318 296
319 297
320 298
321 299
322 300
323 301
324 302
325 303
326 304
327 305
328 306
329 307
330 308
331 309
332 310
333 311
334 312
335 313
336 314
337 315
338 316
339 317
340 318
341 319
342 320
343 321
344 322
345 323
346 324
347 325
348 326
349 327
350 328
351 329
352 330
353 331
354 332
355 333
356 334
357 335
358 336
359 337
360 338
361 339
362 340
363 341
364 342
365 343
366 344
367 345
368 346
369 347
370 348
371 349
372 350
373 351
374 352
375 353
376 354
377 355
378 356
379 357
380 358
381 359
382 360
383 361
384 362
385 363
386 364
387 365
388 366
389 367
390 368
391 369
392 370
393 371
394 372
395 373
396 374
397 375
398 376
399 377
400 378
401 379
402 380
403 381
404 382
405 383
406 384
407 385
408 386
409 387
410 388
411 389
412 390
413 391
414 392
415 393
416 394
417 395
418 396
419 397
420 398
421 399
422 400
423 401
424 402
425 403
426 404
427 405
428 406
429 407
430 408
SERIES EDITOR’S PREFACE
There is nothing new in the attempt to understand history as a whole. To know how humanity began and how it has come to its present condition is one of the oldest and most universal of human needs, expressed in the religious and philosophical systems of every civilization. But only in the past few decades has it begun to appear both necessary and possible to meet that need by means of a rational and systematic appraisal of current knowledge. Until the middle of the nineteenth century, history itself was generally treated as a subordinate branch of other fields of learning, of literature, rhetoric, law, philosophy, or religion.
When historians began to establish history’s independence as a field of scholarship in its own right, with its own subject matter and its own rules and methods, they made it in practice not the attempt to achieve a comprehensive account of the human past but the history of western Europe and of the societies created by European expansion and colonization. In laying the scholarly foundations of their discipline, they also reinforced the Enlightenment’s belief in the advance of “civilization” (and, more recently, of “western civilization”), and made it, with relatively minor regional variation, the basis of the teaching of history almost everywhere for most of the twentieth century. Research and teaching of the histories of other parts of the world developed mainly in the context of area studies like those of ancient Greece and Rome, dominated by philology, and conducted through the exposition of the canonical texts of their respective languages. World history as such remained the province of thinkers and writers principally interested in constructing theoretical or metaphysical systems.