172 179
173 180
174 181
175 182
176 183
177 184
178 185
179 186
180 187
181 188
182 189
183 190
184 191
185 193
186 194
187 195
188 196
189 197
190 198
191 199
192 200
193 201
194 202
195 203
196 204
197 205
198 207
199 209
200 210
201 211
202 212
203 213
204 214
205 215
206 216
207 217
208 218
209 219
210 221
211 222
212 223
213 225
214 227
215 228
216 229
217 230
218 231
219 232
220 233
221 235
222 237
223 239
224 240
225 241
226 242
227 243
228 245
229 246
230 247
231 248
232 249
233 250
234 251
235 252
236 253
237 254
238 255
239 256
240 257
241 258
242 259
243 260
244 261
245 262
246 263
247 264
248 265
249 266
250 267
Preface
This is the sixth cumulative supplement to accompany The Law of Tax‐Exempt Healthcare Organizations, fourth edition. It reviews developments in the tax law affecting the tax‐exempt healthcare sector through 2020. It was a year of tumult, driven by the global response to a pandemic, made still more chaotic by a polarized government during an election year and an administration determined to deregulate while at the same time surprisingly adept at the rapid finalization of proposed rules in the tax‐exempt organization arena.
The congressional response to the COVID‐19 pandemic was to enact the largest economic stimulus legislation in U.S. history. The CARES Act impacted nonprofit healthcare organizations greatly by providing additional financial support after their rapid loss of revenue stemming from the cessation of traditional elective care and procedures and the ramp‐up to treat COVID patients. It included a forgivable loan program designed to ensure the maintenance of payrolls of which smaller healthcare organizations and related entities were able to take advantage. However, it was rolled out through ever‐changing real‐time “frequently asked questions” guidance that surely was never contemplated by the drafters of the Administrative Procedure Act.
In 2020, the IRS promulgated substantial proposed rules in connection with two major pieces of legislation, those pertaining to the allocation of expenses relative to unrelated business income under the “bucketing rule,” and the imposition of an excise tax on “excess compensation” received by executives of nonprofit organizations. Under the bucketing rule, an exempt organization with more than one unrelated business must compute unrelated business taxable income separately with respect to each unrelated business, as contrasted with the good old days when multiple unrelated trades or businesses could be aggregated together in order to reduce the tax bill. Under the excess compensation rule, if nonprofit executives receive compensation in excess of $1 million in salary or in certain retirement benefits, the employer is liable for a substantial excise tax payment on the amount in excess, with a carveout for income earned from certain medical services.
It would have been reasonable to assume that it would take some time for the IRS to digest comments received on these lengthy proposed regulations and to roll out final rules. Alas, this was not the case. Between the time that we began drafting this year's supplement in November and the return of the manuscript to us for review by the copyeditors in January, the final rules had already been published, necessitating a hasty update of these provisions in the supplement. We are at least pleased to report that this year's supplement is up‐to‐date, in these regards, as of February 1.
In other news, the IRS continued to tinker with compliance issues that have been challenging to regulate. These include continuing to impose the commerciality doctrine in a restrictive fashion on seemingly routine nonprofit business activities; enforcing the federal government's refusal to recognize the medicinal benefits of cannabis by declining to recognize exemption for nonprofits providing cannabis‐related services, by application of the public policy doctrine, notwithstanding the opposing viewpoint of a growing number of states; focusing virtually all of its audit activity on compliance by hospitals with the community health needs assessment provisions added to the Internal Revenue