IN DEFENCE
OF THE TERROR
Liberty or Death in the French Revolution
Sophie Wahnich
Translated by David Fernbach
With a Foreword by Slavoj Žižek
This English-language edition first published by Verso 2012
© Verso 2012
Translation © David Fernbach 2012
First published as La liberté ou la mort: Essai sur la Terreur et le terrorisme
© La Fabrique éditions 2003
Introduction © Slavoj Žižek 2012
All rights reserved
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2
Verso
UK: 6 Meard Street, London W1F 0EG
US: 20 Jay Street, Suite 1010, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Verso is the imprint of New Left Books
Ebook ISBN-13: 978-1-84467-928-7
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Wahnich, Sophie.
[Liberté ou la mort. English.]
In defence of the terror : liberty or death in the French Revolution / Sophie Wahnich ; translated by David Fernbach ; with a foreword by Slavojıiıek.
p. cm.
Original publication: Paris : La Fabrique Éditions, c2003: La liberté ou la mort.
Includes bibliographical references.
ISBN 978-1-84467-862-4 (hardback) -- ISBN 978-1-84467-933-1 (ebook)
1. France--History--Reign of Terror, 1793-1794. 2. France--History--Revolution, 1789-1799. 3. France--Politics and government--1789-1799. 4. Terrorism. I. Title.
DC176.5.W3413 2012
944.04’4--dc23
2012013023
For Lorenzo and Julia
CONTENTS
Foreword: The Dark Matter of Violence, Or, Putting Terror in Perspective by Slavoj Žižek
Introduction: An Intolerable Revolution
1. The Emotions in the Demand for Terror
3. The Terror as a Long Cycle of Vengeance: Towards a Reinterpretation of the Laws of Terror
Conclusion: The Terror and Terrorism
I want never to forget how I was forced to become – for how long? – a monster of justice and intolerance, a narrow-minded simplifier, an arctic character uninterested in anyone who was not in league with him to kill the dogs of hell.
– René Char1
FOREWORD: THE DARK MATTER OF VIOLENCE, OR, PUTTING TERROR IN PERSPECTIVE
Slavoj Žižek
From time to time, a book appears about which we can say: we were not waiting merely for a book like this; this is the book we were waiting for. Sophie Wahnich’s In Defence of the Terror is such a rare book: it cuts into the very heart of today’s ethico-political predicament. How can a book about the French Revolution do this?
When, in 1953, Zhou En Lai, the Chinese premier, was in Geneva for the peace negotiations to end the Korean war, a French journalist asked him what he thought about the French Revolution; Chou replied: ‘It is still too early to tell.’ The events of 1990 proved him spectacularly right: with the disintegration of the ‘people’s democracies’, the struggle for the historical place of the French Revolution flared up again. The liberal revisionists tried to impose the notion that the demise of communism in 1989 occurred at exactly the right moment: it marked the end of the era which began in 1789, the final failure of the statist-revolutionary model which first entered the scene with the Jacobins.
Nowhere is the dictum ‘every history is a history of the present’ more true than in the case of the French Revolution: its historiographical reception has always closely mirrored the twists and turns of later political struggles. The identifying mark of all kinds of conservatives is a predictably flat rejection: the French Revolution was a catastrophe from its very beginning. The product of the godless modern mind, it is at the same time to be interpreted as God’s judgement on humanity’s wicked ways – so its traces should of course be kicked over as thoroughly as possible. The typical liberal attitude is a more differentiated one: its formula is ‘1789 without 1793’. In short, what the sensitive liberals want is a decaffeinated revolution, a revolution which does not smell of a revolution. François Furet proposed another liberal approach: he tried to deprive the French Revolution of its status as the founding event of modern democracy, relegating it to a historical anomaly. In short, Furet’s aim was to de-eventalize the French Revolution: it is no longer (as for a tradition stemming from Kant and Hegel) the defining moment of modernity, but a local accident with no global significance, one conditioned by the specifically French tradition of absolute monarchy. Jacobin state centralism is only possible, then, against the background of the ‘L’état c’est moi’ of Louis XIV. There was a historical necessity to assert the modern principles of personal freedom, etc., but – as the English example demonstrates – the same could have been much more effectively achieved in a more peaceful way . . . Radicals are, on the contrary, possessed by what Alain Badiou called the ‘passion of the Real’: if you say A – equality, human rights and freedoms – then you should not shirk its consequences but instead gather the courage to say B – the terror needed to really defend and assert A.
Both liberal and conservative critics of the French Revolution present it as a founding event of modern ‘totalitarianism’: the taproot of all the worst evils of the twentieth century – the Holocaust, the Gulag, up to the 9/11 attacks – is to be sought in the Jacobin ‘Reign of Terror’. The perpetrators of Jacobin crimes are either denounced as bloodthirsty monsters, or, in a more nuanced approach, one admits that they were personally honest and pure, but then adds that this very feature made their fanaticism all the more dangerous. The conclusion is thus the well-known cynical wisdom: better corruption than ethical purity, better a direct lust for power than obsession with one’s mission.1
Wahnich’s book systematically undermines this predominant doxa. In a detailed historical analysis of the stages of Jacobin Terror, she first demonstrates how this Terror was not an uncontrolled explosion of destructive madness, but a precisely planned and controlled attempt to prevent such an explosion. She does what Furet wanted to do, but from