding to the moment – exposing what is contemplated in the form of a sensory result of processing, in the internal volume of the virtual 3D sphere of the contemplated reality (see fig. 3This is the final state of the transformation process: between the existing state of objects (in the situation) previously available in memory, and the state of already transformed objects, through the imposition of experience, which is stored as new experience. The point of attention has no relation to time, but represents a point “on a conditional scale” of the dynamic state of an object, as a process of transforming its past state into the future (if this is clearer). This does not prevent us from using time as a method of measuring relations, quantities, parameters and states (this is what happens), then – the point of the real moment on the “time scale” corresponds to some specific point of state on the “scale of the state of the object”, but this is not the same thing at all – these are different scales considered at the same moment, albeit correlative, but conditionally. That is – according to an intentionally created, specific condition:
Time is a method of measuring relationships in real conditions accepted in a particular “Society’;
It is necessary to explain that in order to understand some (many) Laws, Truths, “things”, we are forced to consider them, breaking them down into successive chains, although these elements are phenomena of a non-physical nature, and since we do not have suitable tools of knowledge, except for those we use, then assuming “criticism outside attempts at understanding’ – we will continue without apology.
The moment of reality seems to roll on the waves of experience and events, directly dependent on the intention of the “I”. If the temporal reality is an abstract boundary between the past and the future, then it is also a moment of transition, when the “future time” changes its status to “past”;
The temporal extension of the “reality frame” cannot be measured, it does not exist. Consequently, anything dynamic, contemplated is unique and cannot be repeated