1.4.3 Analytical Description of OSL
Here, we introduce a basic analytical treatment of OSL, and explanations on practical applications and common materials are described in Chapter 8. The concentration of the metastable state occupied with an electron or hole (NOSL(t)) can be expressed as
(1.59)
where γ1, γ2, … γm mean the stability of the metastable state, that is they govern the probability per unit time in which the system will return to equilibrium, and n(γ1, γ2, …γm, t) is a weighting function, or distribution, expressing the concentration of occupied states possessing the parameters γ1, γ2, … γm, t. Then, OSL intensity IOSL(t) is written as
(1.60)
If we assume that P(t) is the probability per unit time of the decay of the metastable states NOSL(t),
(1.61)
In this formula, l = 1 means a first‐order function. If each state n(γ1, γ2, …γm, t) has its own probability function p(γ1, γ2, … γm) under the condition of l = 1, then
(1.62)
where we assume that no interaction between states occur. This formula has no time dependence of t, and if we would like to treat the probability time dependently, p(γ1, γ2, … γm, t) should be used. The form of p depends on the stimulation methods such as TSL or OSL. For optical stimulation (OSL), we have
(1.63)
where E0, Φ, and σ(E0) are the threshold of optical stimulation energy, optical stimulation intensity, and photoionization cross‐section, respectively. If m = 1, γ1 equals to E0. In previous works [83, 84], photoionization cross‐section is expressed as
(1.64)
where hν is the energy of the incident photon of wavelength λ, m* is the charge carrier effective mass, and m0 is the rest of mass, respectively. There are several expressions of the photoionization cross‐section, and the more simple form [85] is
(1.65)
Photoionization is basically the same as the photoelectric (photoelectric absorption) effect, described in scintillation, but the energy assumed here is around visible photons (several eV).
Generally, stimulation intensity is a function of time, and can be expressed as
(1.66)
where Φ0 and βΦ are a constant of stimulation and a proportional constant of the stimulation intensity if we assume a linear time dependence. If Φ(t) is constant, it represents a continuous wave OSL (CW‐OSL), and the OSL intensity becomes
(1.67)
where t(E0) is 1/p(E0). If Φ(t) is not constant, the situation is a linear modulation OSL (LM‐OSL), and the OSL intensity is
(1.68)
where we assume Φ0 = 0. Generally, we measure OSL in typical PL machines where the environment is free from any other light, and Φ0 = 0 is a valid assumption. In this case, the OSL intensity becomes
(1.69)
Based on these analytical equations, OSL intensity shows exponential decay under stimulation, and this is an important property to distinguish PL and RPL from OSL. If readers would like to study OSL in more detail, it will be better to read specialized books on OSL (for example, [3]).
Sections 1.4.2 and 1.4.3 describe common confirmed formulations of TSL and OSL, but up to now, a widely accepted formulation of RPL has not been obtained. RPL is treated as PL after carrier trapping phenomena, and general treatment of PL can be applied.
1.5 Relationship of Scintillation and Storage Luminescence
Up to now, scintillation (1.3) and ionizing radiation induced storage luminescence (1.4) have been carried out in different fields and by different people. However, these phenomena occur at the same time, and Figure 1.9 describes the situation relating to luminescence by combining Figures 1.3 and 1.8.
Figure 1.9 Typical emission mechanisms of scintillation, OSL, TSL, and RPL.
In addition to the luminescence phenomena described in these figures, some of the secondary electrons lose their energy thermally, and in such a case, we obtain no emissions. In the model of scintillation described in Section 1.3, it sometimes contains thermal energy dissipation as in Equation (1.15), but it does not consider that a significant amount of carrier is stored at trapping centers. In storage luminescence, such as TSL and OSL explained in Section 1.4, analysis is done by the rate equation, which does not consider how many carriers can reach the trapping centers, and scintillation is never assumed. The rate equation is only considered after the trapping (or generally luminescence) sites are occupied, so it cannot be used before the occupation. As commented above, scintillation and storage luminescence occur at the same time after the absorption of ionizing radiation. Therefore, in ionizing radiation induced luminescent materials, branching ratio of scintillation,