Soft Tissue Management. Ariel J. Raigrodski. Читать онлайн. Newlib. NEWLIB.NET

Автор: Ariel J. Raigrodski
Издательство: Bookwire
Серия:
Жанр произведения: Медицина
Год издания: 0
isbn: 9780867157406
Скачать книгу
maxillary central incisors in a sample of 100 participants: cluster A1, slender tooth form and thin gingiva; cluster A2, slender tooth form and thick gingiva; and cluster B, quadratic tooth form with thick gingiva. Cluster A1 corresponds to the thin scalloped phenotype, while cluster B represents the thick flat phenotype. The participants from cluster A2 differed significantly from the other clusters, showing a definitive thick gingiva but slender teeth. Thin gingiva was found in one-third, mainly female participants, while thick gingiva was found in two-thirds of the participants and was predominantly a male trait.

      Patients will frequently present with both thick and thin periodontium in the same dentition. Canines and mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars tend to have a thin periodontium due to their position in the dental arch. Central incisors are usually associated with thick periodontium. As a general rule, the prevalence of thick periodontium is more common in males than in females, in younger patients than in older patients, in the maxilla than in the mandible, and in white patients (72% to 88%) than in patients of Asian descent (< 40%). These differences are due to intra- and interindividual variations in conjunction with tooth type, tooth shape, tooth position, and genetic determinants.90,94–99

      The thick phenotype is commonly associated with periodontal durability and health. It is characterized by dense fibrotic gingival tissue, a wide band of keratinized tissue, and flat soft tissue with thick underlying bony architecture. The thin phenotype is usually associated with delicate and friable gingiva that is almost translucent in appearance, a narrow band of keratinized tissue, and highly scalloped soft tissue with thin or minimal underlying buccal bony thickness86–93 (see Table 1-1).

      Clinical implications of tissue phenotype

Thin phenotype Thick phenotype
Inflammation
Soft tissue Gingival recession without pocket formation Marginal inflammation with pocket formation, bleeding on probing, and edema
Hard tissue Loss of the thin vestibular bone plate Formation of intrabony defects
Surgical procedures
Osseous surgery More susceptible to gingival recession Marginal periodontal tissue shows a tendency to grow in a coronal direction
Mucogingival surgeries Associated with partial root coverage Associated with complete root coverage
Guided tissue regeneration Greater postoperative recession Less postoperative recession
Orthodontic treatment Greater risk of developing soft tissue recession Prevents or minimizes soft tissue recession
Implant therapy More susceptible to marginal bone loss, angular bone defects, and recession Maintains stable crestal bone and is less prone to recession
Restorative procedures Restoration may be slightly visible through the thin soft tissue May mask discoloration from metal-ceramic restorations with metal collars and disappearing margins, metal implant abutments, and discolored roots
Extractions Extensive ridge resorption Minimal ridge resorption

       Gingival recession

      A major clinical challenge is gingival recession around ceramic veneers and complete-coverage restorations when the finish line is placed subgingivally. Many etiologic factors have been proposed as the cause for recession. Faulty restorative margins, mechanical and chemical irritants from impression procedures, overcontoured restorations, incomplete removal of excess cement, violation of biologic width, or adverse gingival reactions to alloys used in the oral cavity have all been implicated.92 Patients with thin gingival phenotype are more susceptible to such recession. Gingival grafting should be considered prior to restoration to modify the phenotype to a thicker state.

       Gingival inflammation

      The thin phenotype reacts to insult by initial gingival inflammation followed by gingival recession, while the thick phenotype responds by tissue proliferation and eventual formation of a periodontal pocket. This is probably due to the fact that a thick periodontium has a greater volume of soft tissue than the thin periodontium, with attachment loss leading to development of a periodontal pocket instead of recession.92

       Surgical periodontal therapy

      During the healing stages following osseous resective crown lengthening surgery, the marginal periodontal tissue shows a tendency to grow in a coronal direction. This pattern of coronal displacement of the gingival margin is more pronounced in patients with a thick periodontium compared with those with a thin periodontium phenotype.41 In the context of osseous surgery, it is extremely important to make a distinction presurgically between flat and scalloped gingival architecture. Usually, markedly scalloped soft tissue architecture would be more challenging in terms of pocket recurrence than flat architecture in the interproximal area. This is especially true if the gingiva takes on a scalloped architecture while the underlying osseous tissue does not follow the same scalloped pattern, resulting in greater distance between the tip of the papilla and the crest of the bone, leading to the formation of interproximal pocket depth.86

      For mucogingival surgery such as the coronally positioned flap, it has been shown that greater initial thickness of gingival tissues (> 0.8 to 1.1 mm) is positively associated with complete root coverage. The probabilities of obtaining better root coverage outcomes are strongly related to the marginal tissue thickness.108,109 Tissue thickness is also an important factor to be considered during regenerative procedures around teeth. Tissue thickness greater than 1 mm led to less postoperative recession at 6 months compared with thin tissue (0.6 vs 2.1 mm).102

       Orthodontic therapy

      The development of gingival recession during orthodontic treatment is a major concern as well. Alterations of the mucogingival complex are inevitable during orthodontic therapy, but the important factors to consider are the direction of the tooth movement and the thickness of the buccal gingival tissue. Movement of the tooth in the lingual direction will result in increased thickness of the gingival tissue on the facial aspect. It will also result in coronal migration of the free gingival margin. Movement of the tooth in the facial direction will result in reduced tissue thickness and migration of tissue apically, resulting