Speaking of the Fantastic III. Брайан Герберт. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Информация о произведении:

Автор:	Брайан Герберт
Издательство:	Ingram
Серия:
Жанр произведения:	Научная фантастика
Год издания:	0
isbn:	9781434448460

Скачать книгу

BORGO PRESS BOOKS BY DARRELL SCHWEITZER

Conan’s World and Robert E. Howard

Deadly Things: A Collection of Mysterious Tales

Exploring Fantasy Worlds

The Fantastic Horizon: Essays and Reviews

Ghosts of Past and Future: Selected Poetry

The Robert E. Howard Reader

Speaking of Horror II

Speaking of the Fantastic III: Interviews with Science Fiction Writers

SPEAKING OF THE FANTASTIC III

INTERVIEWS WITH SCIENCE FICTION WRITERS

DARRELL SCHWEITZER

I.O. Evans Studies in the

Philosophy and Criticism of Literature

ISSN 0271-9061

Number Fifty-Seven

Published by Wildside Press LLC

www.wildsidebooks.com

DEDICATION

For Oz Fontecchio,

Patron of the arts,

A faithful and tireless

Friend of science fiction.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

These interviews were previously published as follows, and are reprinted (with minor editing, updating, and textual modifications) by permission of the author:

INTRODUCTION

I’ve been interviewing for most of my life now, and so most of what I have to say about interviewing I have said before, in introductions to books like this one, beginning with the original T.K. Graphics version of SF Voices in 1976. I did my first interview in 1973, which involved a very young Gardner Dozois, an even younger version of myself, and a college chum who came along to make sure the borrowed tape recorder kept working. The result, which appeared underneath a photo of a long-haired Gardner glaring down from a height and alongside (in the other front-page column) a photo of David Bowie at his most androgynous, appeared in 1973 in a Philadelphia “underground” newspaper called The Drummer (as in “a different drummer”) which was given away on campuses and sold on newsstands as a supplement to a larger publication called (I kid you not) The Daily Planet. Yes, like Clark Kent I really was a (presumably) mild-mannered reporter for The Daily Planet.

Even then I instinctively grasped the basics of a good interview, which may be summed up in the following rather run-on sentence: Find someone interesting and articulate, ask just enough questions to get them talking, then point the microphone, shut up, and, oh, by the way, make sure your equipment works.

After that early success I have hopefully improved my technique over the years and learned to ask more intelligent questions, but the basic principle has remained the same. I am not the star of the interview. The interviewee is. Interviews are not news, and therefore do not lose their inherent interest as soon as the forthcoming books the author is talking about have come out, but are instead informal moments in time, captured in context. In an earlier introduction like this I compared it to catching Homer right after he had finished the Iliad and could only say, “I am thinking about doing a sequel.” Or, put it this way. The H. G. Wells of 1898, right after the publication of The War of the Worlds, would have very likely had a very different view of writing, science fiction, and the future of mankind than the Wells of 1940, who would have been a lot gloomier, political, and, very likely, out of touch with the field of literature he had helped to inspire. (But if Wells had held opinions about the John W. Campbell revolution and the work of the early Heinlein, don’t you wish some interviewer had managed to get that on record?)

Certainly many aspects of interviewing today are themselves science fiction by the standards of 1973, when I started. I am writing this introduction on a computer, into a file which consists of the rest of the book, assembled from earlier files, which I have edited into a uniform format. There was a time when all this was done on a manual typewriter, with, at best a bit of literal cut-and-paste involving scissors, glue, and a photocopier.

Today, interviews can be done via e-mail. I have met Zoran Zivkovic since, but when I interviewed him I had not. He was in Belgrade and I was in Philadelphia. We communicated easily and instantaneously, with the result coming out in typesettable form. Now that’s progress. I can barely imagine what it was like before the days of any recording equipment, when the interviewer’s job was to engage his subject in conversation, then hurry to his desk and write down as much as he could remember as quickly as possible. In the old days, most interviewees tended to freeze up at the sight of someone taking their words down in shorthand. Fortunately today most people are used to microphones, and do not lose their spontaneity in front of them. I continue to prefer to interview people in-person, with a tape recorder, but I have learned to do interviews via e-mail instead. It’s not the same as paper correspondence. It is a new skill, which nobody imagined a need for in 1973. If you’re good at it, it can be nearly as spontaneous as speech.

But the principle is still the same. The idea is to get free-flowing conversation which illuminates the subject’s thinking and his work, and which can go off in surprising tangents, quite

Скачать книгу