8 8 Nishimura RA, Edwards WD, Warnes CA, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16(1): 145–154. PubMed PMID: 2193046.
9 9 Velican D, Velican C. Comparative study on age‐related changes and atherosclerotic involvement of the coronary arteries of male and female subjects up to 40 years of age. Atherosclerosis 1981; 38(1‐2): 39–50. PubMed PMID: 7470204.
10 10 Isner JM, Donaldson RF, Fortin AH, et al. Attenuation of the media of coronary arteries in advanced atherosclerosis. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58(10): 937–939. PubMed PMID: 3776849.
11 11 Mintz GS, Painter JA, Pichard AD, et al. Atherosclerosis in angiographically “normal” coronary artery reference segments: an intravascular ultrasound study with clinical correlations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25(7): 1479–1485. PubMed PMID: 7759694.
12 12 Glagov S, Weisenberg E, Zarins CK, et al. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. N Engl J Med 1987; 316(22): 1371–1375. PubMed PMID: 3574413.
13 13 Losordo DW, Rosenfield K, Kaufman J, et al. Focal compensatory enlargement of human arteries in response to progressive atherosclerosis: in vivo documentation using intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 1994; 89(6): 2570–2577. PubMed PMID: 8205666.
14 14 Mintz GS, Kent KM, Pichard AD, et al. Contribution of inadequate arterial remodeling to the development of focal coronary artery stenoses: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1997; 95(7): 1791–1798. PubMed PMID: 9107165.
15 15 Schoenhagen P, Ziada KM, Kapadia SR, et al. Extent and direction of arterial remodeling in stable versus unstable coronary syndromes: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2000; 101(6): 598–603. PubMed PMID: 10673250.
16 16 Inaba S, Mintz GS, Farhat NZ, et al. Impact of positive and negative lesion site remodeling on clinical outcomes: insights from PROSPECT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7(1): 70–78. PubMed PMID: 24433710.
17 17 Wu X, Mintz GS, Xu K, et al. The relationship between attenuated plaque identified by intravascular ultrasound and no‐reflow after stenting in acute myocardial infarction: the HORIZONS‐AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4(5): 495–502. PubMed PMID: 21596321.
18 18 Lee SY, Mintz GS, Kim SY, et al. Attenuated plaque detected by intravascular ultrasound: clinical, angiographic, and morphologic features and post‐percutaneous coronary intervention complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2(1): 65–72. PubMed PMID: 19463400.
19 19 Pu J, Mintz GS, Biro S, et al. Insights into echo‐attenuated plaques, echolucent plaques, and plaques with spotty calcification: novel findings from comparisons among intravascular ultrasound, near‐infrared spectroscopy, and pathological histology in 2,294 human coronary artery segments. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63(21): 2220–2233. PubMed PMID: 24681142.
20 20 Shiono Y, Kubo T, Tanaka A, et al. Impact of attenuated plaque as detected by intravascular ultrasound on the occurrence of microvascular obstruction after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6(8): 847–853. PubMed PMID: 23871509.
21 21 Xu K, Mintz GS, Kubo T, et al. Long‐term follow‐up of attenuated plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound substudy of the HORIZONS‐AMI trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5(2): 185–192. PubMed PMID: 22438429.
22 22 Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. PROSPECT Investigators. A prospective natural‐history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 20; 364(3):226–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):2040. PMID: 21247313.
23 23 Dohi T, Mintz GS, McPherson JA, et al. Non‐fibroatheroma lesion phenotype and long‐term clinical outcomes: a substudy analysis from the PROSPECT study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6(8): 908–916. PubMed PMID: 23850249.
24 24 Calvert PA, Obaid DR, O’Sullivan M, et al. Association between IVUS findings and adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: the VIVA (VH‐ IVUS in Vulnerable Atherosclerosis) Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4(8): 894–901. PubMed PMID: 21835382.
25 25 Souza CF, Maehara A, Mintz GS, et al. Tissue characterization and phenotype classification in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction: Insights from the iWonder study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1; 90(7):1107–1114. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26954. Epub 2017 Feb 13. PMID: 28191713.
26 26 Elvin Kedhi. Combined Optical Coherence Tomography and Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment to BetterPredict Adverse Event Outcomes in DM Patients: COMBINE (OCT–FFR) Trial. Presented at: TCT 2020. October 14, 2020.
27 27 David Erlinge. PROSPECT II: A Prospective Natural History Study Using NIRS‐IVUS Imaging in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Presented at: TCT 2020. October 14, 2020.
28 28 Stone GW, Maehara A, Ali ZA, et al. PROSPECT ABSORB Investigators. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Vulnerable Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Nov 17; 76(20):2289–2301. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.547. Epub 2020 Oct 15. PMID: 33069847.
29 29 Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2‐year follow‐up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56(3): 177–184. PubMed PMID: 20537493.
30 30 De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve‐guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2014; 371(13): 1208–1217. PubMed PMID: 25176289.
31 31 Han JK, Koo BK, Park KW, et al. Optimal intravascular ultrasound criteria for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenosis: an international multicenter study. Cardiology 2014; 127(4): 256–262. PubMed PMID: 24480866.
32 32 Ma YF, Fam JM, Zhang BC. Critical analysis of the correlation between optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve in the management of intermediate coronary artery lesion. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8(5): 6658–6667. PubMed PMID: 26221203. Pubmed Central PMCID: 4509148.
33 33 Waksman R, Legutko J, Singh J, et al. FIRST: Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound Relationship Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61(9): 917–923. PubMed PMID: 23352786.
34 34 Nascimento BR, de Sousa MR, Koo BK, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of intravascular ultrasound‐derived minimal lumen area compared with fractional flow reserve— meta‐analysis: pooled accuracy of IVUS luminal area versus FFR. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 84(3): 377–385. PubMed PMID: 23737441.
35 35 Case BC, Yerasi C, Forrestal BJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound guidance in the evaluation and treatment of left main coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2021 Feb 15; 325:168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.10.008. Epub 2020 Oct 8. PMID: 33039578.
36 36 Ahmed JM, Mintz GS, Weissman NJ, et al. Mechanism of lumen enlargement during intracoronary stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2000; 102(1): 7–10. PubMed PMID: 10880407.
37 37 Maehara A, Takagi A, Okura H, et al. Longitudinal plaque redistribution during stent expansion. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86(10): 1069–1072. PubMed PMID: 11074201.
38 38 Prati F, Pawlowski T, Gil R, et al. Stenting of culprit lesions in unstable angina leads to a marked reduction in plaque burden: a major role of plaque embolization? A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 2003; 107(18): 2320–2305. PubMed PMID: 12707236.
39 39 Guo N, Maehara A, Mintz GS, et al. Incidence, mechanisms, predictors, and clinical impact of acute and late stent malapposition after primary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound substudy of the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONSAMI) trial.