83 US Census (2019). United States Census Bureau – American FactFinder. https://factfinder.census.gov (accessed 17 December 2019).
84 Vu, T.T., Matsuoka, M., and Yamazaki, F. (2004). LIDAR‐based change detection of buildings in dense urban areas. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 3413–3416. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2004.1370438.
85 Wentz, E.A., York, A.M., Alberti, M., Conrow, L., Fischer, H., Inostroza, L., Jantz, C., Pickett, S.T.A., Seto, K.C., and Taubenbock, H. (2018). Six fundamental aspects for conceptualizing multidimensional urban form: a spatial mapping perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 179: 55–62. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.07.007.
86 Wu, Q., Chen, R., Sun, H., and Cao, Y. (2011). Urban building density detection using high resolution SAR imagery. 2011 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (Munich), 45–48. doi:10.1109/JURSE.2011.5764715.
87 Yu, B., Liu, H., Wu, J., and Lin, W.M. (2009). Investigating impacts of urban morphology on spatio‐temporal variations of solar radiation with airborne LIDAR data and a solar flux model: a case study of downtown Houston. International Journal of Remote Sensing 30(17): 4359–4385. doi:10.1080/01431160802555846.
88 Zha, Y., Gao, J., and Ni, S. (2003). Use of normalized difference built‐up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24(3): 583–594. doi:10.1080/01431160304987.
89 Zhang, Q., and Seto, K.C. (2013). Can night‐time light data identify typologies of urbanization? A global assessment of successes and failures. Remote Sensing 5(7): 3476–3494. doi:10.3390/rs5073476.
90 Zhao, Y., Ovando‐Montejo, G.A, Frazier, A.E., Mathews, A.J., Flynn, K.C., and Ellis, E.A. (2017). Estimating home and work population using lidar‐derived building volumes. International Journal of Remote Sensing 38(4): 1180–1196. doi:10.1080/01431161.2017.1280634.
CHAPTER 3 Opportunities and Challenges of Unmanned Aircraft Systems for Urban Applications
Feilin Lai1, Austin Bush2, Xiaojun Yang1, and David Merrick2
1 Department of Geography, College of Social Sciences and Public Policy, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
2 Emergency Management & Homeland Security Program, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Abstract
Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) are an emerging technology with extensive applications in various domains and industries. This technology lends itself greatly to the need in generating high‐quality geospatial data with a high temporal resolution, while also maintaining a high degree of safety. With flexible operations, low implementation costs, and high‐quality data outputs, UAS are ideal tools for urban applications that require rapid mapping, assessment, or management. However, increasingly these applications are facing regulatory challenges from local, state, and national governing bodies. This chapter discusses the opportunities and challenges of UAS for urban remote sensing research. It begins with an introduction to the concept of UAS and some common types of UAS models and cameras onboard, followed by a discussion of a typical UAS data collection procedure including mission planning, flight operations, and data processing. Several urban applications using UAS are discussed, including disaster relief efforts, building inspection, disorder detection, and smart cities construction, along with a case study to demonstrate how UAS can be used for 3D mapping of urban structures. Finally, the major challenges of using UAS for urban studies are discussed, which are related to regulations, operations, and data processing. Recognizing a new frontier of remote sensing applications emerging with UAS platforms, this chapter helps better understand the potential of UAS in urban applications and points out potential future research directions.
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Cities make up 55% of the population in this world, and this number keeps increasing with the continued global trend of urbanization (UN DESA, 2018). Drastic urban growth can be accompanied by various issues such as air pollution, climate change, natural resource depletion, degraded ecosystems, among others. Therefore, effective management of urban areas is critical to human’s collective success. Remote sensing plays an important role in sustainable planning and resource management in urban areas (Seto et al., 2012). Generally, three types of remotely sensed data are commonly used in urban applications and are collected at specific scales to meet different needs: satellite imagery, aerial imagery, and terrestrial data. Among the possible platforms used for aerial imagery, unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have rapidly become a popular data acquisition technology for a variety of industries and applications over the last decade. While many UAS applications were directed to the fields of forestry and agriculture, there is a lack of comprehensive reviews on the exploration of using UAS in urban areas (Noor et al., 2018). Since UAS is well suited for some urban applications with flexible, low‐cost deployment, high spatial resolutions, and dynamic sensor combinations, this chapter aims to provide an overview of the concept of UAS and to discuss its potentials and limitations in urban applications.
In general, a UAS is a system comprising an unmanned aircraft (UA), a ground control system (GCS), and a communication data link between the UA and the GCS. Another common term unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) only refers to the UA component of UAS (Colomina et al., 2008). Due to the low‐cost associated with UA compared to manned aircraft, UAS applications have been gradually extending into other fields, such as precision farming (Zhang and Kovacs, 2012; Sonka and Ifamr, 2014; Tsouros et al., 2019), forestry (Howell et al., 2018; Jayathunga et al., 2018), ecology (Anderson and Gaston, 2013; Hodgson and Koh, 2016), and disaster management (Restas, 2015; Bravo et al., 2019). UAS can overcome many challenges faced by traditional land survey methods, including performing under hazardous environments and reaching areas that are impossible for manned aircraft to enter. In circumstances where traditional manned aircraft cannot operate, such as low altitudes, areas with physical obstacles, and poor weather conditions, UA provide a much safer and lower‐cost alternative to collecting remote data. Compared to satellite imagery, images captured with UAS can be generally free of clouds and have a very high spatial resolution due to the closer proximity to the ground surface. Most importantly, UAS platform and sensor combinations allow the generation of coherent spectral information (i.e. ortho‐mosaic imagery) and terrain information (Digital Surface Models, DSMs), which are valuable topographic‐related analyses. Given these appealing characteristics, there is currently a surge in remote sensing research investigating the potential of UAS technology in a myriad of scenarios. In recent years, there has been a notable increase in the number of remote sensing projects conducted in rural environments, but much less in urban areas (Singh and Frazier, 2018). Most of these studies were focused on geographic areas with minimal human activities due to regulatory challenges and operational risks, such as maintaining safe conditions while flying in the vicinity of people. Rural locations for UAS flights tend to have fewer physical obstacles, greater visibility, and less nonparticipating individuals in the vicinity, thus resulting in significantly lower risk. Due to these reasons, there is currently a pressing need to explore the full potential of UAS for remote sensing in urban settings.
Due to the heterogeneity and complexity of urban landscapes, deriving urban settlements and land cover information from remote sensor imagery can be challenging (Jensen and Cowen, 1999; Kit et al., 2012). UAS is a convenient data collection platform