57. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24:568–572.
58. Koutouzis T, Koutouzis G, Gadalla H, Neiva R. The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: A short-term randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28:807–814.
59. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23:971–973.
60. Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: A 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:712–719.
61. Moon IS, Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lindhe J. The barrier between the keratinized mucosa and the dental implant. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26:658–663.
62. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25:721–727.
63. Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:635–641.
64. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997; 68:1117–1130.
65. Piatelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Annibali S, Scarano A. Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: A retrospective histologic evaluation of monkeys. J Periodontol 2003; 74:346–352.
66. Callan D, Cobb C, Williams K. DNA probe identification of bacteria colonizing internal surfaces of the implant-abutment interface: A preliminary study. J Periodontol 2005; 76:115–120.
67. Piatelli A, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, et al. Fluids and microbial penetration in the internal part of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant abutment connections. J Periodontol 2001; 72:1146–1150.
68. Quirynen M, Bollen CML, Eyssen H, Van Steeberghe D. Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Brånemark system. An in-vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994; 5:239–244.
69. Quirynen M, Van Steeberghe D. Bacterial colonization of the internal part of two-stage implants. An in vivo study. Clin Oral Implant Res 1993; 4:158–161.
70. Jansen VK, Conrads G, Richter EJ. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12:527–540.
71. Ericsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, Lindhe J, Klinge B. Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 2:255–261.
72. Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2003; 82:232–237.
73. Besimo CE, Guindy JS, Lewetag D, Meyer J. Prevention of bacterial leakage into and from prefabricated screw-retained crowns on implants in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:654–660.
74. Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bossmann K, Kern M. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20:875–881.
75. Riondini L, Marin C, Brunella F, Fini M. Internal contamination of a 2-component implant system after occlusal loading and provisionally luted reconstruction with or without a washer device. J Periodontol 2001; 72:1652–1657.
76. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Impact of platform switching on inter-proximal bone levels around short implants in the posterior region, 1-year results from a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39:688–697.
77. Atieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2010; 81:1350–1366.
78. Enkling N, Jöhren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on peri-implant bone levels: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22:1185–1192.
79. Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli MP, Graziani F, La Monaca G, Polimeni A. Peri-implant marginal bone level: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39:1097–1113.
80. Enkling N, Jöhren P, Katsoulis J, et al. Influence of platform switching on bone-level alterations: A three-year randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res 2013; 92(12 suppl):139S–145S.
81. Vigolo P, Givani A. Platform-switched restorations on wide-diameter implants: A 5-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:103–109.
82. Leutert CR, Stawarczyk B, Truninger TC, Hämmerle CH, Sailer I. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: A laboratory study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27:505–512.
83. Stafford GL. Evidence supporting platform-switching to preserve marginal bone levels not definitive. Evid Based Dent 2012; 13:56–57.
84. Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segalà-Torres M, et al. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009; 29:141–151.
85. Elian N, Bloom M, Dard M, Cho SC, Trushkowsky RD, Tarnow D. Effect of interimplant distance (2 and 3 mm) on the height of interim-plant bone crest: A histomorphometric evaluation. J Periodontol 2011; 82:1749–1756.
86. Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am 1969; 13:87–102.
87. Seibert JL, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In: Lindhe J (ed). Textbook of Clinical Periodontology, ed 2. Copenhangen: Munksgaard, 1989:477–514.
88. Olsson M, Lindhe J, Marinello CP. On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol 1993; 20:570–577.
89. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: Transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36:428–433.
90. Kao RT, Pasquinelli K. Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: A key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002; 30:521–526.
91. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: Visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30:237–243.
92. Weisgold A. Contours of the full crown restoration. Alpha Omegan 1977; 70:77–89.
93. Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: A key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008; 36:193–198.
94. Müller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24:65–71.
95. Vandana KL, Savitha B. Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32:828–830.
96. Müller HP, Könönen E. Variance components of gingival thickness. J Periodontal Res 2005; 40:239–244.
97. Cuny-Houchmand M, Renaudin S, Leroul M, Planche L, Guehennec LL, Soueidan A. Gingival biotype assessement: Visual inspection relevance and maxillary versus mandibular comparison. Open Dent J 2013; 7:1–6.
98. Eger T, Müller HP, Heinecke A. Ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness. Subject