14 14 Buckley, C.E., Kavanagh, D.O., Traynor, O. et al. (2014). Is the skillset obtained in surgical simulation transferable to the operating theatre? Am. J. Surg. 207: 146–157.
15 15 Balsa, I.M., Giuffrida, M.A., Culp, W.T.N., and Mayhew, P.D. (2020). Perceptions and experience of veterinary surgery residents with minimally invasive surgery simulation training. Vet. Surg. 49: O21–O27.
16 16 Chen, C.Y., Elarbi, M., Ragle, C.A. et al. (2019). Development and evaluation of a high‐fidelity canine laparoscopic ovariectomy model for surgical simulation training and testing. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 254: 113–123.
17 17 Li, M.M. and George, J. (2017). A systematic review of low‐cost laparoscopic simulators. Surg. Endosc. 31: 38–48.
18 18 Sellers, T., Ghannam, M., Asantey, K. et al. (2019). Low‐cost laparoscopic skill training for medical students using homemade equipment. MedEdPORTAL 15: 10810.
19 19 Vassiliou, M.C., Ghitulescu, G.A., Feldman, L.S. et al. (2006). The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery: evidence for reliability. Surg. Endosc. 20: 744–747.
20 20 Dauster, B., Steinberg, A.P., Vassiliou, M.C. et al. (2005). Validity of the MISTELS simulator for laparoscopy training in urology. J. Endourol. 19: 541–545.
21 21 Fraser, S.A., Klassen, D.R., Feldman, L.S. et al. (2003). Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg. Endosc. 17: 964–967.
22 22 Fransson, B.A. (2017). VALS program. https://valsprogram.org/ (accessed 06 October 2020).
23 23 Fransson, B.A. and Ragle, C.A. (2010). Assessment of laparoscopic skills before and after simulation training with a canine abdominal model. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 236: 1079–1084.
24 24 Scott, D.J., Ritter, E.M., Tesfay, S.T. et al. (2008). Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency‐based training. Surg. Endosc. 22: 1887–1893.
25 25 Nagendran, M., Gurusamy, K.S., Aggarwal, R. et al. (2013). Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 8: CD006575.
26 26 Guedes, H.G., Camara Costa Ferreira, Z.M., Ribeiro de Sousa Leao, L. et al. (2019). Virtual reality simulator versus box‐trainer to teach minimally invasive procedures: a meta‐analysis. Int. J. Surg. 61: 60–68.
27 27 Willaert, W., Van De Putte, D., Van Renterghem, K. et al. (2013). Training models in laparoscopy: a systematic review comparing their effectiveness in learning surgical skills. Acta Chir. Belg. 113: 77–95.
28 28 Jensen, K., Ringsted, C., Hansen, H.J. et al. (2014). Simulation‐based training for thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial: virtual‐reality versus black‐box simulation. Surg. Endosc. 28: 1821–1829.
29 29 Fransson, B.A., Chen, C.Y., Noyes, J.A. et al. (2016). Instrument motion metrics for laparoscopic skills assessment in virtual reality and augmented reality. Vet. Surg. 45: O5–O13.
30 30 Panait, L., Akkary, E., Bell, R.L. et al. (2009). The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. J. Surg. Res. 156: 312–316.
31 31 Botden, S.M. and Jakimowicz, J.J. (2009). What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? Surg. Endosc. 23: 1693–1700.
32 32 Neary, P.C., Boyle, E., Delaney, C.P. et al. (2008). Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual‐reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons. Surg. Endosc. 22: 2301–2309.
33 33 Van Sickle, K.R., McClusky, D.A. 3rd, Gallagher, A.G. et al. (2005). Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task. Surg. Endosc. 19: 1227–1231.
34 34 Botden, S.M., Buzink, S.N., Schijven, M.P. et al. (2007). Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. World J. Surg. 31: 764–772.
35 35 Moglia, A., Ferrari, V., Morelli, L. et al. (2016). A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot‐assisted surgery. Eur. Urol. 69: 1065–1080.
36 36 Carpenter, B.T. and Sundaram, C.P. (2017). Training the next generation of surgeons in robotic surgery. Robot Surg. 4: 39–44.
37 37 Fransson, B.A.M.K., Mickas, M., and Karn, K. (2019). Suture Ligated Ovariectomy by Novice Laparoscopic Surgeons Pre‐Trained in VALS Curriculum. Veterinary Endoscopy Society Scientific Symposium.
38 38 Gallagher, A.G., Ritter, E.M., and Satava, R.M. (2003). Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surg. Endosc. 17: 1525–1529.
39 39 Sweet, R.M., Hananel, D., and Lawrenz, F. (2010). A unified approach to validation, reliability, and education study design for surgical technical skills training. Arch. Surg. 145: 197–201.
40 40 Ericsson, K.A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad. Med. 79: S70–S81.
41 41 Stefanidis, D. and Heniford, B.T. (2009). The formula for a successful laparoscopic skills curriculum. Arch. Surg. 144: 77–82; discussion 82.
42 42 Gonzalez, R., Bowers, S.P., Smith, C.D. et al. (2004). Does setting specific goals and providing feedback during training result in better acquisition of laparoscopic skills? Am. Surg. 70: 35–39.
43 43 Chang, L., Petros, J., Hess, D.T. et al. (2007). Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program: is voluntary participation effective? Surg. Endosc. 21: 418–421.
44 44 Porte, M.C., Xeroulis, G., Reznick, R.K. et al. (2007). Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self‐accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. Am. J. Surg. 193: 105–110.
45 45 Palter, V.N. and Grantcharov, T.P. (2014). Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 259: 443–448.
46 46 Spruit, E.N., Band, G.P., and Hamming, J.F. (2015). Increasing efficiency of surgical training: effects of spacing practice on skill acquisition and retention in laparoscopy training. Surg. Endosc. 29: 2235–2243.
47 47 Swanström, L.L. and Soper, N.J. (2014). Mastery of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery, 4e. Philadephia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
48 48 Cassera, M.A., Zheng, B., and Swanstrom, L.L. (2012). Data‐based self‐study guidelines for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery examination. Surg. Endosc. 26: 3426–3429.
49 49 Adams, B.J., Margaron, F., and Kaplan, B.J. (2012). Comparing video games and laparoscopic simulators in the development of laparoscopic skills in surgical residents. J. Surg. Educ. 69: 714–717.
50 50 Ou, Y., McGlone, E.R., Camm, C.F. et al. (2013). Does playing video games improve laparoscopic skills? Int. J. Surg. 11: 365–369.
51 51 Glassman, D., Yiasemidou, M., Ishii, H. et al. (2016). Effect of playing video games on laparoscopic skills performance: a systematic review. J. Endourol. 30: 146–152.
52 52 Millard, H.A., Millard, R.P., Constable, P.D. et al. (2014). Relationships among video gaming proficiency and spatial orientation, laparoscopic, and traditional surgical skills of third‐year veterinary students. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 244: 357–362.
53 53 Levi, O., Shettko, D.L., Battles, M. et al. (2019). Effect of short‐ versus long‐term video game playing on basic laparoscopic skills acquisition of veterinary medicine students. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 46: 184–194.
54 54 Kilkenny, J., Santarossa, A., Mrotz, V. et al. (2017). Investigating laparoscopic