8 8. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Dental implants. 2011. aaoms.org/dental_implants.php. Accessed March 31, 2011.
9 9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Oral health resources. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/oralhealth/basics/adult-oral-health/adult_older.htm
10 10. Vallecillo Capilla M, Romero Olid Mde N, Olmedo Gaya MV, Reyes Botella C, Zorrilla Romera C Cylindrical dental implants with hydroxyapatite‐and titanium plasma spray‐coated surfaces: 5‐year results. J Oral Implantol. 2007; 33(2): 59–68.
11 11. Apratim A, Eachempati P, Krishnappa SKK, Singh V, Chhabra S, et al. Zirconia in dental implantology: a review. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent. 2015; 5(3): 147–156.
12 12. Gahlert G, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18(5): 660–668.
13 13. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoqlu E Zirconia dental implants; a literature review. J Oral Implantol. 2011; 37(3): 367–376.
14 14. Hoste S, Vercruyssen M, Quirynen M, Willems G Risk factors and indications of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a literature review. Aust Orthod J. 2008; 24: 140–148.
15 15. Hein C Translating evidence of oral‐systemic relationships into models of interprofessional collaboration. J Dent Hyg. 2009; 83(4): 188–189.
16 16. Hein C Scottsdale revisited: the role of dental practitioners in screening for undiagnosed diabetes and the medical co‐management of patients with diabetes or those at risk for diabetes. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2008; 29(9): 538–540, 542–544, 546–553.
17 17. Iacopino AM What is the role of inflammation in the relationship between periodontal disease and general health? J Can Dent Assoc. 2008; 74(8): 695.
18 18. Iacopino AM Practicing oral‐systemic medicine: the need for interprofessional education. J Can Dent Assoc. 2008; 74(10): 866–867.
19 19. Iacopino AM Periodontitis and diabetes interrelationships: role of inflammation. Ann Periodontol. 2001; 6(1): 125–137.
20 20. Ring ME. Dentistry: An Illustrated History, 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
21 21. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL Guidelines for the identification of the mandibular vital structures: practical clinical applications of anatomy and radiological examination methods. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2010; 1(2): e1.
22 22. Zwemer TJ. Mosby’s Dental Dictionary, 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2008.
23 23. Taylor TD, Laney WR. Dental Implants: Are They for Me? 2nd ed. Carol Streams, IL: Quintessence, 1993.
2 Implant Therapy: Oral‐Systemic Health, Medical History, and Risk Assessment
Oral‐systemic health link to overall health Cardiovascular/cerebrovascular (CV/CV) disease Preterm birth/low birth weight Diabetes Respiratory disease Medical history/risk assessment Bisphosphonates, BRONJ/BON, ARONJ, MRONJ Xerostomia
Medical history/risk assessment forms
The terms oral health and general health should not be interpreted as separate entities. Oral health is integral to general health; this report provides important reminders that oral health means more than healthy teeth and that you cannot be healthy without oral health.
—Surgeon General Report, 2001
Over the past 30 years, implantology and periodontal medicine (periodontal and peri‐implant disease) have changed the way we think about dentistry. Dental professionals have moved away from the examination for decayed or broken teeth to a comprehensive examination of the entire mouth and overall health of the patient. The traditional dentistry resolution for missing teeth was to fabricate a bridge, partial or full removable denture or do nothing. After 15 years of wearing a full denture, patients can suffer from gastrointestinal disorders from reduced ability to chew their food and this may lead to a shorter life expectancy (1). Partial denture wearers often experience the domino effect, losing the teeth that support the partial at a rate of 44% within 10 years (2). There are even romantic consequences for edentulous patients, as they can be reluctant to start new relationships. Some edentulous patients are categorized as oral invalids unable to wear their dentures without pain (3). Today, the optimal restorative options for replacing missing teeth are implants.
It is an exciting time to be in dentistry, with the increasing use of regeneration tissue/bone procedures, and implant dentistry. Implants rank second only to bleaching procedures as the most sought after treatment in dentistry. Hygienists play an important role, recommending, assessing, maintaining, and monitoring implants. Hygienists have 50–60 minutes with patients on a regular recare basis and hold the key to many of the relationships of our patients to the practice. Often, hygienists are asked; “What should I do to replace this tooth?” and “What are my options?”
Hygienists should learn all they can about regeneration and implant therapy. What these procedures can do to benefit the lives of the patient for aesthetics and overall health. Keep in mind that many implant candidates are dental failures, periodontal disease patients, or patients with poor oral health habits. Hygienists can educate patients on implant options that can improve their oral health and might change the patient’s life!
The best candidates for implants are your existing patients of record . You have patients with missing teeth, partials, dentures, and bridges that are failing. You already have a relationship and trust with these patients. If your office wants to do more implant dentistry a key source of prospective implant candidates are referrals from your existing satisfied implant patients. Do not be afraid to ask for referrals from your satisfied patients to encourage more like‐minded patients to learn about their options for implant dentistry.
Patient selection for implants is based on a number of factors including oral‐systemic health, medical history, risk assessment, and hygiene status. Patients who are immunosuppressed or taking anticoagulants, steroids, or IV bisphosphonates can be contraindicated for implant therapy or need to be evaluated on risk levels. Heavy smokers, poorly controlled diabetics, patients with previous poor bone‐healing history, and patients with multiple systemic health problems should also be evaluated carefully. Any diseases that can directly affect the ability of osteoblasts to lay bone or interfere with wound healing of bony tissue are contraindicated for placement of implants or the dentist needs to evaluate the options with the patient’s physician.
Uncontrolled diabetics and heavy smokers are at the top of the list of contraindicated patients due to the poor vascularization of the gingival tissues as well as higher risk for infection and slower healing time. However, a controlled