A month later, Jim Harbaugh was named Michigan’s new head coach. Harbaugh had been a star quarterback for the Wolverines before a long career in the NFL. But what distinguishes him even more today are his achievements as a head coach. In 2007, Harbaugh inherited a 1-11 Stanford Cardinal team. In his first season at the helm, Stanford pulled off one of the biggest upsets in college football history, when the overmatched Cardinal beat the #1 USC Trojans at the Coliseum.3 As the fortunes of the Cardinal improved, so did the talent interested in the school. Harbaugh eventually signed a quarterback out of Texas by the name of Andrew Luck.4 By Luck’s fourth season on “the Farm,” the Cardinal brought an 11-1 record into the Orange Bowl, where they blew out traditional power Virginia Tech 40-12.
Having turned Stanford into a national football power, Harbaugh moved on to the NFL. In his first three years as head coach of the San Francisco 49ers, he took the team to the NFC Championship Game three times. (The 49ers hadn’t sniffed anything resembling greatness since the mid-1990s). In his second year, they went all the way to the Super Bowl. Although the 49ers lost to the Baltimore Ravens (coached by Harbaugh’s brother, John) in a game that went down to the final drive, Harbaugh had established himself as one of the better and more innovative coaches in all of football. In short, Michigan’s hire of this most “Michigan” of men was a coup. And recruits noticed.
While Harbaugh arguably didn’t have enough time or staff to build a big recruiting class for 2015, by National Signing Day Michigan’s Rivals’ ranking had risen all the way to #50, including fifteen 4-Star recruits and the consensus #1 recruit, Rashan Gary. 2016’s class looks even better. As of this writing, Harbaugh can claim the #5 recruiting class, including nine 4-stars. Harbaugh’s track record of success screams good credit, and a briefly down-on-its-luck Michigan team has a bright future.
What stands in Harbaugh’s way is Michigan’s traditional rival, Ohio State. Coached by Urban Meyer, the Buckeyes won’t give up their perch at the top of the Big Ten’s recruiting and football heap easily. While there are few college coaches with Harbaugh’s “street cred,” Meyer is one of them.
Meyer took over the head coaching reins at Utah in 2003. Notably, Utah never comes up when fans talk about football powers. But by his second season at Utah, Meyer coached the team to a 12-0 record that ended with a victory in the Fiesta Bowl. After the undefeated season, Meyer was hired as head coach of the Florida Gators. In his second season there, the Gators won the national championship. Meyer added a second national title to his resume in his fourth season.5 Poor health ultimately forced Meyer to resign.
After a year off, he was named head coach of Ohio State, and it didn’t take him long to work his magic. After an undefeated first season in Columbus and a 12-2 record his second year, Meyer’s Buckeyes overcame an early 2014 stumble to Virginia Tech to win the national championship in blowout fashion over the Oregon Ducks. Recruiting victories predictably increased with the improved on-the-field fortunes of the Buckeyes. As Meyer told USA Today, “I can’t wait to go out recruiting. You can’t recruit to this [success] now, you’re officially a bad recruiter.”6 Rivals ranked last year’s Buckeye class #9 in the country. As of this writing, 2016’s class is ranked #1, including two 5-star recruits.
Two great coaches, with brilliant track records, correlates with abundant “credit” in the market for top football talent. On top of past success, the Horseshoe at Ohio State and the Big House at Michigan represent legendary stadiums that aspiring football stars know well. Harbaugh explained it best to Sports Illustrated in 2015: “There’s no bad time to see Michigan, and no bad way to see Michigan.”7 Not only do the coaches of each school personify credit, but their schools do, too.
But wonderful as the Buckeye and Wolverine traditions may be, there’s seemingly always something better out there, something a little bit superior. Odds are even the most ardent Buckeye and Wolverine fans would acknowledge that no school represents on the tradition front as well as the University of Southern California (USC).
The University of Southern California can claim a number of “mosts.” It has produced more NFL draft picks, including first round NFL picks, than any other college football team. In nineteen of the last thirty-nine years, USC has led the NFL with the most alums in the league.8 Of course, these stats leave out its six Heisman Trophy winners (seven if you count Reggie Bush), its numerous national titles going back to the 1920s, the Trojan Song Girls, Traveler (the statuesque white horse that gallops around the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum after each score), the Trojan Marching Band blaring “Conquest” after victories, the movie stars in the stands and at practices, the southern California weather. The list is long. Although the Trojan colors are Cardinal & Gold, USC can arguably lay claim to the bluest of college football blood.
Yet even giants stumble. As the twenty-first century dawned, USC hadn’t won a national football title since 1978. The drought was a long one for its faithful fans, and worse, USC wasn’t that good in the 1980s and 1990s. Not only had crosstown rival UCLA eclipsed the Trojans, but fellow blue-blood Notre Dame had also come to dominate the intersectional rivalry between the two schools.
So while there’s “no bad time to see USC,” when Pete Carroll was hired as head coach in 2000, the team had long since lost its luster. The three coaches before him had been fired for having failed to field a consistent winner, despite legendary former Oklahoma coach Barry Switzer’s description of Southern Cal as “a great program with great tradition and something to sell.”9 The University of Southern California’s most valuable source of credit was its tradition, but the credit had seemingly run out.
Worse, Carroll hardly seemed like a great hire. Good looking, charismatic, and full of energy, Carroll had a measly 33-31 record in the NFL before USC athletic director Mike Garrett hired him. Carroll had also been fired from both of his head coaching jobs in the NFL prior to USC.10 At least early on, his past record, along with USC’s tarnished brand, reflected in the team’s access to the ultimate resource: top high school players.
Carroll’s first Trojan team went 6-6 and lost in the Las Vegas Bowl. This was hardly an auspicious start for a team used to playing fellow giants like Michigan and Ohio State on New Year’s Day in Pasadena. Carroll did sign fifteen 4-Star players after the season, but his 2002 recruiting class was ranked “only” #13.
The next season ended with an 11-2 record, an Orange Bowl victory over Iowa, and a national ranking of #4. Notable here is that USC’s subsequent recruiting class reflected the team’s renewed success on the field. Carroll signed two 5-Stars for 2003, and Rivals ranked his class #3.
The Trojans followed a successful 2003 campaign with a 12-1 record, a win over Michigan in the Rose Bowl, and the AP National Championship. Recruiting? Carroll signed eight 5-Stars in a 2004 class that Rivals ranked #1. The following year the Trojans demolished Oklahoma in the Orange Bowl for their second straight title. Carroll signed four more 5-Stars after the season, and USC won the Rivals recruiting title yet again. After losing to Texas the next year in its bid for a third straight national title, USC once more claimed the Rivals recruiting crown.11
The University of Southern California itself always had credit potential based on its glamorous history. The addition of Carroll’s previously unrevealed genius created an unbeatable combination. In the credit sense, lenders lined up to hand USC the best resources from across the country. The college football aristocrat regained its stature as the bluest of blue chips.
Caroll naysayers will doubtlessly point to the Trojan football team being slapped with probation after he left for the NFL in 2010. His two trips to the Super Bowl, including one victory in 2014, indicate that such skepticism is unwarranted. If paying for players is seen as the source of USC’s modern success, then what goes unexplained is why the Trojans were so lousy in the 1980s and 1990s.
Nevertheless,