Contributors
The authors would like to thank the following people for their contributions on specific topics: Lukasz Aleksandrowicz (University of Guelph) 8 Contamination Steven Allender and Mike Rayner (Department of Public Health, University of Oxford) 7 Over-Nutrition Peter Backman (Horizons FS Limited) 36 Eating Out David Barling (Centre for Food Policy, City University, London) 21 Agricultural Biodiversity Simone Baroke (Centre for Food Policy, City University, London) 33 Retail Power Paul Brassley (University of Plymouth) 9 Mechanization David Buffin (Centre for Food Policy, City University, London) 15 Pesticides Charlie Clutterbuck (Environmental Practice@Work) 16 Fertilizers; 23 Greenhouse Gases; 40 Citizens Bite Back Alizon Draper and Veronica Tuffrey (Centre for Public Health Nutrition, School of Integrated Health, University of Westminster, London) 6 Nutritional Deficiencies; 30 Staple Foods; 31 Changing Diets Axel Drescher and Johanna Jacobi (University of Freiburg, Germany) 19 Urban Farming David Goodyear (Fairtrade Foundation, London) 29 Fair Trade Jannet King (Myriad Editions) 1 Current Concerns; 4 Environmental Challenges; 5 Water Pressure; 12 Animal Diseases; 17 Working the Land; 20 Fishing and Aquaculture; 22 Organic Farming; 29 Fair Trade; 37 Fast Food; 34 Organic Food; 40 Citizens Bite Back Tim Lobstein (SPRU – Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex) 39 Advertising Becky Price (GeneWatch) 13 Agricultural R&D; 14 Genetically Modified Crops Geof Rayner (Centre for Food Policy, City University, London) 38 Alcohol Peter Stevenson (Compassion in World Farming) 10 Industrial Livestock Production; 25 Live Animal Transport
Investigating what we eat, where we eat and how we eat, who goes hungry and why, reveals a remarkable world of contrasting food and drink cultures. These complex but intelligible patterns are what we set out to represent graphically in this atlas. For all the contributors to The Atlas of Food, the modern world of food is not a random series of “facts” or “events”. The food system is an ever-changing web of industrial, technological, economic, social and political factors that impact on the journey food takes from its production on the farm to the eventual consumers. The picture this atlas presents is troubling. It raises some old and some new questions. Why is food such a political problem for humankind? Why have we not managed to feed ourselves well, equitably, healthily, and within environmental limits? Why does the food system keep provoking political, economic and nutritional crises? In 2007 and 2008, after a period of relatively stable or slowly declining food prices since the last great oil and energy crisis in the early 1970s, the price of many staple foodstuffs rose in national markets around the world, provoking unrest in many countries. Over 50 governments imposed price or export controls, adding to instability elsewhere. Some commentators said these problems would be temporary, that higher prices would encourage production and all would be well if only more food were produced. In fact, food prices did drop briefly but then rose again. By late 2012 they had almost matched the peak of 2007 to 2008. The OECD, FAO and most analysts now expect future prices to be volatile and rising, and food security has become a hot political topic one again, not least because of the drought that affected 80 percent of US agricultural land in 2012, and the consequent poor harvest. In truth, the issue of food security never disappeared, though politicians lost interest. For three decades or more, governments assumed that food could best be managed with the application of neo-liberal economic policies. But in an unregulated market, food is consumed not by those who need it most, but by those whose consumption is most profitable to the large agro-business corporations. Instead of the market serving consumers globally, consumers in wealthy countries and communities are increasingly over-consuming unhealthy diets, while poor communities and countries continue to suffer under-nutrition, hunger and starvation. Policy-makers need to guide changes in the ways food is produced, distributed, consumed and wasted, as well as how much is produced, because chronic hunger is not simply a consequence of scarcity; it is a consequence of poverty and powerlessness. Ending global hunger is not just about improving access to, and control of, material resources, but also about poverty, justice, rights and democracy. This wider perspective, linking production and consumption, environment, health and economy, power and distribution, is reflected in this atlas. Attempting to engage with this more complex analysis, some orthodox institutions have proposed including some concern for environmental sustainability in their new push for increasing production as the answer to future problems. The phrase “sustainable intensification” is frequently invoked, though its meaning remains vague and contested. We contend, however, that the problems of the food system cannot be understood merely as problems of production; the perspectives of consumers are at least as relevant as those of producers. We therefore understand the goal of “food security” in far broader terms as encompassing considerations of: sufficiency, sustainability, equitable distribution and safety. Nothing less will do.
Introduction
Power in the food chain One of the particular weaknesses in the analysis “the world must produce more food” is that it downplays or ignores the shifts of power in the food system, away from farmers and consumers in favour of traders, retailers and speculators. In 2012, UNCTAD produced a report showing that financiers traded food contracts as if there was 30 times more food on the planet than there was. They are applying fantasy economics to food, much as they did to mortgages, borrowings and savings. Food traders and retailers increasingly control supply chains from farmers to consumers, making decisions not just about quantities and prices but also quality. Despite the rhetoric of the food retailers and processors that the system is driven by individual consumer choices, large agri-business corporations make the key decisions that impact on both farmers and consumers. Corporations often claim they are just responding to the demands of consumers; otherwise (they argue) they would be out of business. But while consumers are portrayed as the arbiters of choice and taste, as individuals we often recognize the limits to our power to influence them. Why would we, the world’s consumers, choose to starve or to be obese, or suffer from diet-related diseases? Most consumers would prefer a food system that caused less