Introduction written by Marc-Eric BOBILLIER CHAUMON.
1
Emerging Technologies and Issues for Activity and Occupational Health
The question of the introduction of emerging technologies and their constant renewal in organizations fundamentally refers to the place and role that these devices play in business, as well as how they can affect activity and health at work. Considered as a prospective reflection attempting to grasp the logic and modalities of the digital transformations underway, the ambition of this chapter is: (1) first, to identify and characterize the emerging technologies that are being deployed in the company; (2) to discuss their impact on the activity and well-being of employees, demonstrating the uses and paradoxical effects that these devices may have on work; and (3) finally, to reflect on the psychosocial function of these devices as potential operators of health and development of the profession.
1.1. Introduction
For several years now, we have been witnessing a major reconfiguration of the conditions in which work is carried out, in their nature (intensification, dematerialization, acceleration), in their modalities (remote working, nomadism, fragmentation, virtual teams) and in their reference points (fragmentation and dispersion of activity, multi-activity), due to the deployment of innovative technical solutions which are multiplying. The impact on the human factor is not neutral. The implementation of these emerging devices can, at best, provoke simple transfers of use and learning; they are iterative or incremental technologies. At worst, they can lead to real disruptions in use; they are then disruptive technologies (Bobillier Chaumon 2017). The latter require a profound rethinking of the user experience, requiring new ways of doing, thinking, organizing and collaborating at work. New organizational and socio-cognitive models are then required to work with these devices (de Terssac and Bazet 2007; Ajzen et al. 2015), with strong implications for the health and well-being of employees (Bobillier et al. 2015). Anastassova (2006) and Loup-Escande and Burkhardt (2019) identify four specific characteristics of emerging technologies: (1) an innovative character, an important technological advance, partially achieved or in the making; (2) unclear and undifferentiated uses; (3) several limitations that slow down its massive application; and (4) a promise of transformation of the economic and social context in which it will be introduced.
The goal of this chapter is to question the place and impact that these emerging technologies can have in the often paradoxical transformations and development of activity. The first step will be to identify and characterize the emerging technologies that are being deployed in companies. Then, we will discuss the impact they may have on professionals and their activity.
1.2. From properties to the uses of emerging technologies
Disruptive digital innovation manifests itself through a variety of technologies that are being deployed in a number of business sectors. Thus, collaborative robots (cobots, exoskeletons), communicating, ambient or ubiquitous technologies (Internet of Things), artificial intelligence (voice assistants, decision support systems), evaluative and predictive data exploitation (Big Data), immersive environments (virtual and/or augmented reality) and new modalities of human–machine interaction (haptics, sensory, cognitive technologies of BIM (brain interface machine) type – brain interface machine) find applications in various fields of our professional and socio-domestic life. They can be found with the factory of the future, the hospital of the future, the smart home, autonomous transport, connected health (HCS/home care service, HS/home support; Martineau and Bobillier Chaumon 2017) or in the services offered by digital work platforms (uberization, robotics; Casilli 2019).
In order to understand the impact of technologies on professional activity and to identify research and societal issues that are addressed to the scientific community, it is necessary beforehand to clarify what they cover in terms of uses and practices, as well as what they bring in terms of resources and constraints.
1) Collaborative robots (also called cobots) are assistants, which remain dependent on the intention, gesture or behavior of humans at work. They support the employee in his/her actions and adjust their interventions to those of the professional. It is no longer simply a robotic substitute or a form of mechanical assistance for particular tasks. Here, robotics becomes symbiotic (Brangier et al. 2009), that is, it extends (like an extension) the individual by enabling the increase of human capacities in terms of strength, speed or precision. In this new context of interaction where these mobile and learning systems evolve, new forms of cooperation and human–robot interfaces (HRIs) are to be imagined and deployed. The exoskeleton constitutes a special class of cobots. It is a device for electrically, pneumatically or hydraulically amplifying the movement of each segment of the body. This kind of external skeleton allows movements, load handling and tool management that the body alone would not be able to perform (Claverie et al. 2013). The return of sensation is then immediate, and we witness a certain form of global person–machine consciousness, a hybrid body schema, or what Merle (2012) calls “the illusion of uniqueness”. However, we must be careful, because these exoskeletons that are grafted onto the human body strongly constrain body movements and gestures. It is more about adjusting to this “mechanical corset” than the other way around: the actions of the body can be repressed or even prevented, with possible impacts on the physical health of employees (increase in musculoskeletal disorders – MSDs).
2) Ambient, ubiquitous or pervasive technologies constitute a second class of these emerging innovations, more generally known as the “Internet of Things” (IoT) or connected/communicating objects. These discrete (because they are non-intrusive) technologies are integrated into everyday objects (Nehmer et al. 2006). They seek to capture activity and trigger the appropriate actions, without the need for human intervention (Gossardt 2017) (e.g. the thermostat that communicates with the personal calendar to turn on the heating at the appropriate time). These can be sensors scattered throughout the living or working space to record physical activities (quantified-self; Zouinar 2019), to inform the individual and thus fight against sedentariness: people are then made aware of what they are doing, what they are not doing – well or not well enough – and what they should do better (concept of “technological persuasion”, nudge technology or captology; Fogg 2002). There are also digital tracers integrated into production lines to evaluate, in real time, the conformity of professional actions to expected standards. Maintenance is no longer merely corrective, it becomes predictive. That is, we are able to react before the error is made by measuring the nut and bolt too, if it is wrong or not tight enough. This is the idea of the connected factory of the future (Factory 4.0).
3) Artificial