That is precisely what Matthew was up against until he found the one who came into the world to seek and to save that which was lost.
(3) This story tells us something about Jesus. It was as he walked along the lakeside that he called Matthew. As a great scholar said, ‘Even as he was walking along he was looking for opportunities.’ Jesus was never off duty. If he could find one man or one woman for God as he walked, he did so. What a harvest we could gather in if we looked for men and women for Christ as we walked!
(4) Of all the disciples, Matthew gave up most. He literally left all to follow Jesus. Peter and Andrew, James and John could go back to the boats. There were always fish to catch and always the old trade to which to return; but Matthew burned his boats completely. With one action, in one moment of time, by one swift decision he had put himself out of his job forever, for having left his tax-collector’s job, he would never get it back. At some time in every life there comes the moment to decide, and we have to be big enough to make the big decisions.
A certain famous man had the habit of going for long country walks on Dartmoor. When he came to a brook that was rather too wide to cross comfortably, the first thing he did was to throw his coat over to the other side. He made sure that there was to be no turning back. He took the decision to cross and made sure he was going to stick to it.
Matthew was the man who staked everything on Christ; and he was not wrong.
(5) From his decision, Matthew got at least three things.
(a) He got clean hands. From now on, he could look the world in the face. He might be very much poorer and life must be very much rougher, and the luxuries and the comforts were gone; but from now on his hands were clean and, because his hands were clean, his mind was at rest.
(b) He lost one job but he got a far bigger one. It has been said that Matthew left everything but one thing – he did not leave his pen. Scholars do not think that the first gospel, as it stands, is the work of Matthew; but they do think that it embodies one of the most important documents of all history, the first written account of the teaching of Jesus, and that that document was written by Matthew. With his orderly mind, his systematic way of working, his familiarity with the pen, Matthew was the first to give the world a book on the teaching of Jesus.
(c) The odd thing is that Matthew’s reckless decision brought him the one thing he can least have been looking for – it brought him immortal and worldwide fame. Everyone knows the name of Matthew as one forever connected with the transmission of the story of Jesus. Had Matthew refused the call, he would have had a local notoriety as the follower of a disreputable trade which everyone hated; because he answered the call, he gained a worldwide fame as the man who gave us the record of the words of Jesus. God never goes back on those who stake their all on him.
WHERE THE NEED IS GREATEST
Mark 2:15–17
Jesus was sitting at a meal in Levi’s house, and many tax-collectors and sinners were sitting with Jesus and his disciples, for there were many of them, and they sought his company. When the experts in the law, who belonged to the school of the Pharisees, saw that he was eating in the company of sinners and tax-gatherers, they began to say to his disciples, ‘It is with tax-collectors and sinners that he is eating and drinking.’ Jesus heard them. ‘It is not those who are in good health who need a doctor,’ he said, ‘but those who are ill. I did not come to bring an invitation to people who think that they have no faults but to those who know that they are sinners.’
ONCE again Jesus is flinging down the gauntlet of defiance.
When Matthew had yielded himself to Jesus, he invited him to his house. Naturally, having discovered Jesus for himself, he wished his friends to share his great discovery – and his friends were like himself. It could not be any other way. Matthew had chosen a job which cut him off from the society of all respectable and orthodox people, and he had to find his friends among outcasts like himself. Jesus gladly accepted that invitation; and these outcasts of society sought his company.
Nothing could better show the difference between Jesus and the scribes and Pharisees and orthodox good people of the day. They were not the kind of people whose company sinners would have sought. They would have been looked at with bleak condemnation and arrogant superiority. They would have been frozen out of such company even before they had entered it.
A clear distinction was drawn between those who kept the law and those whom they called the people of the land. The people of the land were the common masses who did not observe all the rules and the regulations of conventional Pharisaic piety. By the orthodox it was forbidden to have anything to do with these people. The strict law-keeper must have no fellowship with them at all, must not talk with them nor go on a journey with them. As far as possible, even doing business with them must be avoided; to marry a daughter to one of them was inconceivable; above all, those who adhered to the law must not accept hospitality from or give hospitality to such a person. By going to Matthew’s house and sitting at his table and keeping company with his friends, Jesus was defying the orthodox conventions of his day.
We need not for a moment suppose that all these people were sinners in the moral sense of the term. The word sinner (hamartōlos) had a double significance. It did mean someone who broke the moral law; but it also meant someone who did not observe the scribal law. The person who committed adultery and the person who ate pork were both sinners; those who were guilty of theft and murder and those who did not wash their hands the required number of times and in the required way before they ate were also sinners. These guests of Matthew no doubt included many who had broken the moral law and played fast and loose with life; but no doubt they also included many whose only sin was that they did not observe the scribal rules and regulations.
When Jesus was taxed with this shocking conduct, his answer was quite simple. ‘A doctor’, he said, ‘goes where he is needed. People in good health do not need him; sick people do; I am doing just the same; I am going to those who are sick in soul and who need me most.’
Verse 17 is a highly concentrated verse. It sounds at first hearing as if Jesus had no use for good people. But the point of it is that the very people for whom Jesus can do nothing are those who think themselves so good that they do not need anything done for them; and the very people for whom Jesus can do everything are those who are sinners and know it and who long in their hearts for a cure. To have no sense of need is to have erected a barrier between us and Jesus; to have a sense of need is to possess the passport to his presence.
The attitude of the orthodox Jews to sinners was really compounded of two things.
(1) It was compounded of contempt. ‘The ignorant man’, said the Rabbis, ‘can never be pious.’ Heraclitus, the Greek philosopher, was an arrogant aristocrat. One called Scythinus undertook to put his discourses into verse so that ordinary uneducated people might read and understand them. The reaction of Heraclitus was put into an epigram. ‘Heraclitus am I. Why do ye drag me up and down, ye illiterate? It was not for you I toiled, but for such as understand me. One man in my sight is a match for 30,000, but the countless hosts do not make a single one.’ For the masses he had nothing but contempt. The scribes and Pharisees despised the common people; Jesus loved them. The scribes and Pharisees stood on their dignity of formal piety and looked down on sinners; Jesus came and sat beside them, and by sitting beside them lifted them up.
(2) It was compounded of fear. The orthodox were afraid of the contagion of the sinner; they were afraid that they might be infected with sin. They were like doctors who would refuse to attend a case of infectious illness lest they contracted it themselves. Jesus was the one who forgot himself in a great desire to save others. C. T. Studd, the great missionary of Christ, had four lines of doggerel that he loved to quote:
Some want to live within the sound
Of church or chapel bell;
I