75 75 Nauerth, S., Moll, F., Rau, M. et al. (2013). Air‐to‐ground quantum communication. Nat. Photon. 7 (5): 382–386.
76 76 Vallone, G., Bacco, D., and Dequal, D. (2015, Art. no.). Experimental satellite quantum communications. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (4): 040502.
77 77 Liao, S.K., Cai, W.Q., and Liu, W.Y. (2017). Satellite‐to‐ground quantum key distribution. Nature 549 (7670): 43–47.
78 78 Liao, S.‐K. et al. (2017). Long‐distance free‐space quantum key distribution in daylight towards inter‐satellite communication. Nat. Photon. 11 (8): 509–513.
79 79 Liao, S.‐K., Cai, W.‐Q., and Handsteiner, J. (2018). Satellite‐relayed intercontinental quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (3): 030501.
80 80 Bacsardi, L. (2013). On the way to quantum‐based satellite communication. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51 (8): 50–55.
81 81 Simon, C. (2017). Towards a global quantum network. Nat. Photon 11 (11): 678–680.
82 82 P. Wang, X. Zhang, and G. Chen, “Quantum key distribution for security guarantees over quantum‐repeater‐based QoS‐driven 3d satellite networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf., Dec. 2014, pp. 728–733.
83 83 Bedington, R., Arrazola, J.M., and Ling, A. (2017). Progress in satellite quantum key distribution. NPJ Quantum Inf. 3 (1): 30.
84 84 M. Pfennigbauer, W. Leeb, and M. Aspelmeyer, “Free‐space optical quantum key distribution using intersatellite links,” in Proc. CNESIntersatellite Link Workshop, 2003.
85 85 Huang, D. et al. (2020). Quantum key distribution over double‐layer quantum satellite networks. IEEE Access 8: 16087–16098. IEEE.
86 86 Pratt, S.R., Raines, R.A., Fossa, C.E., and Temple, M.A. (1999). An operational and performance overview of the IRIDIUM low earth orbit satellite system. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. 2 (2): 2–10, 2nd Quart.
87 87 Bourgoin, J.‐P., Meyer‐Scott, E., Higgins, B.L. et al. (2013). A comprehensive design and performance analysis of low earth orbit satellite quantum communication. New J. Phys. 15 (2): 023006.
88 88 Günthner, K., Khan, I., Elser, D. et al. (2017). Quantum‐limited measurements of optical signals from a geostationary satellite. Optica 4 (6): 611–616.
89 89 Calderaro, L., Agnesi, C., Dequal, D. et al. (2018). Towards quantum communication from global navigation satellite system. Quantum Sci. Technol. 4 (1): 015012.
90 90 F. Yu. ScienceNet.cn, China. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2017/8/384831.shtm?id=384831. http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2017/8/384831. 中国科学家࣋划建“量子星座”—新闻—科学网 (sciencenet.cn)
91 91 Kimble, H.J. (2008). The quantum internet. Nature 453 (7198): 1023–1030.
92 92 Nguyen, H.V. et al. (2017). Towards the quantum internet: generalized quantum network coding for large‐scale quantum communication networks. IEEE Access 5: 17288–17308.
93 93 Sun, Q.‐C. et al. (2016). Quantum teleportation with independent sources and prior entanglement distribution over a network. Nat. Photon. 10 (10): 671–675.
94 94 Yin, J. et al. (2017). Satellite‐based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers. Science 356 (6343): 1140–1144.
95 95 Briegel, H.‐J., Dür, W., Cirac, J.I., and Zoller, P. (1998). Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81: 5932–5935.
96 96 Dür, W., Briegel, H.‐J., Cirac, J.I., and Zoller, P. (1999). Quantum repeaters based on entanglement purification. Phys. Rev. A Gen. Phys. 59: 169–181.
97 97 Żukowski, M., Zeilinger, A., Horne, M.A., and Ekert, A.K. (Dec. 1993). “Event‐readydetectors” bell experiment via entanglement swapping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71: 4287–4290.
98 98 Deutsch, D. et al. (1996). Quantum privacy amplification and the security of quantum cryptography over noisy channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77: 2818–2821.
99 99 Wootters, W.K. and Zurek, W.H. (1982). A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299 (5886): 802–803.
100 100 Dieks, D. (1982). Communication by EPR devices. Phys. Rev. A Gen. Phys. 92 (6): 271–272.
101 101 Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C. et al. (Mar. 1993). Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein‐Podolsky‐Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70: 1895–1899.
102 102 Van Meter, R. (2014). Quantum Networking. Wiley.
103 103 Lloyd, S., Shapiro, J.H., Wong, F.N. et al. (2004). Infrastructure for the quantum internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Commun. Rev. 34 (5): 9–20.
104 104 Castelvecchi, D. (2018). The quantum internet has arrived (and it hasn't). Nature 554 (7692): 289.
105 105 Bennett, C.H. and Brassard, G. (2014). Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. Theor. Comput. Sci. 560 (P1): 7–11.
106 106 Ekert, A.K. (1991). Quantum cryptography based on bell theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (6): 661.
107 107 Broadbent, A. and Schaffner, C. (2016). Quantum cryptography beyond quantum key distribution. Des. Codes Cryptogr. 78 (1): 351–382.
108 108 Wehner, S., Elkouss, D., and Hanson, R. (2018). Quantum internet: a vision for the road ahead. Science 362 (6412): eaam9288.
109 109 Van Meter, R., Ladd, T.D., Munro, W., and Nemoto, K. (2009). System design for a long‐line quantum repeater. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. (TON) 17 (3): 1002–1013.
110 110 Simon, C., De Riedmatten, H., Afzelius, M. et al. (2007). Quantum repeaters with photon pair sources and multimode memories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (19): 190503.
111 111 Sangouard, N., Dubessy, R., and Simon, C. (2009). Quantum repeaters based on single trapped ions. Phys. Rev. A 79 (4): 042340.
112 112 M. A. Nielsen and I. Chuang, “Quantum computation and quantum information,” 2002.
113 113 Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Crepeau, C. et al. (1993). Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein‐Podolsky‐Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (13): 1895.
114 114 Caleffi, M. (2017). Optimal routing for quantum networks. IEEE Access 5: 22 299–22 312.
115 115 Gyongyosi, L. and Imre, S. (2018). Decentralized base‐graph routing for the quantum internet. Phys. Rev. A 98 (2): 022310.
116 116 Van Meter, R., Satoh, T., Ladd, T.D. et al. (2013). Path selection for quantum repeater networks. Netw. Sci. 3 (1–4): 82–95.
117 117 Perseguers, S., Lapeyre, G. Jr., Cavalcanti, D. et al. (2013). Distribution of entanglement in large‐scale quantum networks. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76 (9): 096001.
2 Machine Learning Algorithms
In the first subsection of this chapter, we briefly present a number of machine learning (ML) algorithms in a rather descriptive way. Only in the second subsection will we go into the details of a limited subset of these algorithms. Due to the massive interest in neural networks, this topic is presented in detail separately in Chapters 3–5.
2.1 Fundamentals
2.1.1 Linear Regression
Regression