A Course in Luminescence Measurements and Analyses for Radiation Dosimetry. Stephen W. S. McKeever. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Stephen W. S. McKeever
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Физика
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119646921
Скачать книгу
relating to the potential energy in the vicinity of the defect, the wavefunctions for the trapped and delocalized states, the density of states in the delocalized band, and the degree of phonon interaction. For a shallow (hydrogenic) electron trap:

      sigma Subscript p Baseline left-parenthesis upper E right-parenthesis proportional-to StartFraction left-parenthesis h v minus upper E Subscript o Baseline right-parenthesis Superscript three-halves Baseline Over left-parenthesis h v right-parenthesis Superscript 5 Baseline EndFraction comma (2.15)

      where E=hv is the energy of the stimulating light (Blakemore and Rahimi 1984; Landsberg 2003). The coulombic attraction between the freed electron and the ionized defect is ignored when hv is just larger than Eo. The cross-section reaches its maximum at hv=1.4 Eo.

      For deep traps, Lucovsky (1964) approximated the potential in the region of the defect to a delta function and assumed a plane wave excited-state wavefunction to derive:

      The cross-section reaches a maximum at hv=2Eo, and the coulombic field is taken into account.

      A further assumption in the derivation of Equation (2.16) is that the effective mass me* of the electron in the conduction band can be used also for the electron in the localized state. By using the electron rest mass mo instead of me* while the electron is localized, Grimmeis and Ledebo (1975a, 1975b) derived:

      also using a plane-wave final state and the assumption of parabolic bands.

      By taking into account strong phonon coupling between the lattice and the trapped electron, Noras (1980) (see also Chruścińska 2010) derived:

      The parameter ϵ is a dummy variable having the dimensions of energy, and a = 5/2 or 3/2 for forbidden and allowed transitions, respectively. The parameter κ is given by:

      kappa equals left-bracket 2 upper S left-parenthesis h v Subscript p h Baseline right-parenthesis squared hyperbolic cotangent left-parenthesis StartFraction h v Subscript p h Baseline Over 2 k upper T EndFraction right-parenthesis right-bracket Superscript negative one-half Baseline comma (2.19)

      where again S is the Huang-Rhys factor and hvph is the energy of the phonon vibrational mode.

      For a purely electronic transition (no phonon coupling):

      Several other expressions for σp(E) also exist (Jaros 1977; Blakemore and Rahimi 1984; Ridley 1988; Böer 1990; Landsberg 2003).

      Figure 2.009 (a) Examples of postulated photoionization cross-sections as a function of stimulation energy. In this depiction, all curves are normalized to their maximum value and the optical trap depth is Eo = 2.25 eV. (b) Example photoionization cross-sections when phonon coupling is allowed. In this figure, the Huang-Rhys factor S is 10 and the temperature is 300 K. Curves corresponding to two values for Eo are illustrated, each with two curve shapes corresponding to values of hvph of 20 meV (dashed lines) and 40 meV (full lines). (Adapted from Chrus´cin´ska 2010.)

      Exercise 2.2

      From the literature, look up as many expressions as you can find for the photoionization cross-section σp(E). Plot each and compare shapes. Discuss and explain the differences, assumptions, limitations, etc.

      2.2.2 Trapping and Recombination Processes

      Considering only the recombination of free electrons with trapped holes, the rate of SRH recombination can be seen to be dependent on the free electron density, the density of trapped holes, and the temperature. The free carrier lifetime τ of an electron or a hole can be expressed as:

       Скачать книгу