Of all documented primary sources, the collections of personal and private letters of the major actors have proved to be most reliable. Especially the handwritten letters. Deciphering Max Müller’s letters to his mother is a terribly difficult job. These are written in German handwriting letters of his time (1823 – 1900). His handwriting is, mildly stated, difficult to read. It is difficult to identify contemporary persons able to read in a German script that is older than the Sütterlin scripts.
Many thanks to Helga Bross. She toiled a lot to learn reading the old Kurrent scripts in Max Müller’s style and then helped the authors to decipher and transcript those many letters. Unforeseeable coincidences? Or is this a way how truths are revealed?
Contents
CHAPTER 2 WHO IS MAX MÜLLER M.A.?
CHAPTER 3 FRIEDRICH MAXIMILIAN’S SCHOOL DAYS AT LEIPZIG
CHAPTER 4 WHICH QUALIFICATIONS DOES
CHAPTER 5 LEARNING SANSKRIT IN GERMANY IN GENERAL AND AT LEIPZIG IN PARTICULAR
CHAPTER 6 WHAT DOES FRIEDRICH MAXIMILIAN
CHAPTER 7 EUROPEANS ENCOUNTERING SANSKRIT
CHAPTER 8 WHY DOES FRIEDRICH MAXIMILIAN GO TO PARIS?
CHAPTER 9 WHAT DOES FRIEDRICH MAXIMILIAN
CHAPTER 10 WHAT DID FRIEDRICH MAXIMILIAN MÜLLER
CHAPTER 11 THE ANCIENT LANGUAGE SANSKRIT HOW DOES IT TRAVEL FROM
CHAPTER 12 WHAT DOES FRIEDRICH MAXIMILIAN MÜLLER DO IN LONDON?
CHAPTER 13 FRIEDRICH MAXIMILIAN MÜLLER
CHAPTER 14 THE EUROPEAN SANSKRIT SCHOLARS
CHAPTER 15 DOES MAX MÜLLER FLEE ALSO FROM LONDON? OR DOES HE SEEK A REFUGE AT OXFORD?
CHAPTER 16 “A CONFESSION” CAME PRIOR TO THE MOMENTS OF TRUTH. MOMENTS OF TRUTH BEGIN TO ARRIVE
CHAPTER 17 MOMENTS OF TRUTH BEGIN TO CONTINUE
CHAPTER 18 MOMENT OF TRUTHS – HOUR OF DECISION
CHAPTER 19 INDOLOGY, LINGUISTICS,
CHAPTER 20 DIRTY MORASS ALL-EMCOMPASSING
INTRODUCTION
This book does not pretend to deal with history. This book deals with our past and with our present by connecting facts that have been disconnected by so-called philosophers, historians, and social scientists in general and by “scholars extraordinary” in particular. It looks back to ancient heritage based on primary documents and evidences.
This book does not intend to describe our past, does not intend to add just another story to the lot, as modern historians do. It simply puts facts coherently together that are based on primary documentary sources. It is a report of a rigorous scrutiny of secondary sources. It puts scholars and their scholarly deliberations to the test of validity collating their biographies and their deliberations with the primary documents.
The authors of this book do not claim to be scholars in the prevailing international academic culture. They have become simple-minded in course of time. They just want to know things and matters as these actually are and how these things and matters came into being. They constantly try to shed off virtual worlds created by superstitions, beliefs, ideologies, systems of artificial terminology and all that goes with these creations. They do exercise in careful reading. And while they read, they raise questions and questions, digging back to the beginning, to the origin.
This methodology is learnt from the wisdom that is practiced in daily life through ages in all human societies. This wisdom is simple. Whenever someone tells a tale, two simple questions are to be put to begin with: who is the narrator and how does the narrator come to know what he is telling about.
The authors begin the presentation of their documentary journey to our past and present putting these two simple questions to a Max Müller, M.A. Why Max Müller, M.A.? All queries to human cultural heritage automatically lead to the “East”, to “Orient” and thus to the cultural heritage of Bharatavarsa, a vast land which has later been named India by foreign people. None else has left behind more printed pages on the “East” and on “India” than Max Müller. He has also claimed to be the first human being performing the remarkable Hercules-job, collecting and editing the oldest book that the humankind has ever known: the complete Rig Veda in the Sanskrit script. Sanskrit is an ancient language.
Another reason to begin this search and re-searches exemplarily with the detailed biography of Max Müller is that he is kept as a demigod in the Gallery of all-time Scholars very high who seemingly excelled in the Science of Ancient Cultures, as one of those European Christian intellectual giants. In any standard books on History and culture we find quotes like:
“The German Indologist H. Jacobi came independently to similar conclusions and dated the beginning of the Vedic period in the middle of the 5th millennium. Mostly one followed, however, the dating set by the famous German Indologist Max Mueller who taught in Cambridge in the late 19th century. Setting out from the lifetime of the Buddha around 500 BC he dated the origin of the Upanishads in the centuries from 800 to 600 BC as the philosophy in them had originated before Buddha’s deeds. The Brahmana– and Mantra texts preceded these in the centuries from 1000 to 800 respectively from 1200 to 1000 BC. Today one dates the oldest Vedic text, that of Rigveda, into the middle of the 2nd millennium BC. Since the Vedas soon