<--- Score
13. What is the definition of Team composition excellence?
<--- Score
14. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
15. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
16. What gets examined?
<--- Score
17. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
18. What Team composition requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
19. How do you gather Team composition requirements?
<--- Score
20. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
21. Is there a Team composition management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
22. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
23. What is the context?
<--- Score
24. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
25. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
26. Has a Team composition requirement not been met?
<--- Score
27. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
28. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
29. Will team members regularly document their Team composition work?
<--- Score
30. Do you have a Team composition success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
31. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?
<--- Score
32. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
33. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
34. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
35. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
36. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
37. Does the team have regular meetings?
<--- Score
38. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
39. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
40. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Team composition brings?
<--- Score
41. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
42. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
43. What is the scope of Team composition?
<--- Score
44. What Team composition services do you require?
<--- Score
45. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
46. What is the scope?
<--- Score
47. What happens if Team composition’s scope changes?
<--- Score
48. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?
<--- Score
49. What is the scope of the Team composition effort?
<--- Score
50. How did the Team composition manager receive input to the development of a Team composition improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
51. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
52. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
53. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
54. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
55. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
56. Have all basic functions of Team composition been defined?
<--- Score
57. How do you build the right business case?
<--- Score
58. What is the worst case scenario?
<--- Score
59. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
60. Is there a clear Team composition case definition?
<--- Score
61. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
62. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
63. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
64. Is Team composition currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
65. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
66. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
67. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
68.