94 Nation, K. (2005). Children's Reading Comprehension Difficulties. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 248–265). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch14.
95 Nation, K. (2017). Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. npj Science of Learning, 2(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1038/s41539‐017‐0004‐7.
96 Nation, K. (2019). Children’s reading difficulties, language, and reflections on the simple view of reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 47–73. doi: 10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272.
97 Nieuwland, M. S. (2019). Do “early” brain responses reveal word form prediction during language comprehension? A critical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 96, 367–400. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.019.
98 Nieuwland, M. S., Barr, D. J., Bartolozzi, F., Busch‐Moreno, S., Darley, E., Donaldson, D. I., … & Matthew Husband, E. (2020). Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: Evidence from a large‐scale study using brain potentials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 375(1791), 20180522. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0522.
99 Nieuwland, M. S., & van Berkum, J. J. (2006). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1098–1111. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1098.
100 Noordenbos, M. W., & Serniclaes, W. (2015). The categorical perception deficit in dyslexia: A meta‐analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(5), 340–359. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1052455.
101 Norris, D. (2013). Models of visual word recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(10), 517–524. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.003.
102 Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2011). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452. doi: 10.1146/annurev‐psych‐120710‐100431.
103 Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 69–92). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
104 O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Lorch Jr, R. F. (Eds.). (2015). Inferences during reading. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107279186.
105 Orton, S. T. (1925). “Word‐blindness” in school children. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 14(5), 581–615. doi: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1925.02200170002001.
106 Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F., Menoncello, L., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., … Frith, U. (2000). A cultural effect on brain function. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 91–96. doi: 10.1038/71163.
107 Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi: 10.4324/9781351236904‐6.
108 Perfetti, C.A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_02.
109 Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. C., & Delaney, S. M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(1), 59–70. doi: 10.1016/0749‐596X(88)90048‐4.
110 Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 296–316. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2013.813828.
111 Perfetti, C. A., & Helder, A. (2020). Incremental comprehension examined in event‐related potentials: Word‐to‐text integration and structure building. Discourse Processes, 58(1), 2–21. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2020.1743806.
112 Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.827687.
113 Perfetti, C. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Epilogue: Universals and particulars in learning to read across seventeen orthographies. In L. Verhoeven & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 455–480). Cambridge University Press.
114 Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: North‐Holland. doi: 10.1016/S0166‐4115(08)62798‐3.
115 Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114(2), 273–315. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295X.114.2.273.
116 Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single‐word processing. Nature, 331, 585–589. doi: 10.1038/331585a0.
117 Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non‐semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processing, 15, 445–485. doi: 10.1080/01690960050119661.
118 Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi‐regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. doi: 10.1037/0033‐295x.103.1.56.
119 Posner, M. I., Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., & Raichle, M. E. (1988). Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. Science, 240, 1627–1631. doi: 10.1126/science.3289116.
120 Pringle‐Morgan, W. (1896). A case of congenital word blindness. British Medical Journal, 2, 1378. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.1871.1378.
121 Pritchard, S. C., Coltheart, M., Marinus, E., & Castles, A. (2016). Modelling the implicit learning of phonological decoding from training on whole‐word spellings and pronunciations. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(1), 49–63. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2015.1085384.
122 Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 29–53. doi: 10.2307/747832.
123 Ramus. F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: Specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212–218. doi: 10.1016/s0959‐4388(03)00035‐7.
124 Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53(2), 97–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.01.002.
125 Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the EZ reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 720–732. doi: 10.1037/0096‐1523.30.4.720.
126 Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74. A supplement to Psychological Science. doi: 10.1111/1529‐1006.00004.
127 Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J. & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements during reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Oxford: Blackwell.
128 Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(2), 275–280. doi: 10.1037/h0027768.
129 Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher,