Administrative Records for Survey Methodology. Группа авторов

Director of the Labor Dynamics Institute (LDI) at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://johnabowd.com. Ian M. Schmutte is Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. http://ianschmutte.org. Lars Vilhuber is Senior Research Associate in the Department of Economics and Executive Director of Labor Dynamics Institute (LDI) at Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://lars.vilhuber.com. The authors acknowledge the support of a grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (G-2015-13903), NSF Grants SES-1131848, BCS-0941226, TC-1012593. Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau, the National Science Foundation, or the Sloan Foundation. All results presented in this work stem from previously released work, were used by permission, and were previously reviewed to ensure that no confidential information is disclosed.

References

      1 Abowd, J.M. and McKinney, K.L. (2016). Noise infusion as a confidentiality protection measure for graph-based statistics. Statistical Journal of the IAOS 32 (1): 127–135. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI-160958.

      2 Abowd, J.M. and Schmutte, I.M. (2015). Economic analysis and statistical disclosure limitation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 50 (1): 221–267.

      3 Abowd, J.M. and Vilhuber, L. (2012). Did the housing price bubble clobber local labor market job and worker flows when it burst? The American Economic Review 102 (3): 589–593. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.3.589.

      4 Abowd, J.M., Haltiwanger, J., and Lane, J. (2004). Integrated longitudinal employer–employee data for the United States. The American Economic Review 94 (2): 224–229.

      5 Abowd, J.M., Stinson, M., and Benedetto, G. (2006). Final Report to the Social Security Administration on the SIPP/SSA/IRS Public Use File Project. 1813/43929. U.S. Census Bureau. http://hdl.handle.net/1813/43929.

      6 Abowd, J.M., Stephens, B.E., Vilhuber, L. et al. (2009). The LEHD infrastructure files and the creation of the quarterly workforce indicators. In: Producer Dynamics: New Evidence from Micro Data (eds. T. Dunne, J.B. Jensen and M.J. Roberts). University of Chicago Press.

      7 Abowd, J.M., Kaj Gittings, R., McKinney, K.L., et al. (2012). Dynamically consistent noise infusion and partially synthetic data as confidentiality protection measures for related time series. US Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Paper No. CES-WP-12-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2159800.

      8 Abowd, J.M., Schmutte, I.M., and Vilhuber, L. (2018). Disclosure avoidance and confidentiality protection in linked data. U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies Working Paper CES-WP-18-07.

      9 Australian Bureau of Statistics (2015). Media release – ABS response to privacy impact assessment. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/mediareleasesbyReleaseDate/C9FBD077C2C948AECA257F1E00205BBE?OpenDocument (accessed 05 August 2020).

      10 Bender, S. and Heining, J. (2011). The research-data-centre in research-data-centre approach: a first step towards decentralised international data sharing. IASSIST Quarterly/International Association for Social Science Information Service and Technology 35 (3) https://www.iassistquarterly.com/index.php/iassist/article/view/119.

      11 Browning, M., Jones, S., and Kuhn, P.J. (1995). Studies of the Interaction of UI and Welfare Using the COEP Dataset. LU2-153/224-1995E, Unemployment Insurance Evaluation Series. Ottawa: Human Resources Development Canada. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2015/rhdcc-hrsdc/LU2-153-224-1995-eng.pdf.

      12 Bruno, G., D’Aurizio, L., and Tartaglia-Polcini, R. (2009). Remote processing of firm microdata at the Bank of Italy. No. 36, Bank of Italy. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1396224 (accessed 05 August 2020).

      13 Bruno, G., D’Aurizio, L., and Tartaglia-Polcini, R. (2014). Remote processing of business microdata at the Bank of Italy. In: Statistical Methods and Applications from a Historical Perspective, Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics (eds. F. Crescenzi and S. Mignani), 239–249. Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-05552-7_21.

      14 Center for Economic Studies (2016). LODES Version 7. OTM20160223. U.S. Census Bureau. http://lehd.ces.census.gov/doc/help/onthemap/OnTheMapDataOverview.pdf (accessed 05 August 2020).

      15 Currie, R. and Fortin, S. (2015). Social statistics matter: history of the Canadian Research Data Center Network. Canadian Research Data Centre Network. http://rdc-cdr.ca/sites/default/files/social-statistics-matter-crdcn-history.pdf (accessed 05 August 2020).

      16 Dalenius, T. and Reiss, S.P. (1982). Data-swapping: a technique for disclosure control. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 6 (1): 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3758(82)90058-1.

      17 Deang, L.P. and Davies, P.S. (2009). Access restrictions and confidentiality protections in the Health and Retirement Study. No. 2009–01, U.S. Social Security Administration. https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/rsnotes/rsn2009-01.html.

      18 DeSalvo, B., Limehouse, F.F., and Klimek, S.D. (2016). Documenting the business register and related economic business data. Working Papers 16–17. Center for Economic Studies. U.S. Census Bureau. https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/wpaper/16-17.html.

      19 Duncan, G.T., Jabine, T.B., and de Wolf, V.A. (eds.); Panel on Confidentiality and Data Access, Committee on National Statistics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council and the Social Science Research Council (1993). Private Lives and Public Policies: Confidentiality and Accessibility of Government Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

      20 Duncan, G.T., Elliot, M., and Salazar-González, J.J. (2011). Statistical Confidentiality: Principles and Practice, Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: Springer-Verlag.

      21 Dwork, C. (2006). Differential privacy. In: Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4052 (eds. M. Bugliesi, B. Preneel, V. Sassone and I. Wegener), 1–12. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/11787006_1.

      22 Dwork, C. and Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science 9 (3–4): 211–407. https://doi.org/10.1561/0400000042.

      23 Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., Smith, A. (2006). Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Theory of Cryptography Conference, pp. 265–284.

      24 Dwork, C., Smith, A., Steinke, T., Ullman, T. (2017). Exposed! A Survey of Attacks on Private Data. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4 (1): 61–84.

      25 Evans, T., Zayatz, L., and Slanta, J. (1998). Using noise for disclosure limitation