Educational Foundations
Fourth Edition
“The educator has the duty of not being neutral.”
Paulo Freire, We Make the Road by Walking: Conversations on Education and Social Change
Educational Foundations
An Anthology of Critical Readings
Fourth Edition
Editors
Alan S. Canestrari
Roger Williams University
Bruce A. Marlowe
University of South Carolina Beaufort
Los Angeles
London
New Delhi
Singapore
Washington DC
Melbourne
FOR INFORMATION:
SAGE Publications, Inc.
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, California 91320
E-mail: [email protected]
SAGE Publications Ltd.
1 Oliver’s Yard
55 City Road
London EC1Y 1SP
United Kingdom
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.
B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
Mathura Road, New Delhi 110 044
India
SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.
18 Cross Street #10-10/11/12
China Square Central
Singapore 048423
Copyright © 2021 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. Except as permitted by U.S. copyright law, no part of this work may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
All third-party trademarks referenced or depicted herein are included solely for the purpose of illustration and are the property of their respective owners. Reference to these trademarks in no way indicates any relationship with, or endorsement by, the trademark owner.
Printed in the United States of America
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Canestrari, Alan S., editor. | Marlowe, Bruce A., editor.
Title: Educational foundations : an anthology of critical readings / Alan S. Canestrari, Roger Williams University, Bruce A. Marlowe, University of South Carolina.
Description: Fourth edition. | Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE, [2021] | Includes index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2020015505 | ISBN 9781544388168 (paperback)
Subjects: LCSH: Critical pedagogy. | Teaching. | Teachers.
Classification: LCC LC196 .E393 2021 | DDC 370.11/5—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020015505
This book is printed on acid-free paper.
Acquisitions Editor: Leah Fargotstein
Editorial Assistant: Natalie Elliott
Production Editor: Astha Jaiswal
Copy Editor: Mark Bast
Typesetter: C&M Digitals (P) Ltd.
Indexer: Integra
Cover Designer: Candice Harman
Marketing Manager: Victoria Velasquez
Preface
Since the publication of the last edition of this anthology, Barack Obama succeeded George W. Bush as president of the United States. They both promised a better education “deal” for children and their families. Bush promised to close the “achievement gap” with the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), euphemistically referred to as No Child Left Behind (NCLB). Eight years later, Barack Obama was elected president in the midst of a recession. As part of a nationwide stimulus package, Obama created a competitive grant incentive program for the states called Race to the Top. States could be granted money if they complied with the prescribed reform and or “school turnaround” interventions set forth in the administration’s educational vision. Did much change for children and their families?
Diane Ravitch, a former undersecretary of education in the Bush administration, once a supporter of the conservative educational agenda, has since become an outspoken critic of Bush’s “Texas deal” and Obama’s “deal.” In an interview about her book The Death and Life of the Great American School System, she told about her dramatic about-face and remarked, “The Obama administration, although it promised change when it came to office, in effect [has] picked up precisely the same themes as the George W. Bush administration, which are testing and choice—and I think we’re on the wrong track.”
It is now 2020 and we have a new president who boasts of his “deal” artistry. Is education on the right track now? Does the “Trump Education Deal” signal any real departure from the two previous administrations? If Trump’s appointment of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education is any indication, then the answer is . . . no. DeVos, a leading school-choice advocate, has been criticized for her lack of experience as a public school education administrator, a public school backer, or a public school parent for that matter. Her positions are clear. She opposes teachers’ unions and collective bargaining, supports the deregulation of charter schools, and favors the expansion of vouchers and continued testing. Status quo preserved.
More than ever, educational decisions are based on political calculations. As you soon will discover, important questions about what schools should look like, about curriculum, and about assessment are being answered, increasingly, by people furthest removed from schools, teachers, and young people. Remarkably, there is broad consensus among those in the political class and agreement too among membership of the nation’s corporate elite about how best to answer these questions. Indeed, when it comes to education policy, there is no longer an ideological clash between Democrats and Republicans.
Since our first edition, the neo-liberal reform agenda has come to dominate American public education. Its “at-risk” mind-set, characterized by an almost singular focus on how our schools are failing, has resulted in narrow directives now firmly embedded within public education. What once appeared as isolated news stories and cause for local embarrassment—teaching to the test, scripted curricula, mindless repetition of facts—is now openly advocated without chagrin by local and state school officials. Yearly test results have emerged as the most important measure of the worth of our schools despite the fact that such assessments obfuscate the complexity of schooling and serve to short-circuit deeper understanding of student learning and high-quality teaching.
Can such an at-risk educational vision serve to renew and sustain our nation, our democracy, and our schools?