According to that, reality cannot be objective?
Reality is the most objective dimension of thought we are able to construct after our image. The growing person that observes the world through his not yet developed and educated senses quickly learns to assimilate the collective images of his ancestors in a way that he can draw from them the optimal number of advantages for his life.
If I understand you correctly the general doings of humanity are reduced to simply administrating their only reality imparted through education?
They are not only administrating it, they are also developing it, at least as far as the conditions of their feigned structures allow them to do so. Although the normal human being has very little possibilities to influence these collective mechanisms individually, because those collective streams are accompanied with such an intensive collective force that the pressure of its flood always pushes away everything that holds against it.
But what drives us? What is trying to reach itself within us, so our fate can fulfil itself?
At first sight it is our superstitious ambitions that urge us – but behind that there is a silent force that is always desirous to balance the inner disharmony that indwells us. It originates in our social models and familial structures that coined us in our childhood. We are not free at heart – all the aims we pursue in the outside world are a never-ending attempt to compensate the inner deficit through a specific action in the material world. But we have the chance to grow if we bravely move forward and realise the greater connections, shoulder responsibility, and know that the things we do are not always good, but the best possible seen from the individual point of view.
What about our social ambitions? Are they wrong?
They are only wrong when we believe that they are right. Our social values mirror the game humanity plays and the fact that it invents certain rules in order to have something that they can occupy themselves with while living. Common morals are nothing but a collective self-occupation-therapy, so that human beings can perform their anarchistic nature on a controlled stage.
Why then all this stress, all this war and anxiety in the world?
Because our view is so narrow and dual. No one goes to war just fore the sake of war, no, we fight against each other, because the other one is always wrong and one is anxious to persuade the other one of the own justified demands. If it is necessary to enforce ones postulations, one has to use war, which of course never results from the own injustice, but from the unapologetic attitude of the other. The universal frequency is an impersonal force, neither good nor bad. Only the mechanisms of our consciousness paint them „black“ or „white“. The differentiation happens consequently in our central nervous system, in our thoughts. The former, negative descriptions of destructive forces mirror nothing else but the own, subconscious demons of mankind. The world is a mirror, in whose reflection we see the image of the others overlapped by our own demons, for which we are blind to recognize them ourselves.
Blind? But evil exists in this world – does it not?
Yes, but only because we do not know the deeper coherences of evil. Evil is mostly being constructed by numerous negative experiences, which in turn feed on personal disappointments. These disappointments result from negative experiences, from which we perceive only the mistakes of the others – not our own expectations.
Do you mean we can only see errors within the others?
Generally we do, yes.
That doesn’t sound very comforting! Where could be the solution?
We may not expect any solution to come from the outside, but we have to find it within ourselves. It is always most important to create ones own point of reference regardless of ones position, which is giving us the possibility to watch our actions from the outside point. Then we will realize very soon that a solution is not necessarily needed.
Why don’t we need a solution?
Because we are always a part of the solution! The problem is only the shadow of the resulting realization: We always see from our own perspective, the point from which we create our problems ourselves, because seen through the eyes of eternity our problems do not even exist ...
... and where does the problem exist then?
Nowhere. Every mistake is nothing but the retrospective of a realization, and the sense of all this lies within the strength not to root oneself to the position of the mistake. In other words: Mistakes are only the nebulosity of material systems, that wouldn’t exist without points of reference. Seen from a spiritual point of view they are nothing but a direction sign to realizations, helping us to perceive the operating forces of evolution, that normally are not perceptible through material thinking.
You think that injustice will remain in this world as long as we are only able to see it in others and never within ourselves?
Yes. Only the one who knows his own shadow, knows who he really is. And only the one who knows himself can conceive what it means to evolve from within oneself. For we do not only walk the tight-rope over the abyss, we are also the crocodiles lingering in the bleary waters who eat the ones who lost their balance. At least until we recognize the fact that the sinners are one part of ourselves and the crocodiles resemble the other part of the same existence.
But what about world piece?
The quest for paradise must remain an unfulfilled longing otherwise the human race has no ambition for development.
What ...? Why can’t the human race develop in piece and harmony?
A static paradise doesn’t offer enough foundations for the human ego to evolve, and therefore peace is never possible. Humanity needs war with the prospect of piece or perpetual crisis that includes the hope for paradise, which of course may not fulfil itself, so that it can serve as fundamental motivation for development.
Well I don’t know ... this sounds really brutal. Somehow I miss the term “Freedom”? What about our own, free will?
We have the freedom to do exactly that what vibrates within the collective frequency of the actual collective energy field of time, in a manner of speaking to implement a socially imprinted image of freedom within contracted, personal possibilities. It is always about “doing what has to be done”, like even Goethe knew already before our time. If we fulfil this aspiration, we perceive what leads to a conceived image of freedom.
Where does the final destination beyond our social and material aims lie?
Our origins lie within the spirit of the universe, within the unknown, and we came here to evolve – to learn about the laws of change within matter – This is about learning in what way we influence our world – To create the conditions under which we can change our reality, so we can understand the way our intellect is working. Only then can we realize that we are the ones who have to change if we want to improve the world.
b) Specific questions referring to higher realizations and human models
What do you think about the Christian image of God?
As long as we are not searching for this God deep within ourselves or in our memories but inside religious scripts, we should restrict our approach to the historical perspective of an anthropologist. Every human being hides the memory of the source of creation within his consciousness, the spiritual flame into