The Cure for GOD'S Epidemic. Roshi Bharat. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Roshi Bharat
Издательство: Ingram
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Прочая образовательная литература
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9781456622848
Скачать книгу
Buddha statue of Bamyan. It was just a statue, but hatred caused by this virus destroyed it without the people knowing that they are destroying their own treasure. Such virus impact is beyond imagination, one cannot think what it can make people do. It is the most dangerous virus infecting humanity.

      Another important aspect of this viral control may be found in inhibitions and prohibitions which keep the believer focused on rituals and actions that reinforce the religion on a daily, even hourly basis. Like fasting on Friday or bowing on the street and thus disturbing traffic on a particular day or shouting from religious places. Just as the rabies virus takes over the brain of the raccoon and reprograms it to bite other animals, in the same way priests spend most of the time in directing their energies to spread their virus by controlling the mind of people. For this they will visit people’s houses, sprinkle water, perform puja, and perform havan to support themselves and at the same time spreading the virus efficiently. Thus said, Albert Einstein in “Religion and World Peace”:

      “It has not done so up to now” Albert Einstein replied to a reporter's question, “Will religion promote peace?”

      Albert Einstein also said, “Don't take the fools in clerical garb seriously.”

      “To take those fools in clerical garb seriously is to show them too much honor” said Albert Einstein, in “Comment on the Union of Orthodox Rabbis” after expelling a rabbi because of his disbelief in God as a personal entity. [Einstein's God - Albert Einstein's Quest as a Scientist and as a Jew to Replace a Forsaken God (1997)]

      This is what great minds of the new age said about religion. We can see how they were aware of this virus. Religion does three things quite effectively: divides people, controls people, and deludes people. [Carle pie Mary, Alice McKinney]

      Finally, if the world has to overcome this virus and control this virus this book will pave the way. By reading this much, one might think it is an atheistic idea, but it is not. This book will take you back to the sages of antiquity and will form the base from where one can get out of the reach of such dangerous God Viruses.

      “When a man is freed of religion, he has a better chance to live a normal and wholesome life” said Sigmund Freud.

      Let’s analyze the God virus in the major religions of today.

      God Virus in Christianity

      The first and foremost question to followers of this religion is what is the concept of the Holy Trinity.

      According to this concept, God, Son and Holy Spirit are one and same. If this is the case, then how come Jesus sacrificed himself? Sacrifice means when you give something of your own for someone or “forfeiture of something highly valued for the sake of one considered to have a greater value or claim.”

      If Jesus is God and the Holy Spirit, then what did he sacrifice on the cross. The Holy Spirit can never die and when he can never die, then who died on the cross? It seems Holy Spirit came into the body named Jesus and then went out of the body and again came back into the body after a few days and again went back. Thus, it clearly shows that no one died and it was fraud done in front of people. People were misguided by the Holy Spirit and it is a big lie. This in itself, shakes the basic foundation of Christianity.

      Even if I consider that he came back after a few days, what did he sacrifice. He got the same body back and fooled people. I am sure this is a story made by some smart person.

      Though Christianity talks about the love of God and God loves its followers, let’s then analyze Ten Commandments which form the basis of its good teachings and you decide yourself after this.

      Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

      I find a great problem in this first law, especially in the United States and India where you are free to follow any religion, though India is in a very dangerous situation where Hinduism is being wiped out very systematically. This is a conflict with the concept of religious freedom. If God of the Bible says that he is the only God, then definitely it makes the God of other religion’s books false and this will bear animosity. Don’t you think the book of the Hindus called Bhagvat Gita should be followed as God? Krishna himself says that to follow any path, but the final destination is one. So imagine one billion Hindus by this law are considered pagans and will go to Hell. On contrary, if we follow Krishna, it will bring world peace as all are right in following their own path.

      “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me.” [Exodus 20:4-6 (KJV)].

      If someone makes an image of a tree or some beautiful statue and starts worshiping it--starts bowing in front of it--what will happen? Shouldn’t these people be free to do so? So, if someone wants to make a graven image and bow in front of it then as per this law God will hate such person. God says I am jealous so does it not mean such God does not have universal love and loves only a few, like a big Mafia don and likes his followers while dooming others. Thus idol worshipers will go to hell.

      At this point one can ask what about the cross which Christians put in cars and wear on necks and keep on kissing and bowing at different times. Is this not the worst kind of idol worship? Where you keep thinking about Christ in the car and kiss it while thinking about Christ, then the cross is not an object or idol? Hindus create goddess and gods, decorate them knowing that God is ONE but can be seen in any form, object or idol or thing to remember and worship.

      Thus we can see, all are involved in graven images–be that the cross, or an idol. The statement “I the Lord thy God am a jealous God” is really an astonishing one and I cannot understand it even now, what kind of God is this, most powerful in existence, creator of the universe and only real God, how can he be jealous of anything. Is jealousy a virtue or vice? Further, when it is mentioned about a third or fourth generation, is it really plausible? I leave it to readers to apply their logic here.

      Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

      According to the dictionary, “vain” means “producing no results or useless”. I asked my Xian missionary friend, “What does it mean?” He replied, “We should not call his name until required” Based on this answer, it seems to be most absurd law in the history of mankind. I think we all have done this crime when we say “Oh God” or “My God”. In fun we say “Wow God, I love this”, “My God” and “Darn God” and so on. This violates basic freedom rights of humans who call out the word God any time. What a law which conflicts with basic human rights. It is a violation of free speech from the Constitution.

      This has following threat to people:

      •Don't make graven images of anything

      •Don't create any likeness of anything.

      •Don't bow down and worship graven images

      •If you do this I will punish you, your children, your grandchildren and your great grandchildren

      This would require destruction of civic art and architecture on a massive scale in the U.S., India and elsewhere. This is just like the Taliban, who on the name of Islam did same to Afghanistan’s Buddha statue. The second apparently would extend the prohibition against any visual depictions of object, including photographs and cartoons.

      The third contravenes national and international legal protections.

      The final threat, while fortunately unenforceable in any real manner, is decidedly unpleasant, unfair and vindictive.

      This