Mutual Aid. Pablo Servigne. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Pablo Servigne
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Биология
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781509547937
Скачать книгу
ability to use these molecules formed by photosynthesis as a source of energy. These two processes are the result of associations and fusions between bacteria.39

      During our research, we were surprised by the avalanche of very recent studies. It must be said that the dizzying acceleration of DNA sequencing finally allows all the bacteria present in any environment to be detected, where previously only those that were happy to grow on the culture media in labs were noted. The results are irrefutable: the propensity of bacteria to collaborate seems endless.41

       All the colours of ‘symbiodiversity’

      For 3.8 billion years, living creatures have developed a thousand and one ways to associate, to cooperate, to be together or to completely merge. These relations between identical, similar or totally different beings can take many forms: compulsory or optional, temporary or permanent, asymmetric or symmetrical, embedded or in parallel, timid or fusional, conscious or unconscious, momentary or lasting, new or ancestral, surprising or routine.

      From mutualisms (diffuse associations between species) to symbioses (compulsory associations), from occasional collective action to fusional coevolution, favours are done and returned in all directions: protection in exchange for food, transport for protection, food for care, information or removal of parasites, and so on. We discover with wonder what is called symbiodiversity.

      For now, we will note from this quick overview of non-human beings that (1) mutual aid exists, (2) it is ubiquitous and (3) it potentially involves all living creatures, including humans.

       We are an inextricable bundle of interdependencies

      So we are the product of an interlocking set of associations that have been around since the advent of life, and which still take place today, with societies of a unique size and complexity, making us one of the most cooperative species in the living world. In short, we are mutual aid incarnate. This leads, as in certain social insects, to what ecologists call an indisputable ecological ‘success’:43 we have colonized the whole earth (which does not necessarily guarantee a long stay on this planet).

       Setting the record straight

      Not all interactions between living creatures are beneficial. Like humans involved in corporations, governments and property management, the species of the six kingdoms sometimes scam, ignore, avoid, attack and manipulate each other – not to mention the fact that these relationships may change in the course of a day, a season, a life or a geological era. Tensions ease, friendships fester, pacts are loosened, friends betrayed. Some links are very stable while others are very volatile.

      How are we to classify all these interactions between species? One simple way to do this (one which doesn’t account for complexity, but allows us to put our ideas into order) is to draw up a small table with two columns (species A and species B), and consider the benefits (+) and the costs (−) of the interactions between the two.44

      On the first line there are the mutually beneficial relations between two species (+/+ relations), those that we have just been discussing. They are called mutualisms in general, and symbioses in the particular case where these two species cannot live without each other.

      When species tend to politely avoid each other, we speak of coexistence (0/0 relations). This is the case in the Amazon rainforest, for example, among arboreal ants, whose hunting territory is an entire tree (and woe betide any other insects that land on it!). In the evening, the diurnal species returns to its nest and leaves room for the nocturnal species until the early hours of the morning. Our intuition as biologists is nevertheless that the box ‘coexistence’ in our table is a grabbag in which we temporarily store the interactions whose advantages and disadvantages are as yet unclear to ecologists.

Species B Relationship
+ + Mutualism/symbiosis
0 0 Coexistence
+ 0 Commensalism
0 Amensalism
+ Predation/parasitism
Competition

      Because there may indeed be disadvantages. This is the case with (more or less) asymmetric relationships. For example, between the fungus Penicillium, which naturally produces an antibiotic, and certain closely related bacteria, the relationship will be neutral for the former, but frankly negative for the latter. We then speak of amensalism (0/– relations). On the contrary, a small epiphytic orchid that lives perched on the branch of a giant of the rainforest will find great benefit in being 20 metres up in the air, but will not offer any advantage to the tree. We then speak of commensalism (relations +/0).

      As for frankly asymmetric relations, these are the best known: they are called predation and parasitism