Student Engagement Techniques. Elizabeth F. Barkley. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Elizabeth F. Barkley
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Учебная литература
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781119686897
Скачать книгу
Major, 2016, CoLT 14) Reading Active Reading Documents (ARDs). Carefully prepared forms guide students through the process of critical and careful reading. (Barkley & Major, 2018, ALT 1) Discussing Two-Minute Question-Development Talks (TQDTs). Student pairs share ideas and information about out-of-class assignments. Their exchange involves two questions: “What was the main thing you learned from the assignment?” “What questions about the assignments do you have?” (Barkley & Major, 2018, ALT 3) Writing Dyadic Essays: Students write essay questions/model answers, exchange questions, and after responding compare their answers to the model answer. (Barkley & Major, 2016, CoLT 26)

      Just engaging students in a given task is not sufficient. It is not safe, for example, to conclude that if students are talking to each other they are learning. It is equally risky to conclude that students are learning when they are listening to other students talking. Something beyond the task has to happen for active learning to occur.

      The challenge for faculty who wish to employ active learning techniques to promote deeper, more active learning is to find techniques that can help students move from level 1 (low) to level 3 (high) on the continuum in terms of their mental activity, whatever the learning task happens to be. Active learning techniques are a vehicle to help students not only take on the task but also engage in the higher levels of active learning.

LearningTask Level of Mental Activity
1 Low 2 Moderate 3 High
Listening Listens for facts and information Maintains concerted attention while trying to understand the message and to formulate questions about the message Expresses interest and enthusiasm; attempts to critique and evaluate the message; monitors own attention
Problem-solving Solves the problem Recognizes the underlying structure of the problem Considers the processes for solving the problem and self-monitors efforts and progress
Reading Seeks facts and information Seeks structural understanding Seeks meaning and monitors own reading engagement; investigates related readings and resources
Discussing Relays facts Conveys ideas and concepts and encourages others Shares personal perspectives and seeks to understand others; argues and evaluates concepts; self-monitors participation
Writing Describes and defines Explains and applies; expresses personal perspectives; seeks out references Critiques, evaluates, and creates; seeks to express personal perspectives and connect with others' ideas; monitors progress and assesses quality

      Learning is a dynamic process in which learners literally “build” their own minds by constantly making and changing connections between what is new and what is already known. Deep, long-term learning occurs when changed connections result in reformatted structures—whether these structures are described as schemata or neuronal networks. As much as we (and often students!) would like to think that we as teachers can simply transfer knowledge into learners' brains, it is simply not possible. Students need to do the work required to learn. We can help them by setting up conditions for active learning. By being active participants in their own learning, students “build” their own minds at the level of involvement required for engaged learning.

       [g]enuinely engaging their spirit, their experience, and their perspective. A mere strategy does not create such a milieu. [It is] the result of a determined living harmony, a constancy of practices blended with ideals from the beginning to the end of every lesson of every session of every course. (Wlodkowski, 2008, p. 169)

      Thus, in the following sections, we turn our attention to how teachers can work to create synergy between motivation and active learning.

      IN OUR MODEL of student engagement, motivation and active learning are twin helices that work together synergistically. How can we promote this synergy? We propose that there are classroom conditions that function somewhat like steps or rungs between the two sides of the double helix spiral. These conditions, because they integrate elements of both motivation and active learning, contribute to the synergy that promotes increased levels of engagement.