For Boccaccio’s three sisters of Marseille and their lovers, Venice’s malleable “justice” led to their demise—in the narrative logic of the tale, a fair penalty for “the vice of anger.”80 This legal flexibility, however, as we will see, did not always punish those outside the colonial administration but offered particular advantages to other inhabitants of the island—including individual Jews and the Jewish community as a whole. Instead of imposing a uniform law on all subjects, the colonial system of rule in Crete reflected and acknowledged the social diversity of the island, particularly in the division of courts of first instance between Latin and Greek speakers (or between Venetian citizens and Venetian subjects, onto which these language groups mapped) and in its accommodation of local precedents and customary law into its judicial decision making.
Not only was the notion of Venetian justice well known to contemporaries, as the Decameron highlights, but it has also become a central discussion in modern scholarly circles, particularly focusing on notions of justice among the patrician elite in the city of Venice itself. Venice’s emphasis on the tropes of justice and equality, its approach to crime and punishment, and the place of law in its civil life have become a major focus in Venetian historiography, particularly from the fourteenth century.81 These studies tend to focus on criminal law and thus give a particular view of what constituted justice—a justice reflected through incarceration and punishment, in which violence plays a central role. But the rhetorical language of justice and equality also played a significant role in the civil courtrooms of Venice, where justice represented “a resource that could be used by the populace in pursuit of their own strategies.”82 And it played a particularly important role as a colonial tool through which to appease and placate Venetian subjects.
Though some Candiote Jews encountered Venice’s criminal justice system on the island, most Jewish involvement with colonial justice came through the civil court. Thus the particular ways in which justice was interpreted by the judiciary when Jews were involved—including by respecting and incorporating Jewish law into adjudication and providing equal access to the civil courtroom for subjects, Jewish and Orthodox alike—shed new light on the meaning of these concepts so central to Venetian state ideology.
* * *
This study is not intended to be a synthetic account Crete’s medieval Jews. Rather, each chapter offers a new lens onto Jewish life and its relation to the island and the island’s colonial legal system. Chapter 1 introduces the Jews of Candia, their communal structure, and the evolution of the community from the thirteenth century. Chapter 2 looks to quotidian Jewish-Christian relations, considering the role of economics and space in fostering meaningful interactions between these groups. Moving beyond individually driven interactions between Jews and Christians, Chapter 3 considers the role of the state in controlling and fostering Jewish engagement with Christians; influencing and controlling Christian attitudes toward Jews and toward typical anti-Jewish tropes; and in limiting the impact of anti-Jewish claims through the reliance on the Venetian judiciary. Chapter 4 begins a series of three chapters focusing predominantly on Jewish use of colonial justice to dispute against their coreligionists. This chapter asks why the Jews of Crete chose to litigate against each other in secular courts and surveys the general variety of cases that Jews brought against each other. Chapter 5 looks at cases of marital strife in which a spouse (usually the wife) sought redress before the ducal court. Chapter 6 returns to the elite leadership and the ways in which it marshaled Venetian justice, in the process inviting Venetian intervention into the workings of everyday Jewish self-rule.
* * *
In some respects, the Jews of Venetian Crete lived out elements of Boccaccio’s colonial fantasy. They lived in a Mediterranean society that afforded them enough distance from the power center to enjoy a freedom uncommon for medieval Jews. At the same time, Candia was also central enough to access the economic, social, and intellectual currents of the Middle Sea and beyond. This is a tale of the consequences of such a tension, between the center and the periphery, not only in space but in culture and religion. It is also a study of the implications of other familiar tensions: the community and the individual; social pragmatism and religious ideology; political expedience and judicial rigor. But most of all, it is a tale of lives—of individuals, families, and communities—intersecting with each other and with the state in a highly mobile world.
Chapter 1
The Jewish Community of Candia
Late one Friday afternoon in 1546, Elia Capsali—rabbi, historian, and leader of the Jewish community of Candia—walked home from the ducal palace. He had been visiting with his “beloved” friend Carlo Capello, the current duke of Crete.1 As he exited the ducal palace Capsali found himself on the city’s central piazza. It was still commonly known as the Plateia (Greek for “the town square”) in 1546, even though Venice had officially renamed it St. Mark’s Square centuries before, soon after it settled its military colonists in the town in the early thirteenth century.
The Plateia was the buzzing nerve center of Candia, and as Capsali entered the square, he saw the municipal and business centers of the city, including the main marketplace, currency exchange, merchants’ loggia, and the Latin church of Saint Mark. As he entered the open square, Capsali must have inescapably drawn in the scents of food sellers’ stalls and the acrid tang from smiths’ workshops. Merchants loudly hawked all sorts of wares, from bread to horseshoes, from their rented benches. He might have heard the sudden hushed attention to public announcements made by the public crier in the central arcade, or lobium. At one time or another, he surely saw a criminal doing time in the berlina, the pillory set up in the square.2 Though the duke was not sitting in judgment at that moment, since indeed he had been visiting with Capsali, the Plateia was even the spot where the ducal court heard its cases “in the open air” of the square.3 The Plateia was a theater of life in Candia.
To the horror of religious leaders like Capsali, even Candiote Jews loved to watch the spectacle of the market and court proceedings—especially on Saturday mornings, when they should have been at Sabbath prayers.4 Though Capsali’s personal visit to the duke, the highest colonial official and governor of the island, was certainly not typical, for at least three centuries before Capsali’s time, every Candiote Jew spent time in the Plateia, probably followed by a walk back to the Jewish Quarter. Such was Capsali’s plan on that day.
Map 2. Venetian Candia c. 1350–1450.
The Candia in which Elia Capsali lived thrived as a cosmopolitan colonial capital. During his lifetime, the city’s cultural life bustled even more than it had a century earlier. Byzantine refugees fleeing Constantinople in the aftermath of the Ottoman conquest of 1453 created a hub for literature, art, and classical philosophy in this Veneto-Greek milieu.5 Nevertheless, even in the darker century after the Black Death, Candia served as a key node for travel, trade, and settlement, and had done so since surprisingly soon after Venice settled its first military colonists on the island in 1211. In fact, during the century or so after the Black Death, Crete hit her