Then and Now
Things were not always like this; in fact, one suspects things were never like this, not here, not anywhere. In this respect as in so many others, we live in utterly novel and unprecedented times. Until what seems like only yesterday, young people were groomed for marriage, and the paths leading to it were culturally set out, at least roughly. Our grandfathers, in polite society, came a-calling and a-wooing at the homes of our grandmothers, under conditions set by the woman, operating from strength on her own turf. A generation later, courting couples began to go out on “dates,” in public and increasingly on the man’s terms, given that he had the income to pay for dinner and dancing. To be sure, some people “played the field,” and dating on college campuses in the prewar years became a matter more of proving popularity than of proving suitability for marriage. But “going steady” was a regular feature of high-school and college life, especially after the war, when the age of marriage dropped considerably, and high-school or college sweethearts often married right after graduation, or even before. Finding a mate, no less than getting an education that would enable him to support her, was at least an unstated goal of many a male undergraduate; many a young woman, so the joke had it, went to college mainly for her MRS. degree, a charge whose truth was proof against libel for legions of college coeds well into the 1960s.1
In other respects as well, the young remained culturally attached to the claims of “real life.” Though times were good, fresh memory kept alive the poverty of the Great Depression and the deaths and dislocations of the war; necessity and the urgencies of life were not out of sight, even for fortunate youth. Opportunity was knocking, the world and adulthood were beckoning, and most of us stepped forward into married life, readily, eagerly, and, truth to tell, without much pondering. We were simply doing – some sooner, some later – what our parents had done, indeed, what all our forebears had done.
Not so today. Now the vast majority go to college, but very few – women or men – go with the hope, or even the wish, of finding a marriage partner. Many do not expect to find there even a path to a career; they often require several years of postgraduate “time off” to figure out what they are going to do with themselves. Sexually active – indeed, hyperactive – they flop about from one relationship to another. To the bewildered eye of this admittedly much-too-old but still-romantic observer, they manage to appear all at once casual and carefree and grim and humorless about getting along with the opposite sex. The young men, nervous predators, act as if any woman were equally good; they are given not to falling in love with one, but to scoring in bed with many. And in this sporting attitude they are now matched by some female trophy hunters.
But most young women strike me as sad, lonely, and confused. Hoping for something more, they are not enjoying their hard-won sexual liberation as much as liberation theory says they should.* Forget about wooing; today’s collegians do not even make dates or other forward-looking commitments to see one another. In this, as in so many other ways, they reveal their blindness to the passing of time and its meaning. Those very few who couple off seriously and get married upon graduation, as their parents did, are looked upon as freaks.
After college, the scene is even more remarkable and bizarre: singles bars, personal “partner wanted” ads (almost never mentioning marriage as a goal), men practicing serial monogamy (or what someone has aptly renamed “rotating polygamy”), women chronically disappointed in the failure of men to “commit.” For the first time in human history, mature women by the tens of thousands live the entire decade of their twenties – their most fertile years – neither in the homes of their fathers nor in the homes of their husbands, unprotected, lonely, and out of sync with their inborn nature. Some women positively welcome this state of affairs, but most do not; resenting the personal price they pay for their worldly independence, they nevertheless try to put a good face on things and take refuge in work or feminist ideology. As age thirty comes and goes, they begin to allow themselves to hear their biological clock ticking, and, if husbands continue to be lacking, single motherhood by the hand of science is now an option. Meanwhile, the bachelor herd continue their youthful prowl, with real life in suspended animation, living out what Kay Hymowitz, a contributing editor of City Journal, has called a “postmodern postadolescence.”
Those women and men who get lucky enter into what the personal ads call LTRs – long-term relationships – sometimes cohabiting, sometimes not, usually to discover how short an LTR can be. When, after a series of such affairs, marriage happens to them, they enter upon it guardedly and suspiciously, with prenuptial agreements, no common surname, and separate bank accounts.
Courtship, anyone? Don’t be ridiculous.
Recent Obstacles to Courtship
Anyone who seriously contemplates the present scene is – or should be – filled with profound sadness, all the more so if he or she knows the profound satisfactions of a successful marriage. Our hearts go out not only to the children of failed marriages or of nonmarriage – to those betrayed by their parents’ divorce and to those deliberately brought into the world as bastards – but also to the lonely, disappointed, cynical, misguided, or despondent people who are missing out on one of life’s greatest adventures, which brings with it many of life’s deepest experiences, insights, and joys. We watch our sons and daughters, our friends’ children, and our students bumble along from one unsatisfactory relationship to the next, wishing we could help. Few things lead us to curse “o tempore, o mores” more than recognizing our impotence to do anything either about our own young people’s dilemmas or about these melancholy times.
Some conservatives frankly wish to turn back the clock, thinking that a remoralization of society in matters erotic is a real possibility. I, on the other hand, am largely pessimistic, much of the time despairing of any improvement. Inherited cultural forms can be undermined by public policy and social decision, but once fractured, they are hard to repair by rational and self-conscious design. Besides, the causes of the present state of affairs are multiple, powerful, and, I fear, largely irreversible. Anyone who thinks courtship can make a comeback must at least try to understand what he is up against.
Some of the obstacles in the way of getting married are of very recent origin; indeed, they have occurred during the adult lifetime of those of us over fifty. Perhaps for this reason they may seem to some people to be reversible, a spasm connected with the “‘abnormal” 1960s. But when these obstacles are rightly understood, one can see that they spring from the very heart of liberal democratic society and modernity.
Here is a partial list of the recent changes in our society and culture that hamper courtship and marriage: the sexual revolution, made possible especially by effective female contraception; the ideology of feminism and the changing educational and occupational status of women; the destigmatization of bastardy, divorce, infidelity, and abortion; the general erosion of shame and awe regarding sexual matters, exemplified most vividly in the ubiquitous and voyeuristic presentation of sexual activity in movies and on television; widespread morally neutral sex education in schools; the explosive increase in the numbers of young people whose parents have been divorced (and in those born out of wedlock who have never known their father); great increases in geographic mobility, with a resulting loosening of ties to place and extended family of origin; and, harder to describe precisely, a popular culture that celebrates youth and independence not as a transient stage en route to adulthood but as “the time of our lives,” imitable at all ages, and an ethos that lacks transcendent aspirations and asks of us no devotion to family, God, or country, encouraging us simply to soak up the pleasures of the present.
The change most immediately devastating to wooing is probably the sexual revolution. For why would a man court a woman for marriage when she may be sexually enjoyed without it? Contrary to what the youth of the Sixties believed, they were not the first to feel the power of sexual desire. Many – perhaps most – men in earlier times avidly sought sexual pleasure prior to and outside of marriage. But they usually distinguished, as did the culture generally, between women one fooled around with and women one married, between a woman of easy virtue and a woman of virtue simply. Only respectable