1.1.1 Context of SMART
The term “smart” is the most commonly added word to every application, service, and technology in recent times. The context of “smart” varies based on the definition of the manufacturer, user, and the objectives for which the application, services, and technology are developed. Any product that implies making life simpler and better than its previous counterpart is termed as “smart”. Hence, defining the context of “smart” is utterly dependent on added functionalities in a product. The functionalities may include intelligence in operation, internet connectivity in devices such as IoT, data-driven operation and analysis, learning capabilities from the deployed environment, communication between devices or entities of a system, or a combination of any or all the mentioned functionalities.
The term “smart” originates from an acronym: Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology. “Smart” technologies can be broadly categorized in the following ways:
1 a. Smart automation devices are devices automated by programming and learning data to operate based on an intuitive interface included in the smart automation device. A geyser that operates at a particular interval of time to heat water automatically considering the environment’s ambient temperature is an example of a smart automation device.
2 b. Smart software devices are application based and programmed to perform analytics, display data to the user, request data from the connected subsystems in a system, or any other functionalities for which it is programmed. Such devices mostly require internet connectivity or any communication link between the connected subsystems. An example of a smart software device is an application installed in a computing system to control and monitor a factory’s operation. Smart software devices are considered to be easily scalable and upgradeable.
3 c. Smart hardware devices, as the name suggests, include remotely connected, monitored, and operated devices. Such devices mostly require a software-based user interface and connectivity using any communication technology to monitor and operate. Smart appliances at homes, such as smart bulbs, are one of the examples of a smart hardware device.
4 d. Smart computational environment: Computational environment in recent days has upgraded diversely but converges to a common theme of “smart”. The environment here refers to all the connected devices or smart devices in a system that give a platform to the user to develop and execute an operation for which the environment is proficient. The operation’s development and execution is made possible by establishing necessary communication between each internal device and required external entities. The IBM Cloud, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud are examples of a smart computational environment. Users have access to a variety of applications and devices that can be configured as required.
The categorization of “smart” devices is broad and not limited to the types mentioned earlier. Enhancement in existing technologies and new developments have shown vast possibilities of making existing devices smart and accessible. The addition of smart functionalities in any system should increase product capabilities, utilization, reliability, and transcend conventional product boundaries.
The context of smart charging is an amalgamation of all the “smart” technologies. The smart charging infrastructure involves the need of automation devices, software run devices, and supporting software, hardware devices, and the computational environment. Each of the mentioned entities is built with intelligence added by various algorithms that help make relevant decisions and implement them.
Any “smart” system requires proper coordination while developing and operating. The next subsection briefly explains approaches taken by the developers to ensure the addition of functionalities, which make the system smart and reliable to the users and renders market value to the developers.
1.1.2 Approaches
The paradigm of “smart” is relatively novel and rupturing the conventional product developing organization. The conceptualization of connotation demands a systematic approach. The approaches vary based on the utility and target users. A developer takes three different approaches, considering the target, to determine which functionalities are to be added. The first approach is to add smartness to the target applications accessible to users of the device. Adding functionalities to an application so that the users can monitor, control, and execute the workings of a connected system smartly is an example of the first approach.
The second approach adds functionalities to the device instead of the application that connects the user and the device. An example of the second approach is adding sensors and programmed microcontrollers to a device to operate intelligently based on the sensor data and computed parameters. The user interface connected in the second approach can be limited to data visualizations and minimal control operations. The third approach is an amalgamation of both the first and second approaches. Both the target user application and the devices connected are upgraded to develop a smart environment.
The developers of smart charging take the third approach. The third approach ensures that the overall system is intelligent to make decisions even when it is not able to coordinate with the connected devices or software. For example, while in operation, the cable connecting the distribution transformer and the charging station of a smart charging system experience a higher current than the normal value. As per the first approach, the information of fault will be conveyed to the operator of the monitoring station and the fault will continue until the operator signals to shut down the operation. There is a possibility that the cables will be damaged by the time operator responds, the operator did not respond due to negligence, or there was a communication breakdown leading to non-receipt of information at the operator end. If the second approach is taken, although the system will shut down due to fault, the operator will have no information to detect the cause of the fault. However, if the third approach is taken, the operator will get information about the fault and the system will shut down operation on its own. The third approach ensures the safety of the system and saves time working on fault correction.
1.1.3 Contributions
This chapter has described the types of charging followed by the categorization of smart charging, the requirements and components of the smart charging system, the enablers who coherently support the development, operation, and management of the smart charging system, and control architectures developed so far for implementation and integration with the conventional grid. They commenced an outlook on commerce, evolution, and competitiveness in the smart charging system market.
This section is structured to give readers an understanding of the term “smart” and its applicability in an EV charging infrastructure. The first section defines “smart” and explains the context and approaches to adding smartness. The second section deals with different types of charging: viz., uncoordinated, coordinated, and smart. The third and fourth sections describe the impact and requirements of the smart-charging system, respectively. The fifth section defines each smart-charging system’s components, followed by a discussion on various control architectures that can be used for smart charging in the sixth section. The commerce and outlook of smart-charging are explored in the seventh section, followed by a conclusion in the eighth section.
1.2 Types of Charging
The charging of EVs needs power from a source. The power source can be the conventional utility grid, local energy storage system, renewable energy systems, or a hybrid system developed by combining