Опыт реформирования оборонной промышленности США после «холодной войны». Михаил Александров

полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

      Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

      Примечания

      1

      Transcript of President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Farewell Address (1961). URL: https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php? flash=false&doc=90&page=transcript

      2

      См.: Кузык Б.Н. Военно-промышленный комплекс в экономике и политике России. М.: Институт экономических стратегий, 2004. С. 150–164; Пустякова Н.Г. Реструктуризация и конверсия оборонной промышленности. Проблемы и перспективы // Экономический журнал ВШЭ. 1999. № 4. С. 570–573.

      3

      Бендиков М.А., Хрусталев Е.Ю. Эволюция концепции и механизма управления конверсией в условиях переходной российской экономики // Экономическая наука современной России. 1998. № 3. С. 110.

      4

      URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51746

      5

      URL: http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/64891

      6

      United States General Accounting Office. Defense Sector. Trends in Employment and Spending. Briefing Report to the Chairman, Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives. GAO/NSIAD-95-105BR, Washington, April 1995. P. 1.

      7

      After the Cold War: Living With Lower Defense Spending. Congress of the United States. Office of Technology Assessment. OTA-ITE-524, NTIS order #PB92—152537, February 1992. P. 4.

      8

      URL: https://www.thebalance.com/national-debt-by-year-compared-to-gdp-and-major-events-3306287

      9

      United States General Accounting Office. Defense Sector. Trends in Employment and Spending. Briefing Report to the Chairman, Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives. GAO/NSIAD-95-105BR, Washington, April 1995. P. 10.

      10

      United States General Accounting Office. Defense Sector. Trends in Employment and Spending. Briefing Report to the Chairman, Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives. GAO/NSIAD-95-105BR, Washington, April 1995. P. 1.

      11

      Ibid. P. 13.

      12

      United States General Accounting Office. Defense Sector. Trends in Employment and Spending. Briefing Report to the Chairman, Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives. GAO/NSIAD-95-105BR, Washington, April 1995. P. 11.

      13

      United States General Accounting Office. Defense Sector. Trends in Employment and Spending. Briefing Report to the Chairman, Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives. GAO/NSIAD-95-105BR, Washington, April 1995. P. 1—2

      14

      Ibid. P. 26–27.

      15

      After the Cold War: Living With Lower Defense Spending. Congress of the United States. Office of Technology Assessment. OTA-ITE-524, NTIS order #PB92-152537, February 1992. P. 193.

      16

      Ibid. P. 10.

      17

      Ibid. P. 193.

      18

      United States General Accounting Office. Defense Industry. Trends in DOD Spending, Industrial Productivity, and Competition. Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO/PEMD-97-3. Washington, January 1997. – P. 11.

      19

      United States General Accounting Office. Defense Industry. Trends in DOD Spending, Industrial Productivity, and Competition. Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO/PEMD-97-3. Washington, January 1997. P. 13.

      20

      Gholz Eugene, Sapolsky Harvey M. Restructuring the U.S. Defense Industry. International Security, January 2000. P. 45–46.

      21

      Ibid. P. 5.

      22

      Weidenbaum, Murray L. The Future of the U.S. Defense Industry. Occasional Paper 90, doi:10.7936/K75D8Q13. Washington University in St. Louis, 1991. P. 1

      23

      After the Cold War: Living With Lower Defense Spending. Congress of the United States. Office of Technology Assessment. OTA-ITE-524, NTIS order #PB92—152537, February 1992. P. 193.

      24

      Department of Defense. Adjusting to the Drawdown. Report of the Defense Conversion Commission. December 31, 1992. Washington, DC.P. 1.

      25

      Ibid. P. 7–8.

      26

      Weidenbaum, Murray L. The Future of the U.S. Defense Industry. Occasional Paper 90, doi:10.7936/K75D8Q13. Washington University in St. Louis, 1991. P. 5–6.

      27

      National Military Strategy of the United States. Washington. January 1992. P. 1, 7.

      28

      Ibid. P. 19–20.

      29

      Department of Defense. Adjusting to the Drawdown. Report of the Defense Conversion Commission. December 31, 1992. Washington, DC. P. 9, 18.

      30

      National Military Strategy of the United States. Washington. January 1992. P. 7–8.

      31

      National Military Strategy of the United States. Washington. January 1992. P. 10.

      32

      Ibid.